Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
she lied and cheated and murdered
Just shows how immature, uninformed and ignorant most Trump supporters are. They have no proof of any of this, but they continue to parrot the same things the idiot Trump tells them.
but they continue to parrot the same things the idiot Trump tells them.
As usual.....Trumpbots cannot provide any facts....all they can do is post their jr-hi comments....
The facts are that Hillary and her IT crew broke every goddamn rule, regulation, and law there is for classified communications within the government. Having a private server for official use would never be approved. She sent classified information on that system multiple times, that's a fact. That means she broke the law. Pleading ignorance is the only "defense" she has. Does it matter if she "recalls" having the training or not? No. It doesn't change the FACT that the whole system was illegal to begin with.
The funny thing is that you are telling us she didn't say that she didn't recall. So what does that mean? She did recall having the training and willfully choose to break the rules for handling classified information? You're claiming she isn't that incompetent or forgetful....but if that's the case then that means she willfully broke the law. The only defense she has legally is that she was "unaware" that the law was being broken. We all know she wasn't that stupid, she did it willfully and should be in jail for it. Obama's cronies in the FBI have to put out the narrative she was too stupid to know what's going on, or they have to press charges.
But hey, keep arguing she's not that dumb and knew what was going on. Maybe the FBI will press charges someday.
.....the NYTimes writes:
1. "Hillary Clinton may not be indicted on criminal charges over her handling of classified email, but the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, all but indicted her judgment and competence on Tuesday – two vital pillars of her presidential candidacy – and in the kind of terms that would be politically devastating in a normal election year."
This is really some piece.
"Mrs. Clinton’s campaign is built on the premise that she has the national security experience and well-honed instincts to keep Americans safe in the age of terrorism, and that Donald J. Trump does not. Nearly every day, she seeks to present herself as a more thoughtful and responsible leader.
She has spent months describing Mr. Trump as “reckless,” “unprepared” and “temperamentally unfit” to be president, and she has presented her four years as secretary of state and eight in the senate as unparalleled preparation for becoming commander in chief.
Yet in just a few minutes of remarks, Mr. Comey called into question Mrs. Clinton’s claims of superiority more memorably, mightily and effectively than Mr. Trump has over the past year. And with potentially lasting consequences."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/clinton-campaign-trump.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1
Link?
FBI Director Admits Hillary Clinton Emails Were Not Properly Marked Classified
Rep. Matt Cartwright: were these properly documented, were they properly marked according to the manual with the little “cs”?
FBI Director James Comey: no…There were three e-mails. Yhe “c” was in the body, in the text but there was no header on the e-mail or the text.
Rep. Matt Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified, and were following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
FBI Director James Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Womp womp...that one is for free
FBI Director James Comey: no…There were three e-mails. Yhe “c” was in the body, in the text but there was no header on the e-mail or the text.
Out of over 100?
Thank you
Ah, you're confusing what he said under oath with what he said in his stump speech again. Under oath a hundred became 3. Sorry!
FBI Directors do NOT make stump speeches dumbass.
That's not the key point. Call his speech anything you want but it's not the same as being under oath. Now, you are free to complain about my punctuation.
.....the NYTimes writes:
1. "Hillary Clinton may not be indicted on criminal charges over her handling of classified email, but the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, all but indicted her judgment and competence on Tuesday – two vital pillars of her presidential candidacy – and in the kind of terms that would be politically devastating in a normal election year."
This is really some piece.
"Mrs. Clinton’s campaign is built on the premise that she has the national security experience and well-honed instincts to keep Americans safe in the age of terrorism, and that Donald J. Trump does not. Nearly every day, she seeks to present herself as a more thoughtful and responsible leader.
She has spent months describing Mr. Trump as “reckless,” “unprepared” and “temperamentally unfit” to be president, and she has presented her four years as secretary of state and eight in the senate as unparalleled preparation for becoming commander in chief.
Yet in just a few minutes of remarks, Mr. Comey called into question Mrs. Clinton’s claims of superiority more memorably, mightily and effectively than Mr. Trump has over the past year. And with potentially lasting consequences."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/clinton-campaign-trump.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1
Comey is a Republican....what would you expect. He knew he didn't have any evidence that she committed a crime....he said that and proved it when he decided not to indict. But, being a Republican, he wanted to give the attack dogs something to chew on and chew on it they have.
Hillary Clinton is way more qualified to be our President than Trump could ever be....he isn't even qualified to be a janitor in the White House. His temperament, where he can be baited with a tweet says more than we need to know to trust him with the power to cause a nuclear war. Those Republicans who kid themselves into thinking that he will learn "on the job" are playing with fire to even consider such an ignorant and ill prepared person to be our leader. His supporters are just as ignorant as he is for supporting him.
Comey said she didnt delete emails with the purpose of hiding anything. So the media smacks it off the table and opts for the "I think" defense: I think she deleted them because she had something to hide
Viola! Fuck evidence you can just assert it to be true
That is not what Comey said.
FBI Director Admits Hillary Clinton Emails Were Not Properly Marked Classified
Rep. Matt Cartwright: were these properly documented, were they properly marked according to the manual with the little “cs”?
FBI Director James Comey: no…There were three e-mails. Yhe “c” was in the body, in the text but there was no header on the e-mail or the text.
Rep. Matt Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified, and were following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
FBI Director James Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
Womp womp...that one is for free
FBI Director James Comey: no…There were three e-mails. Yhe “c” was in the body, in the text but there was no header on the e-mail or the text.
Out of over 100?
Thank you
Ah, you're confusing what he said under oath with what he said in his stump speech again. Under oath a hundred became 3. Sorry!
FBI Directors do NOT make stump speeches dumbass.
That's not the key point. Call his speech anything you want but it's not the same as being under oath. Now, you are free to complain about my punctuation.
No way will I ever complain about anyone's punctuation. I am an Engineer and barely made it through English Comp.
Comey did say this under oath:
Gowdy asked if it was true that Clinton never sent or received classified information over email.
Comey said it was not true.
Gowdy asked if it was true that nothing was marked as classified on Clinton's emails when she sent or received them.
Comey indicated that was not true.
I watched Hillary last night with Matt Laur and she came up with the excuse that there were no headers on the emails. . Faxes that are sent to an email address have headers since they are copied. Promotions and advertisements have headers. I have never got an email from an individual that had a header.
what do you mean? I have Benghazi, 33,000 email deletions after a subpoena was delivered. And I have video of her blaming a video on the Benghazi disaster. did you mean to write OOPs? Oh, and there is the FBI director stating she used poor judgement. Well, that ain't who I want running the country. A poor judgement, liar, cheater and murderer. Nope. Did you watch her last night. She doubled down on her poor judgement by saying she regretted signing off on the Iraq war. Well ain't she a good monday morning QB? hahahahahahahahahahaha no defending her sweetie.she lied and cheated and murdered
Just shows how immature, uninformed and ignorant most Trump supporters are. They have no proof of any of this, but they continue to parrot the same things the idiot Trump tells them.
As usual.....Trumpbots cannot provide any facts....all they can do is post their jr-hi comments....
The facts are that Hillary and her IT crew broke every goddamn rule, regulation, and law there is for classified communications within the government. Having a private server for official use would never be approved. She sent classified information on that system multiple times, that's a fact. That means she broke the law. Pleading ignorance is the only "defense" she has. Does it matter if she "recalls" having the training or not? No. It doesn't change the FACT that the whole system was illegal to begin with.
The funny thing is that you are telling us she didn't say that she didn't recall. So what does that mean? She did recall having the training and willfully choose to break the rules for handling classified information? You're claiming she isn't that incompetent or forgetful....but if that's the case then that means she willfully broke the law. The only defense she has legally is that she was "unaware" that the law was being broken. We all know she wasn't that stupid, she did it willfully and should be in jail for it. Obama's cronies in the FBI have to put out the narrative she was too stupid to know what's going on, or they have to press charges.
But hey, keep arguing she's not that dumb and knew what was going on. Maybe the FBI will press charges someday.
That's bullshit. If anything you are saying was true, the FBI would have indicted her. You ignorant conservatives are so dumb, it's amazing how you all even survive.
Please post links from Comey's report that prove she sent classified information. You are repeating the lie that Trump continues to spew because you are too ignorant to research and find the truth.
And my OP shows just how her comments were twisted to discredit her, but there is no proof that is what she actually said.
Go peddle your lies somewhere else.....those of us who know the truth aren't buying it.
Hillary has been given every position she has ever held.
How does that 'qualify' her?
What I find exceptionally funny is she is standing on this 'top secret' 'classified' at the top of a email as her not having any on her server. well what if the email hadn't been through to determine yet if it ought to be top secret or classified. It seems to me the FBI guy said in the margins were circled 'c' meaning classified material. What, oops, she lies, let's call a duck a duck already. And who the fk knows if any of the 33k were or were not classified. What a loser.As usual.....Trumpbots cannot provide any facts....all they can do is post their jr-hi comments....
The facts are that Hillary and her IT crew broke every goddamn rule, regulation, and law there is for classified communications within the government. Having a private server for official use would never be approved. She sent classified information on that system multiple times, that's a fact. That means she broke the law. Pleading ignorance is the only "defense" she has. Does it matter if she "recalls" having the training or not? No. It doesn't change the FACT that the whole system was illegal to begin with.
The funny thing is that you are telling us she didn't say that she didn't recall. So what does that mean? She did recall having the training and willfully choose to break the rules for handling classified information? You're claiming she isn't that incompetent or forgetful....but if that's the case then that means she willfully broke the law. The only defense she has legally is that she was "unaware" that the law was being broken. We all know she wasn't that stupid, she did it willfully and should be in jail for it. Obama's cronies in the FBI have to put out the narrative she was too stupid to know what's going on, or they have to press charges.
But hey, keep arguing she's not that dumb and knew what was going on. Maybe the FBI will press charges someday.
That's bullshit. If anything you are saying was true, the FBI would have indicted her. You ignorant conservatives are so dumb, it's amazing how you all even survive.
Please post links from Comey's report that prove she sent classified information. You are repeating the lie that Trump continues to spew because you are too ignorant to research and find the truth.
And my OP shows just how her comments were twisted to discredit her, but there is no proof that is what she actually said.
Go peddle your lies somewhere else.....those of us who know the truth aren't buying it.
It wasn't up to the FBI to indict her, it was up to the Department of Justice, the Obama appointed hack. You know, the one that met with BJ Clinton on an airplane right before making her "decision".
This is Comey's statement from the FBI website itself:
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent
.....
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
Now, are you done making a jackass out of yourself?
Comey said she didnt delete emails with the purpose of hiding anything. So the media smacks it off the table and opts for the "I think" defense: I think she deleted them because she had something to hide
Viola! Fuck evidence you can just assert it to be true
That is not what Comey said.
Google it and watch how wrong you are. But again, the facts are hard and have details. Going "Hillary lied about everything" is easier but the opposite of the evidence Comey himself put forward. Under Oath...Under Oath
Comey said she didnt delete emails with the purpose of hiding anything. So the media smacks it off the table and opts for the "I think" defense: I think she deleted them because she had something to hide
Viola! Fuck evidence you can just assert it to be true
That is not what Comey said.
Google it and watch how wrong you are. But again, the facts are hard and have details. Going "Hillary lied about everything" is easier but the opposite of the evidence Comey himself put forward. Under Oath...Under Oath
You posted the quote, you provide the link.
Comey said she didnt delete emails with the purpose of hiding anything. So the media smacks it off the table and opts for the "I think" defense: I think she deleted them because she had something to hide
Viola! Fuck evidence you can just assert it to be true
That is not what Comey said.
Google it and watch how wrong you are. But again, the facts are hard and have details. Going "Hillary lied about everything" is easier but the opposite of the evidence Comey himself put forward. Under Oath...Under Oath
You posted the quote, you provide the link.
No, it takes more than someone just going "Nuh uh". You didnt provide any link so whats different?
Comey said she didnt delete emails with the purpose of hiding anything. So the media smacks it off the table and opts for the "I think" defense: I think she deleted them because she had something to hide
Viola! Fuck evidence you can just assert it to be true
That is not what Comey said.
Google it and watch how wrong you are. But again, the facts are hard and have details. Going "Hillary lied about everything" is easier but the opposite of the evidence Comey himself put forward. Under Oath...Under Oath
You posted the quote, you provide the link.
No, it takes more than someone just going "Nuh uh". You didnt provide any link so whats different?
I gave my opinion that what you posted was bullshit. I don't post a link to my opinion. Apparently you made up something that Comey said since you don't have a link.
That is not what Comey said.
Google it and watch how wrong you are. But again, the facts are hard and have details. Going "Hillary lied about everything" is easier but the opposite of the evidence Comey himself put forward. Under Oath...Under Oath
You posted the quote, you provide the link.
No, it takes more than someone just going "Nuh uh". You didnt provide any link so whats different?
I gave my opinion that what you posted was bullshit. I don't post a link to my opinion. Apparently you made up something that Comey said since you don't have a link.
Your opinion doesnt matter to me and your opinion isnt a fact. Either Comey said it or he didnt. Your opinion that the sky is red doesnt mean I have to prove its blue. Thats your dumbass