Clinton’s Lead Over Bernie Sanders Slipping in New Poll

[thereisnospoon]

Is she going to lose to another man?

Can it be she's not capable of winning?

What do they really think of her behind closed doors?

Maybe it's the "Bill Factor"?


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/13/us/politics/hillary-clintons-lead-over-bernie-sanders-slipping-in-new-poll.html?ref=politics&_r=0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

Sanders has all but locked up the entitlement/freeloader vote.
These people, mainly college students and recent grads actually believe Sanders can enact government policy to provide free college tuition and no pay loans for students.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Is she going to lose to another man?

Can it be she's not capable of winning?

What do they really think of her behind closed doors?

Maybe it's the "Bill Factor"?


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/13/us/politics/hillary-clintons-lead-over-bernie-sanders-slipping-in-new-poll.html?ref=politics&_r=0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_democratic_presidential_caucus-3195.html

Who cares if Hillary or Bernie is ahead? They are both excellent choices, and the idea is to decide which is best. It's not like anyone in the GOP clown car could beat either of them.

Excellent choices for WHAT?

 

[thereisnospoon]

and where does Bernie go after Iowa and New Hampshire?

Every state with a large contingent of slackers( college age) people have been gravitating to Sanders.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Hillary Clinton’s national lead is slipping faster in 2016 than it did in 2008

Hillary Clinton’s national lead is slipping faster in 2016 than it did in 2008

So what. Either would be a well qualified president, and their programs aren't that different anyway.

Well qualified? how so?...One is an elitist liar with a queen bee complex the size of Texas. The other is dried up card carrying socialist that is so old, he farts dust.

 

[FJO]

If Sanders had even the slightest modicum of integrity, he would have run as an Independent, you know, the title under which he pretended to serve for far too many years.

He is a typical socialist moocher. He lives off the wealth, talent, achievements and efforts of others. His main driving force is envy of his betters, whose wealth - moral and financial - he could only achieve through stealth and government sponsored confiscation.

Still, he is better than the rapist-enabler lying Hillary.

 

[BULLDOG]

Hillary Clinton’s national lead is slipping faster in 2016 than it did in 2008

Hillary Clinton’s national lead is slipping faster in 2016 than it did in 2008

So what. Either would be a well qualified president, and their programs aren't that different anyway.

Well qualified? how so?...One is an elitist liar with a queen bee complex the size of Texas. The other is dried up card carrying socialist that is so old, he farts dust.

Then don't vote for them. I'm supporting Trump up until the primaries are done. After that, I'm not sure yet.

 

[alpine]

If Sanders had even the slightest modicum of integrity, he would have run as an Independent, you know, the title under which he pretended to serve for far too many years.

He is a typical socialist moocher. He lives off the wealth, talent, achievements and efforts of others. His main driving force is envy of his betters, whose wealth - moral and financial - he could only achieve through stealth and government sponsored confiscation.

Still, he is better than the rapist-enabler lying Hillary.

This is exactly what the loyalists were arguing before the French revolution

"I am rich MF, kiss my shiny ass....."