CNN (June 11th): No criminal charges expected against Clinton in email probe

[MarcATL]

BREAKINGBOMBSHELL: RUBES STILL FALLING FOR HILLARY IMMINENT INDICTMENT STORIES FOR THIRD YEAR IN A ROW!!!

USMB - The champagne has gone flat, the cake is stale, but the tards are still wearing their party hats, waiting for the signal that will never come.

"I haven't gone to the bathroom in eighteen months", one creduloid who is literally full of shit stated. "I'm worried the indictment will come down while I'm taking a dump and I'll miss my chance to be the first to post about it."

As they talk in excited tones in their huddled groups, the eyes of the lonely chumps are constantly darting to their propaganda news sites, hoping against hope that today is finally the day.

"I heard an anonymous inside source has said an FBI agent said a judge has just signed a Tase on Sight (TOS) order for Hillary Clinton!", one dupe titters excitedly. "It's happening! It's finally happening!"

But, it isn't happening. It is never happening. And as the sun rises after another long lonely night's vigil and heartbreak, the saps wander blearily-eyed toward the nearest Dunkin Donuts with free wifi to recharge their pathetic souls with black coffee and day old crullers.

"It's being signed right now. I just know it, " one mutters to another as he checks his phone's signal strength.

Just what are you trying to accomplish with your satirical posts, g5?

I think this captures it pretty well:

You did a bang-up job too.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Oldstyle]

Why Hillary will not be indicted

Valerie Plame Wilson: No Ordinary Spy

The Bush administration leaked her name in retaliation for political statements made by her husband. Plames cover was broken and her life was jeopardized. Nobody in the Bush administration was punished and Bush pardoned those who were blamed

Yet, Republicans hold a witch hunt over Hillary having a server where no classified information was actually leaked

Yep, I remember that clearly. Republicans BLATANTLY broke the law, and not a one cared one iota about lawbreaking or of getting justice for it.

They should officially change the name of the Republican Party to "Hypocrits'R'Us"

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

What's hypocritical is applauding Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame's attempt to knee cap the Bush Administration in the month leading up to the election and then accusing the Bush people of "outing" her when that attempt failed miserably to hand Kerry the election. Plame outed herself. She wasn't a "covert" agent and hadn't been one for years. Nobody broke any laws when they revealed what Wilson and Plames agenda was and the lies they told to further that agenda! What Wilson and Plame did was hard ball politics at it's worst and when the Bush White House responded liberals started whining about poor Valerie being "outed". Here's a news flash for you kiddies...when you introduce your wife at Washington cocktail parties as someone who works for the CIA...SHE'S NOT A COVERT AGENT ANY MORE!!!!!!!!!! DUH?

 

[Oldstyle]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

The FBI will find there was no classified information leaked and that rules and regulations were broken but no crime was committed
Hillary will be criticized in the report for using a private server and she will apologize and say she will never do it again

She had an illegal server, she deleted government emails that are under federal law.....she is a felon waiting for conviction.......she sold her office to the highest bidd er and then hid the corruption on her private server....

but hey......you guys have never cared about the law......so this won't matter either.....everything you guys touch turns to shit....and this is how you accomplish it.........

Home owned servers aren't illegal dipshit. Otherwise, Bush could have been impeached.

Your ignorance of the law continues to amaze, R-Derp...it's been illegal for government officials to hide their official communications from Congressional oversight since the Nixon years! The reason Hillary Clinton installed two private servers in her house and used them for ALL of her State Department business was that she didn't want a record of her dealings to be available for scrutiny. Think about that for a while...why would someone NEED to do that?

Still no answer? What security was installed on Hillary's email server?

I can tell you what security WASN'T installed on her two servers! The kind that the State Department has for IT'S official communications! The kind that isn't easy to hack!

 

[MarcATL]

The State Department itself made the case against Hillary violating both the FOIA and The Federal Records Act by declaring Hillary never turned over all State Dept-related e-mails and documents as required by the law.
It has been proven Barry's has been the most criminally non-compliant administration in US hostory regarding obeying the FOIA - 70% non-compliant, and it has been declared by Obama's own State Department that Hillary has been one of THE biggest offenders of breaking this law.

Barry and the WH made the case against Hillary be declaring info was found on her un-encrypted server 'so classified it could not be released in any format because it would cause grave danger to our national security' and by Barry, trying ineptly to defend her, declaring she had acted 'negligently'. Considering both those together, that is enough to prove her guilt regarding 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act.

The OP is correct, however - IMO, about how no charges will be forthcoming. In an act of MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Barry just made history by becoming the 1st President to endorse someone being investigated by HIS FBI, prematurely signaling there is no way he is going to allow an indictment.

He might as well have held a press conference and declared no matter what evidence is presented he will bever allow Hillary to be indicted.

Knowing all the facts, especially those listed above - admissions by our own govt - this is the easiest case in the world to see / prove guilt. Common Sense, even a spoonfull, dictates / shows Hillary is guilty as hell of breaking the law.

And Barry just declared by endorsing her that he will never allow his administration to indict her, adding the final proof that his is the most lawless in our nation's history.

Hillary Clinton is, nor ever was the subject of an FBI investigation. Stop lying!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Obama is protecting her because he is involved in it as well.

Link?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

I'M FUCKING SHOCKED !!!!!

this can''t be right .. we'll need at least 9 more congressional investigations, and 6 more FBI/CIA probes before we appoint another Republican led Special Investigations Committee to get to the bottom of this email travesty.

es

Yes indeedy. We need to spend quite a few millions, if not billions, of American taxpayer's dollars to investigate what has already been investigated numerous times.

We don't need anymore investigations. We need an unbiased President who respects the Constitution and Rule of Law, an AG who is not crooked, and a DOJ that doesn't need to attend court-ordered Ethics classes for failing to legally carry out the enforcement of our laws in a fair/honest judicial manner.

And who would that president be? LOL As if there has ever been one. Maybe Jimmy Carter. That's about it. Nixon was a crook. Both Bushes were crooks. Reagan was a crook. You folks are partisans. You think Republican presidents are perfect and Democratic ones are complete failures and crooks. What BS. You're pathetic.

Nailed it.

Truth be told, most Republicans feel that Nixon was unjustly convicted. Since then they try to tear down Democrats by making them worse than Nixon the crook with statements like "X is worse than Nixon!"

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Why Hillary will not be indicted

Valerie Plame Wilson: No Ordinary Spy

The Bush administration leaked her name in retaliation for political statements made by her husband. Plames cover was broken and her life was jeopardized. Nobody in the Bush administration was punished and Bush pardoned those who were blamed

Yet, Republicans hold a witch hunt over Hillary having a server where no classified information was actually leaked

Place was nothing but a chick that served coffee and cookies at the CIA. No cover was blown. This is why it went away so fast.

True RW vision of women in the workplace.

Yep.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Faun]

Why Hillary will not be indicted

Valerie Plame Wilson: No Ordinary Spy

The Bush administration leaked her name in retaliation for political statements made by her husband. Plames cover was broken and her life was jeopardized. Nobody in the Bush administration was punished and Bush pardoned those who were blamed

Yet, Republicans hold a witch hunt over Hillary having a server where no classified information was actually leaked

Yep, I remember that clearly. Republicans BLATANTLY broke the law, and not a one cared one iota about lawbreaking or of getting justice for it.

They should officially change the name of the Republican Party to "Hypocrits'R'Us"

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

What's hypocritical is applauding Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame's attempt to knee cap the Bush Administration in the month leading up to the election and then accusing the Bush people of "outing" her when that attempt failed miserably to hand Kerry the election. Plame outed herself. She wasn't a "covert" agent and hadn't been one for years. Nobody broke any laws when they revealed what Wilson and Plames agenda was and the lies they told to further that agenda! What Wilson and Plame did was hard ball politics at it's worst and when the Bush White House responded liberals started whining about poor Valerie being "outed". Here's a news flash for you kiddies...when you introduce your wife at Washington cocktail parties as someone who works for the CIA...SHE'S NOT A COVERT AGENT ANY MORE!!!!!!!!!! DUH?

Plame did not out herself, ya con tool...

"She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries," the document states. "When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson's employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States."​

... do you ever stop lying?

 

[Faun]

The FBI will find there was no classified information leaked and that rules and regulations were broken but no crime was committed
Hillary will be criticized in the report for using a private server and she will apologize and say she will never do it again

She had an illegal server, she deleted government emails that are under federal law.....she is a felon waiting for conviction.......she sold her office to the highest bidd er and then hid the corruption on her private server....

but hey......you guys have never cared about the law......so this won't matter either.....everything you guys touch turns to shit....and this is how you accomplish it.........

Home owned servers aren't illegal dipshit. Otherwise, Bush could have been impeached.

Your ignorance of the law continues to amaze, R-Derp...it's been illegal for government officials to hide their official communications from Congressional oversight since the Nixon years! The reason Hillary Clinton installed two private servers in her house and used them for ALL of her State Department business was that she didn't want a record of her dealings to be available for scrutiny. Think about that for a while...why would someone NEED to do that?

Still no answer? What security was installed on Hillary's email server?

I can tell you what security WASN'T installed on her two servers! The kind that the State Department has for IT'S official communications! The kind that isn't easy to hack!

Translation: you have no fucking clue what security she had.

Conclusion: you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

 

[MarcATL]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

Wow, a Democrat isn't going to be held responsible for the consequences of their own actions? I'm stunned. Knock me over with a feather ...

What were the consequences of her actions?

What sensitive information was leaked?
Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

We the people were harmed. Transparency and accountability are vital to our form of government. That is not to say she committed any crimes, that is for the FBI to decide, but principled Americans have a voice in the coming election. Hillary was wrong and it is more than a trivial matter regardless of criminality.

AKA, because I hate her guts, I believe she should FRY for anything I perceive she did that I don't like. It's really all about my feelings and not-so-much about the facts.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[2aguy]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

I'M FUCKING SHOCKED !!!!!

this can''t be right .. we'll need at least 9 more congressional investigations, and 6 more FBI/CIA probes before we appoint another Republican led Special Investigations Committee to get to the bottom of this email travesty.

es

Yes indeedy. We need to spend quite a few millions, if not billions, of American taxpayer's dollars to investigate what has already been investigated numerous times.

We don't need anymore investigations. We need an unbiased President who respects the Constitution and Rule of Law, an AG who is not crooked, and a DOJ that doesn't need to attend court-ordered Ethics classes for failing to legally carry out the enforcement of our laws in a fair/honest judicial manner.

And who would that president be? LOL As if there has ever been one. Maybe Jimmy Carter. That's about it. Nixon was a crook. Both Bushes were crooks. Reagan was a crook. You folks are partisans. You think Republican presidents are perfect and Democratic ones are complete failures and crooks. What BS. You're pathetic.

Nailed it.

Truth be told, most Republicans feel that Nixon was unjustly convicted. Since then they try to tear down Democrats by making them worse than Nixon the crook with statements like "X is worse than Nixon!"

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Nixon wasn't convicted of anything...bill "the rapist" clinton was impeached.

 

[2aguy]

The State Department itself made the case against Hillary violating both the FOIA and The Federal Records Act by declaring Hillary never turned over all State Dept-related e-mails and documents as required by the law.
It has been proven Barry's has been the most criminally non-compliant administration in US hostory regarding obeying the FOIA - 70% non-compliant, and it has been declared by Obama's own State Department that Hillary has been one of THE biggest offenders of breaking this law.

Barry and the WH made the case against Hillary be declaring info was found on her un-encrypted server 'so classified it could not be released in any format because it would cause grave danger to our national security' and by Barry, trying ineptly to defend her, declaring she had acted 'negligently'. Considering both those together, that is enough to prove her guilt regarding 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act.

The OP is correct, however - IMO, about how no charges will be forthcoming. In an act of MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Barry just made history by becoming the 1st President to endorse someone being investigated by HIS FBI, prematurely signaling there is no way he is going to allow an indictment.

He might as well have held a press conference and declared no matter what evidence is presented he will bever allow Hillary to be indicted.

Knowing all the facts, especially those listed above - admissions by our own govt - this is the easiest case in the world to see / prove guilt. Common Sense, even a spoonfull, dictates / shows Hillary is guilty as hell of breaking the law.

And Barry just declared by endorsing her that he will never allow his administration to indict her, adding the final proof that his is the most lawless in our nation's history.

Hillary Clinton is, nor ever was the subject of an FBI investigation. Stop lying!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

She is currently under FBI investigation...the FBI stated they do not do security checks....

 

[MarcATL]

Why can't our board Republicans answer a simple question?

You repeatedly call Hillary a crook and a criminal. You claim her crimes are worthy of imprisonment

What damage was actually done by Hillary having a private server?
What sensitive information was leaked? To whom? Who was harmed by her actions?

Thank you for demonstrating liberals don't give a damn when LIBERALS break the law.

'Yeah, she broke several laws, but what damage did it REALLY do?!'

That's something NO one will hear / read you say about Trump, attempting to minimize unethical, illegal activity.

When something does come up and it involves Trump or another Conservative remember you said this - I expect you to defend them the same way...or either ADMIT to being a HYPOCRITE.

I always get a good laugh when the very crowd who cheered Bush for commuting Libby's sentence after he was convicted, cry about how it's Liberals who don't give a damn about the law.

I know, right?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Why can't our board Republicans answer a simple question?

You repeatedly call Hillary a crook and a criminal. You claim her crimes are worthy of imprisonment

What damage was actually done by Hillary having a private server?
What sensitive information was leaked? To whom? Who was harmed by her actions?

Thank you for demonstrating liberals don't give a damn when LIBERALS break the law.

'Yeah, she broke several laws, but what damage did it REALLY do?!'

That's something NO one will hear / read you say about Trump, attempting to minimize unethical, illegal activity.

When something does come up and it involves Trump or another Conservative remember you said this - I expect you to defend them the same way...or either ADMIT to being a HYPOCRITE.

I always get a good laugh when the very crowd who cheered Bush for commuting Libby's sentence after he was convicted, cry about how it's Liberals who don't give a damn about the law.

The Bush administration intentionally released top secret information about the identity of a CIA agent

Republicans brushed it off and personally attacked the agent.

Yet, they want Hillary in jail and can't identify any specific damage from her actions

B...B...B...Buuuussshhhhh.

. There it is. Stay focused, RW. You're starting to come unglued and drift off topic....

I know your radical, partisan, lying A$$ isn't the LEAST bit interested in comparing the MEGACRIMES of the Bush Administration. They are legion.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapalk

 

[MarcATL]

I'M FUCKING SHOCKED !!!!!

this can''t be right .. we'll need at least 9 more congressional investigations, and 6 more FBI/CIA probes before we appoint another Republican led Special Investigations Committee to get to the bottom of this email travesty.

es

Yes indeedy. We need to spend quite a few millions, if not billions, of American taxpayer's dollars to investigate what has already been investigated numerous times.

We don't need anymore investigations. We need an unbiased President who respects the Constitution and Rule of Law, an AG who is not crooked, and a DOJ that doesn't need to attend court-ordered Ethics classes for failing to legally carry out the enforcement of our laws in a fair/honest judicial manner.

And who would that president be? LOL As if there has ever been one. Maybe Jimmy Carter. That's about it. Nixon was a crook. Both Bushes were crooks. Reagan was a crook. You folks are partisans. You think Republican presidents are perfect and Democratic ones are complete failures and crooks. What BS. You're pathetic.

Nailed it.

Truth be told, most Republicans feel that Nixon was unjustly convicted. Since then they try to tear down Democrats by making them worse than Nixon the crook with statements like "X is worse than Nixon!"

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Nixon wasn't convicted of anything...bill "the rapist" clinton was impeached.

So why did Nixon have to be pardoned?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

The State Department itself made the case against Hillary violating both the FOIA and The Federal Records Act by declaring Hillary never turned over all State Dept-related e-mails and documents as required by the law.
It has been proven Barry's has been the most criminally non-compliant administration in US hostory regarding obeying the FOIA - 70% non-compliant, and it has been declared by Obama's own State Department that Hillary has been one of THE biggest offenders of breaking this law.

Barry and the WH made the case against Hillary be declaring info was found on her un-encrypted server 'so classified it could not be released in any format because it would cause grave danger to our national security' and by Barry, trying ineptly to defend her, declaring she had acted 'negligently'. Considering both those together, that is enough to prove her guilt regarding 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act.

The OP is correct, however - IMO, about how no charges will be forthcoming. In an act of MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Barry just made history by becoming the 1st President to endorse someone being investigated by HIS FBI, prematurely signaling there is no way he is going to allow an indictment.

He might as well have held a press conference and declared no matter what evidence is presented he will bever allow Hillary to be indicted.

Knowing all the facts, especially those listed above - admissions by our own govt - this is the easiest case in the world to see / prove guilt. Common Sense, even a spoonfull, dictates / shows Hillary is guilty as hell of breaking the law.

And Barry just declared by endorsing her that he will never allow his administration to indict her, adding the final proof that his is the most lawless in our nation's history.

Hillary Clinton is, nor ever was the subject of an FBI investigation. Stop lying!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

She is currently under FBI investigation...the FBI stated they do not do security checks....

No she's not. Clearly you don't know the meaning if "being under investigation." She's not the subject, nor target of any ongoing FBI investigation.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Tehon]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

Wow, a Democrat isn't going to be held responsible for the consequences of their own actions? I'm stunned. Knock me over with a feather ...

What were the consequences of her actions?

What sensitive information was leaked?
Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

We the people were harmed. Transparency and accountability are vital to our form of government. That is not to say she committed any crimes, that is for the FBI to decide, but principled Americans have a voice in the coming election. Hillary was wrong and it is more than a trivial matter regardless of criminality.

AKA, because I hate her guts, I believe she should FRY for anything I perceive she did that I don't like. It's really all about my feelings and not-so-much about the facts.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

The fact is, and it is undeniable, she used a private server to conduct State business, a breach of the public's trust. That is the fundamental fact that gets lost in all the rhetoric about criminality. Deal with it.

 

[kaz]

Bad news for the fake-scandal peddlers, butthurt Bernie supporters and right-wing nuts from CNN in an article today (June 11th, 2016:

The FBI has not yet interviewed Clinton as part of its investigation. As CNN first reported, investigators have not found evidence to support criminal charges against Clinton and none are expected, but no final determination will be made until that interview has taken place.

FBI investigating drone emails as part of Clinton server probe - CNNPolitics.com

Wow, a Democrat isn't going to be held responsible for the consequences of their own actions? I'm stunned. Knock me over with a feather ...

What were the consequences of her actions?

What sensitive information was leaked?
Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

Who was harmed by Hillary having a private server?

We the people were harmed. Transparency and accountability are vital to our form of government. That is not to say she committed any crimes, that is for the FBI to decide, but principled Americans have a voice in the coming election. Hillary was wrong and it is more than a trivial matter regardless of criminality.

AKA, because I hate her guts, I believe she should FRY for anything I perceive she did that I don't like. It's really all about my feelings and not-so-much about the facts.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Actually you're the one doing that, Nancy. Theon said it's up to the FBI to investigate if crimes were committed, you're saying they were not. You're making the pure emotional argument. Do you even read posts when you respond to them?

 

[kaz]

The State Department itself made the case against Hillary violating both the FOIA and The Federal Records Act by declaring Hillary never turned over all State Dept-related e-mails and documents as required by the law.
It has been proven Barry's has been the most criminally non-compliant administration in US hostory regarding obeying the FOIA - 70% non-compliant, and it has been declared by Obama's own State Department that Hillary has been one of THE biggest offenders of breaking this law.

Barry and the WH made the case against Hillary be declaring info was found on her un-encrypted server 'so classified it could not be released in any format because it would cause grave danger to our national security' and by Barry, trying ineptly to defend her, declaring she had acted 'negligently'. Considering both those together, that is enough to prove her guilt regarding 'gross negligence' under the Espionage Act.

The OP is correct, however - IMO, about how no charges will be forthcoming. In an act of MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, Barry just made history by becoming the 1st President to endorse someone being investigated by HIS FBI, prematurely signaling there is no way he is going to allow an indictment.

He might as well have held a press conference and declared no matter what evidence is presented he will bever allow Hillary to be indicted.

Knowing all the facts, especially those listed above - admissions by our own govt - this is the easiest case in the world to see / prove guilt. Common Sense, even a spoonfull, dictates / shows Hillary is guilty as hell of breaking the law.

And Barry just declared by endorsing her that he will never allow his administration to indict her, adding the final proof that his is the most lawless in our nation's history.

Hillary Clinton is, nor ever was the subject of an FBI investigation. Stop lying!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

She is currently under FBI investigation...the FBI stated they do not do security checks....

No she's not. Clearly you don't know the meaning if "being under investigation." She's not the subject, nor target of any ongoing FBI investigation.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Her e-mail server is not her being under investigation? So if I shoot someone, it's my gun that's under investigation, not me? Dude, think ...

 

[jknowgood]

She voted for that war right? You blame Bush. Then you should also blame Hillary. Trump was against the Iraq war, if you were consistent, you would support him.

Bullshit. Trump was for the war before he was against it...

That was Hillary.

Sorry,but I recognize the voice in that video, supporting the war, to be Trump's, not Hillary's.

Hillary voted for that war, remember? You support her, and I guess that war now?

No, she did not vote for the war. The bill she voted for was to let Bush decide if it war was necessary. Neither Hillary nor anyone in Congress could ever have imagined Bush would pull the U.N. inspectors out in favor of war.

She supported and voted for the war no matter how hard you try to spin it. You support her so you are for the Iraq war.