“Confiscation could be an option”

Here's your right to keep and bear firearms right here.

IT'S NERF or NOTHING
B001RBWY14-1-sm.jpg

No reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia

How about this?
nerf-bazooka.jpeg
 
Not true, it's the shooter who is at fault, unless the one who had been shot was in the process of a crime.

Doesn't matter

Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

Wrong, asshole. You really don't know a thing about the law, do you?

Your kid takes your gun and shoots up a school, it is your responsibility

Not even close to being the same thing. Parents are often legally responsible for what their kids do. Of course, that point is academic in the Lanza case, don't you think?

You are responsible for insuring your car regardless of who is driving it....even if it is stolen

We should demand the same for guns
 
Doesn't matter

Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

Wrong, asshole. You really don't know a thing about the law, do you?

Your kid takes your gun and shoots up a school, it is your responsibility

Not even close to being the same thing. Parents are often legally responsible for what their kids do. Of course, that point is academic in the Lanza case, don't you think?

You are responsible for insuring your car regardless of who is driving it....even if it is stolen

You are a true idiot. If someone steals your car, you aren't responsible for a thing thief does with it. You're responsible for having insurance only if you drive the car on the street. If it sits in your garage, it doesn't need to be insured. Your claim is therefore absurd on its face.

We should demand the same for guns

Yes, we should, and we do already.
 
Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

As long as you are doing the gun car comparisons, tell me if some old idiot in their Chrysler minivan runs their car up a sidewalk and hits a bus bench killing 12 people does the government try to ban all Chrysler minivans? or do they prosecute the driver?
 
Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

As long as you are doing the gun car comparisons, tell me if some old idiot in their Chrysler minivan runs their car up a sidewalk and hits a bus bench killing 12 people does the government try to ban all Chrysler minivans? or do they prosecute the driver?

Do Chrysler minivans have a purpose other than to run over people, and look butt ugly?
 
Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

As long as you are doing the gun car comparisons, tell me if some old idiot in their Chrysler minivan runs their car up a sidewalk and hits a bus bench killing 12 people does the government try to ban all Chrysler minivans? or do they prosecute the driver?

We have intpstituted thousands of safety regulations on cars, roads, drivers and insurance

What have we done to reduce gun killings?
 
Far from it......

oh but no, you can't use a 21st century word to define the meaning of a word that was written in the l;ate 1700's

The floor is all yours

Tell us how we comply with a 1793 definition of regulated

Well Regulated

The Random House College Dictionary (1980) gives four definitions for the word "regulate," which were all in use during the Colonial period and one more definition dating from 1690 (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 1989). They are:

1) To control or direct by a rule, principle, method, etc.
2) To adjust to some standard or requirement as for amount, degree, etc.

3) To adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation.

4) To put in good order.
Meaning of the words in the Second Amendment
 
oh but no, you can't use a 21st century word to define the meaning of a word that was written in the l;ate 1700's

The floor is all yours

Tell us how we comply with a 1793 definition of regulated

Well Regulated

The Random House College Dictionary (1980) gives four definitions for the word "regulate," which were all in use during the Colonial period and one more definition dating from 1690 (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 1989). They are:

1) To control or direct by a rule, principle, method, etc.
2) To adjust to some standard or requirement as for amount, degree, etc.

3) To adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation.

4) To put in good order.
Meaning of the words in the Second Amendment

Our gun owners do not meet any of them
 
We have intpstituted thousands of safety regulations on cars, roads, drivers and insurance

What have we done to reduce gun killings?

I take it you have not read the the gun regulations currently on the books both Federal, and State
 
Last edited:
Best option

Insure the suckers for any damage they do. Buy as many guns as you wish, just carry insurance



I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it won't pass constitutional muster.

Requiring insurance discriminates against the poor...just like a poll tax.

And the Voter I.D. argument blows up in your collective faces on this proposal.

Out of one side of liberal mouths, they claim it denies the poor the right to vote to require an inexpensive (or free) picture identification while out of the other side they support an insurance requirement to exercise a constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment right.


Ignoring this won't make it go away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top