“Confiscation could be an option”

[BreezeWood]

The 2nd amendment gives us this right .. Next

Duh, only if you're in a militia... Are you in a militia...? Actually, no one is - because we have a standing socialist army.

No militia - no guns!

That's not true. From the Supreme Court ruling:

1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

That's not true. From the Supreme Court ruling: (No. 07–290. Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008)

not really sure but if the 2nd Amendment allows for Militia type weapons for the people - seems it would have been decided before June 26, 2008 ... or maybe that is the first court out of all the others to come to that conclusion, and not exactly a precedent ruling.

might keep tuned for future development.

 

[g5000]

December 22, 2012
by Jazz Shaw

In a radio interview on Thursday with Albany’s WGDJ-AM, New York governor Andrew Cuomo said that he plans to work with state legislators next month to submit a proposal for new gun-control laws; in particular, Cuomo said, “our focus is assault weapons,” because current state laws regulating the weapons “have more holes that Swiss cheese.”

“I don’t think legitimate sportsmen are going to say, ‘I need an assault weapon to go hunting,’” he said.

Cuomo continued, “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Read more at:
“Confiscation could be an option” « Hot Air

I suggest that before Gov. Cuomo call upon the citizens of NY state to control firearms more, or confiscate them,. He and his political cronies representing the the people of NY, in both Cities, State and Federal government surrender their weapons first. (emphasis mine)

It is interesting that Cuomo believes freedom is "holes".

.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Best option

Insure the suckers for any damage they do. Buy as many guns as you wish, just carry insurance

Liberals; Lets make a right so expensive people can't exercise it and then we can claim they still have the right but only the evul rich actually get too.

That's called a win win

 

[Two Thumbs]

Best option

Insure the suckers for any damage they do. Buy as many guns as you wish, just carry insurance

Homeowners policies already have blanket liability coverage.

But you are not forced to have it.

That's the difference

 

[Two Thumbs]

It probably means you're dead. Insurance won't matter much then.

Somebody is dead

Who should be held responsible? Your gun.....your responsibility

So how do you force criminals to buy insurance?

 

[emptystep]

Here's your right to keep and bear firearms right here.

IT'S NERF or NOTHING

 

[bripat9643]

It probably means you're dead. Insurance won't matter much then.

Somebody is dead

Who should be held responsible? Your gun.....your responsibility

The guy who killed someone should be held responsible, you clueless git.

 

[bripat9643]

Somebody is dead

Who should be held responsible? Your gun.....your responsibility

Not true, it's the shooter who is at fault, unless the one who had been shot was in the process of a crime.

Doesn't matter

Same with a car....somebody takes your car and kills someone it is your responsibility

Wrong, asshole. You really don't know a thing about the law, do you?

Your kid takes your gun and shoots up a school, it is your responsibility

Not even close to being the same thing. Parents are often legally responsible for what their kids do. Of course, that point is academic in the Lanza case, don't you think?

 

[Missourian]

Best option

Insure the suckers for any damage they do. Buy as many guns as you wish, just carry insurance

I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it won't pass constitutional muster.

Requiring insurance discriminates against the poor...just like a poll tax.

And the Voter I.D. argument blows up in your collective faces on this proposal.

Out of one side of liberal mouths, they claim it denies the poor the right to vote to require an inexpensive (or free) picture identification while out of the other side they support an insurance requirement to exercise a constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment right.

 

[Politico]

What the hell is wrong with you people? So you are ok with being charged with murder if your neighbor stabs someone with a corkscrew they borrowed from you?

Bullshit.

 

[Nova78]

Confiscation could be an option-

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Best option

Insure the suckers for any damage they do. Buy as many guns as you wish, just carry insurance

I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it won't pass constitutional muster.

Requiring insurance discriminates against the poor...just like a poll tax.

And the Voter I.D. argument blows up in your collective faces on this proposal.

Out of one side of liberal mouths, they claim it denies the poor the right to vote to require an inexpensive (or free) picture identification while out of the other side they support an insurance requirement to exercise a constitutionally guaranteed Second Amendment right.

But that's somehow different, I guess liberals will be saying the poor should move from those bad neighborhoods, if they live in so much fear they need a gun.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What the hell is wrong with you people? So you are ok with being charged with murder if your neighbor stabs someone with a corkscrew they borrowed from you?

Bullshit.

liberal logic couldn't pass gas much less Constitutional review.

 

[Lakhota]

Confiscation could become an issue if deranged NaziCons keep pushing and refusing to give an inch.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here's your right to keep and bear firearms right here.

IT'S NERF or NOTHING

No reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia

 

[Lakhota]

Here's your right to keep and bear firearms right here.

IT'S NERF or NOTHING

No reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia

What "well regulated militia"...? We have a standing socialist army.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here's your right to keep and bear firearms right here.

IT'S NERF or NOTHING

No reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia

What "well regulated militia"...? We have a standing socialist army.

Then you need to get the second amendment repealed, Good luck with that.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Confiscation could become an issue if deranged NaziCons keep pushing and refusing to give an inch.

You NAZICRATS have been given way to much.
Haven't you had enough blood on your hands with all the gun free zones?.

 

[Lakhota]

No reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia

What "well regulated militia"...? We have a standing socialist army.

Then you need to get the second amendment repealed, Good luck with that.

SCOTUS or Congress will eventually change the 2nd Amendment. Just a matter of time...

 

[Doc91678]

Confiscation could become an issue if deranged NaziCons keep pushing and refusing to give an inch.

Speaking of deranged and mentally impaired. The first name to pop up will be Lakhota's.