Congress Pushes for Weapons Pentagon Didn't Want

The republican congress is bought and paid for by the defense industries


Congress Pushes for Weapons Pentagon Didn't Want | Military.com

You didn't even read the article, did you, numskull?

Support for these projects is bipartisan. Ohio's Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown and Republican Senator Rob Portman both pushed hard to save funding for the Abrams tank and C-27J. Portman sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee and Brown on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
 
Troll OP leaves out this little tidbit

"Support for these projects is bipartisan. Ohio's Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown and Republican Senator Rob Portman both pushed hard to save funding for the Abrams tank and C-27J. Portman sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee and Brown on the Senate Appropriations Committee."

right from his own link
 
The republican congress is bought and paid for by the defense industries


Congress Pushes for Weapons Pentagon Didn't Want | Military.com

You didn't even read the article, did you, numskull?

Did you?

But the spending comes at a price, according to Pentagon and administration officials. "If members try to restore their favorite programs without regard to an overall strategy, the cuts will have to come from areas that could impact overall readiness," Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said in a May news briefing.

"Every dollar that is added will have to be offset by cuts in national security," Panetta added. "And if for some reason they do not want to comply with the Budget Control Act, then they would certainly be adding to the deficit, which only puts our national security further at risk."

These filthy fucking scum are bought and paid for.

Thanks, T. Great find.
 
The republican congress is bought and paid for by the defense industries


Congress Pushes for Weapons Pentagon Didn't Want | Military.com

You didn't even read the article, did you, numskull?

Did you?

But the spending comes at a price, according to Pentagon and administration officials. "If members try to restore their favorite programs without regard to an overall strategy, the cuts will have to come from areas that could impact overall readiness," Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said in a May news briefing.

"Every dollar that is added will have to be offset by cuts in national security," Panetta added. "And if for some reason they do not want to comply with the Budget Control Act, then they would certainly be adding to the deficit, which only puts our national security further at risk."

These filthy fucking scum are bought and paid for.

Thanks, T. Great find.

Pointing out the OP's misleading hyper-partisan troll bullshit is not the same as condoning the spending
 
The tank plant in Lima is a tough situation. I think it's the only Army tank plant in the country. If they don't do the upgrades it will most likely shutdown. There's no sense in wasting money on things we don't need (yeah, like this would be the only place the government is doing it ) but there will come a time where we will need to open a tank plant back up. Wonder what the cost and logistics would be of having to start back up from scratch compared to keeping it open with the unneeded Abram's upgrades.
 
That ratty little cocksucker from Tejas clamied bigpartisan support for invading various sovereign nations for reasons that make Reagan's being influenced by his wife's belief in astrology look rational. Yet fewer than half of congressional Democrats were sleazy enough to vote against more than two hundred years of history, so the claim of bipartisanship was a technical fact but a moral lie.

Same with this bill.

Get back to me when 51% of fake-liberal Democrats become degenerate enough to vote for continuing to piss money down the MIC drain. We all know they'd rather piss it down the human potential drain.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top