Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah...I should have guessed it. Every time devoted AGW spammers like you are faced with inconvenient facts you crawl into your usual 97% consensus rat hole....which in turn is totally bogusFor instance, greater than 97% of the world's climate scientists accept this "temperature trend garbage" as completely valid. And I'm quite certain they understand how it is processed better than you or I and, apparently, better than your complainant.
B.t.w. For your information this "complainant" who according to you does not understand how the data is processed is the head of Dendroclimatology, climate scenario development, data manipulation and visualisation, programming at the CRU East Anglia:For instance, greater than 97% of the world's climate scientists accept this "temperature trend garbage" as completely valid. And I'm quite certain they understand how it is processed better than you or I and, apparently, better than your complainant.
Ah...I should have guessed it. Every time devoted AGW spammers like you are faced with inconvenient facts you crawl into your usual 97% consensus rat hole....which in turn is totally bogusFor instance, greater than 97% of the world's climate scientists accept this "temperature trend garbage" as completely valid. And I'm quite certain they understand how it is processed better than you or I and, apparently, better than your complainant.
If 97% of your climate "scientists" agreed on picking computer programmers like the one who wrote that email to them outlining the problems of the programs they rely on and accept "as completely valid" then they sure as hell don`t have a clue what they are talking about...In other words they are almost right down at your level
B.t.w. For your information this "complainant" who according to you does not understand how the data is processed is the head of Dendroclimatology, climate scenario development, data manipulation and visualisation, programming at the CRU East Anglia:For instance, greater than 97% of the world's climate scientists accept this "temperature trend garbage" as completely valid. And I'm quite certain they understand how it is processed better than you or I and, apparently, better than your complainant.
Mr Ian (Harry) Harris![]()
Dendroclimatology, climate scenario development, data manipulation and visualisation, programming.
I`m quite certain he is not as dumb as you are but you could send an email to see if they could use an "expert" like you
Now it`s back to that again !!!B.t.w. For your information this "complainant" who according to you does not understand how the data is processed is the head of Dendroclimatology, climate scenario development, data manipulation and visualisation, programming at the CRU East Anglia:For instance, greater than 97% of the world's climate scientists accept this "temperature trend garbage" as completely valid. And I'm quite certain they understand how it is processed better than you or I and, apparently, better than your complainant.
Mr Ian (Harry) Harris![]()
Dendroclimatology, climate scenario development, data manipulation and visualisation, programming.
I`m quite certain he is not as dumb as you are but you could send an email to see if they could use an "expert" like you
Then why does Mr Harris believe that storing a number in binary will reduce it to an integer?
Oooops. Lots of wild values, even for TMP and PRE - and that's compared to the previous output!! Yes, this is comparing the automated 1901-2008 files with the 1901-June2006 files, not with CRu TS 2.1.
minmax rd0 2.5 binaries: -100.000 357.327
minmax rd0 2.5 binaries: -94.2232 250.621
minmax rd0 2.5 binaries: -93.0808 512.557
minmax rd0 2.5 binaries: -100.000 623.526
minmax rd0 2.5 binaries: -95.1105 521.668
The trouble is, when written to binary, these will be rounded to integer and a degree of accuracy will be lost.
Then there's the 0.5-degree converter
(rd0_gts_anom_05_m.pro), which has indescribably awful output values:
minmax rd0 0.5 binaries: -1.00000 8.33519
minmax rd0 0.5 binaries: -0.970328 8.13772
minmax rd0 0.5 binaries: -0.951749 4.33032
minmax rd0 0.5 binaries: -1.00000 9.26219
minmax rd0 0.5 binaries: -0.960226 3.80590