Constitutionality of Minority Rights: Does Show Minority, Only Having Rights(?)!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
People have noted that the Republicans have finally succeeded in making ACA not only popular, but an entitlement.

Widely un-noted is the ingenuity, of the federal concept at the national level. Many minority positions have been accommodated, all at once.

The Constitution allowed that the disaffected White Working Household minority could claim expression of their opinions, through the White House. The Constitution further allows that the Partisan majorities, controlling both federal legislatures, are independent of the Executive Branch, minority positions. The legislatures can create an alternative policy--in the same party, on their own. Then there is Bill of Rights, allowing Town Hall and Press Corp opinion and reporting. The Minority Partisan position, in both federal legislatures: Has been even able to claim its own ascendancy: In matters of national public policy. All of that has happened in the very same time frame.

Then on the whole, even the widespread "Like" of ACA has been formed. That will tend to favor Democrats 18 months later. And then even that is not guaranteed. The Minority Party in the legislatures will have to present some alternative claim to majority status.

Trump suggests Republicans will let ACA market collapse, then rewrite health law

One new impact may originate from the White House. There is the matter of any invitation to Vladimir Putin: To arrive in time to help Supervise the 2018 elections(?)!

"The Trump Family Zingers," do appear to have relatives in all kinds of places(?)!)

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great New Sitcom, of Blossoming Yellow-Hair, wallowing in Washington: Now fully underway!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top