Covid 19 deaths reported by cdc

now they can use probable numbers. hahahaahahahaha no one cares the accuracy of this fk up. and that's exactly what it is now, a fk up!
 
4/15/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
Meaningless
I agree. Fun to keep track of though, even when there aren't really any real statistics available.
"Meaningless" I don't agree. 'Not in the least.
Look at those first five numbers: 2405, 2860, 3603, 4513, 5443. They told me something was happening. I was half-excited about it. I wrote about it right then on April 3rd. I predicted that the death toll three days later on April 6th would be 8900 or less. It turned out to be 8910. Ehhh... 'Close enough. I knew we were on our way back and that something major had changed at the end of March. Moreover, I knew that hundreds of other Americans saw the same thing in those same five numbers.
Then I got confirmation from a hospital consultant who was using me as a resource, and he gave me a little inside information about recent hospital protocol for Covid-19. Yes, something changed nationwide. We will hear about it ad nauseum over the next few months, I'm sure.
Many of us may not be able to make sense out of data, but I have to believe that 'meaningless' was not used sincerely. Don't we all have a sense that the data we collect has a purpose, and will be interpreted for our benefit? That IS the truth.
meaningless because they aren't factual. so you go with your giddiness of nonsense data. I once played cowboys and indians as a kid, but I knew it was fiction. you think it's real. it isn't. just curious, have you seen the flu numbers? just wonder if those stats will get you off at all.
It's fun to speculate based on the cdc numbers, but you are absolutely correct that the Indians are not real. "Fun" speculation is all it can ever be. We cannot draw any quantitative conclusions without factual data.
yep, cause I'm irish and my friends were germans. none of us were cowboys or indians.
 
The 4/15 update is good news for lefties, after that lousy 310 on 4/14/20. I know lefties need that number to be as high as possible...
FAKE number 4/14/20 set a new world record for Trump-45 virus daily body count of 2,407 NOT the fake 310 CDC lie, and 4/15/20 Tramp is within 67 deaths of breaking his world record today and the day still has 6 hours to go!
CDC lies for Tramp, and you know it
Every figure in my table comes from the cdc site, and they are the ONLY figures that can pass as cdc figures. Your numbers do not pass as cdc figures, so they do not fit anywhere in my table. If you try to pass some other number off as a cdc number, it will be inaccurate and wrong.
As I pointed out Tramp's hand picked head of the CDC does not use the CDC FAKE numbers and neither does VPee Pants.
 
Post #89, numbers taken from other deaths. Nothing to do with Wuhan flu
BULLSHIT!
That is a White House LIE to make COVIDIOT Tramp look better, current Trump-45 virus body count is 33,490.
 
Meteor crashes into home killing two husbands in Byzaho,YN. Investigators locate a box of Hydroxichloroquine in their car outside.
C.O.D = Covid-19 (related)
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
6,000 that weren’t Wuhan flu.

When all they’re interested in is body count.
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
Actual 4/16/20 Trump-45 virus body count 34,617
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
Are you going to ignore the "26,930" number, which is comparable to the previous numbers? The CDC gives both numbers. You could consider keeping both. The CDC might decide to fill-in the missing "probable" numbers.
 
Last edited:
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
6,000 that weren’t Wuhan flu.

When all they’re interested in is body count.
The good part about this is that nobody is dying of anything else anymore.
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
Are you going to ignore the "26,930" number, which is comparable to the previous numbers? The CDC gives both numbers. You could consider keeping both. The CDC might decide to fill-in the missing "probable" numbers.
I have been calculating the first number in bold since the beginning, but I do not know if the "probable" number is a new thing.

Total deaths: 31,071 (26,930 confirmed; 4,141 probable)

If the two part figure is new, I should probably continue using the number in bold since the "probable" thing is likely there to inflate the number. I don't trust the cdc numbers, but if I am logging them I should keep to their intended goal.
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
6,000 that weren’t Wuhan flu.

When all they’re interested in is body count.
The good part about this is that nobody is dying of anything else anymore.
hahahahahahahahaha Exactly. I did say Trump would cure cancer and the left would be triggered. here's the evidence.
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
Are you going to ignore the "26,930" number, which is comparable to the previous numbers? The CDC gives both numbers. You could consider keeping both. The CDC might decide to fill-in the missing "probable" numbers.
I have been calculating the first number in bold since the beginning, but I do not know if the "probable" number is a new thing.

Total deaths: 31,071 (26,930 confirmed; 4,141 probable)

If the two part figure is new, I should probably continue using the number in bold since the "probable" thing is likely there to inflate the number. I don't trust the cdc numbers, but if I am logging them I should keep to their intended goal.
the probable number is indeed to inflate totals so they can say, see, see how many died? we were right. No, they were wrong. I know hospitals are not inflated with wuhan patients. just aren't in 99% of the country.
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
6,000 that weren’t Wuhan flu.

When all they’re interested in is body count.
The good part about this is that nobody is dying of anything else anymore.
hahahahahahahahaha Exactly. I did say Trump would cure cancer and the left would be triggered. here's the evidence.
Trump can certainly claim to have cured the flu since nobody is getting it anymore. That he has cured car wreck deaths and cancer as well is just a bonus.
 
4/17/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20---2,405
3/31/20---2,860-------------------455
4/1/20-----3,603-------------------743
4/2/20-----4,513-------------------910
4/3/20-----5,443-------------------930
4/4/20-----6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20-----7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20-----8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20-----12064------------------3154
4/8/20-----12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20-----14696------------------1942
4/10/20---16570------------------1874
4/11/20---18559------------------1989
4/12/20---20486------------------1927
4/13/20---21942------------------1456
4/14/20---22252------------------310
4/15/20---24582------------------2330
4/16/20---31071------------------6489
4/17/20---33049‐---‐-------------1978
 
4/16/20 update is posted at the cdc site so I'll update this chart:

Date---------Deaths to date-----Deaths since day before
3/30/20----------------------2,405
3/31/20----------------------2,860-------------------455
4/1/20------------------------3,603-------------------743
4/2/20------------------------4,513-------------------910
4/3/20------------------------5,443-------------------930
4/4/20------------------------6,593-------------------1,150
4/5/20------------------------7,616--------------‐----1,023
4/6/20------------------------8,910-------------------1,294
4/7/20------------------------12064------------------3154
4/8/20------------------------12754---‐--------------690
4/9/20------------------------14696------------------1942
4/10/20----------------------16570------------------1874
4/11/20----------------------18559------------------1989
4/12/20----------------------20486------------------1927
4/13/20----------------------21942------------------1456
4/14/20----------------------22252------------------310
4/15/20----------------------24582------------------2330
4/16/20----------------------31071------------------6489
Are you going to ignore the "26,930" number, which is comparable to the previous numbers? The CDC gives both numbers. You could consider keeping both. The CDC might decide to fill-in the missing "probable" numbers.
I have been calculating the first number in bold since the beginning, but I do not know if the "probable" number is a new thing.

Total deaths: 31,071 (26,930 confirmed; 4,141 probable)

If the two part figure is new, I should probably continue using the number in bold since the "probable" thing is likely there to inflate the number. I don't trust the cdc numbers, but if I am logging them I should keep to their intended goal.
OK. I see what they did. They are going to include the probable from now on.

My version of the data looks like this:

Date---------Deaths to 4:00 ET on previous day-----Deaths in previous 24 hours
4/13/20----------------------21942-------------------------------------1456
4/14/20----------------------22252-------------------------------------310
4/15/20----------------------24582-------------------------------------2330
4/16/20----------------------31071*------------------------------------2348
4/17/20----------------------33049‐---‐--------------------------------1978

* Probable Covid-19 deaths began being included.

You can see how the "6489" datum doesn't represent the death rate. Rather, it reflects a change in the CDC basis.

We are owed corrected data.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top