Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no pre-supposition inherent in the scientific method. Scientists may have their own presuppositions individually, but the scientific method will bear that out every time. That is what makes it so beautiful.
Yes more reading less posting I said absent of conjecture. So explain how molecular machines evolved absent of conjecture..
Conjecture? I'd say an explanation based on the Laws of Chemistry. You keep asking for how life could have started minus creation. It's been offered, but you don't seem to have the courtesy to debunk it scientifically. You just ask for more. It's like the fossil record, no amount of evidence will ever be enough because you're apparently intellectually dishonest.
Look at THIS! 346 pages, where some of the creationists are still posting! I just got to get me some "Crationists," given creationist fucktards managed to keep Darwin out of curriculum, until 1958, when the Soviets launched Sputnik. The more I read, from creationists, the more I realize it's time to rally, with the players and post some Carvey vids and history.
We re-green, or we lose the human habitat, to global climate change. See all the fires, droughts, floods, extreme storms, and coming sea level rise? You creationists are burning fossil fuels and whacking trees with chainsaws, with zero guilt or remorse, using you shit-rants about "God," to justify you awesome, destructive ignorance.
Some of you are Christians, lacking a Pope, so go see how Benedict now claims those ignorant of AGW are lacking religion, vis-a-vis atheism. Nice try, poopleman.
I have to subscribe to this thread, so I'm just checking in.
Wow, another Einstein checking in. And I'm guessing you don't shop at Walmart for cheap crap either, right? So its okay to totally devalue and polute someone else's country as long as it isn't ours? Oh, what's that? An iPhone in your pocket? Yeah, that's what I thought. You need to get away from the computer more often UN lacky boy. Climate change nonsensical science is about control, nothing more and nothing less.
Wow, another Einstein checking in. And I'm guessing you don't shop at Walmart for cheap crap either, right? So its okay to totally devalue and polute someone else's country as long as it isn't ours? Oh, what's that? An iPhone in your pocket? Yeah, that's what I thought. You need to get away from the computer more often UN lacky boy. Climate change nonsensical science is about control, nothing more and nothing less.
Hi, URanallyretarded! FYI, I shop at Walmart, for all kinds of convenient bargains, and I browse USMB, since the rules let me flame wingpunk-fucktards, like YOU, you ranting bitch.
WTF are you queer-ranting about, bitch? If there were not a drug war, for you anal retards to trip on, Henry Ford would have made all the plastic out of hemp, a CO2-neutral biomass source. By 1941, he had an indestructible version, shown on YouTube, getting hammered, with a sledge. How's that, up your stinky pussy?
Develop your hypothesis, about global climate change, try to distinguish, between climate change and global warming, and re climate change, warming is affecting change, so we will get more powerful storms, more floods, droughts, wildfires, desertification, and sea level rise.
When you are a creationist fucktard, your level of science doesn't include more than rants, so you don't use facts and issues, laid out, according to the scientific method.
While you are guessing, the planet IS heating up, and kindly notice your freaky heaters who let their irrational side get the better of them turned tricks and shot speed, to shove their dose of HIV, all the way, through AIDS and death.
Your bath-houses are closed, and the churches need to follow, queer.
Yes more reading less posting I said absent of conjecture. So explain how molecular machines evolved absent of conjecture..
Conjecture? I'd say an explanation based on the Laws of Chemistry. You keep asking for how life could have started minus creation. It's been offered, but you don't seem to have the courtesy to debunk it scientifically. You just ask for more. It's like the fossil record, no amount of evidence will ever be enough because you're apparently intellectually dishonest.
You too are living in fantasy land if you believe any explanation has come even close to explaining the origin of life. Let me explain to you how real science works since you all have been so retarded by the TOE speculation to fact methodology. Here goes: You come up with a hypothesis and then start doing experiments to prove or disprove your hypothesis. In real science, we don't come up with neat stories about finch beaks and giraffe necks that experimental data has not confirmed or denied. We test. If your postulations about the origins of life are so good, why isn't anyone moving from "we think this might have been responsible" to this experiment shows that bombarding amino acids with neutrino's caused them to self assemble into a dna-like structure. Or here, we have assembled a protein in the lab out of right-handed amino acids which is fully functioning just like the original. If it is so figured out, why don't we see documented experimental evidence coming out everyday? In fact, why can't scientist even produce a protein through a naturalistic process in the lab? I will tell you why. Because it is all BS and you are a fool for buying into it. The TOE has done more to set science back with its assumptive language and its UNTESTED "might haves" and "could haves". It has created a whole lot of buffoons who buy into the madness to support their metaphysical beliefs which include denial of the Creator.
Wow, another Einstein checking in. And I'm guessing you don't shop at Walmart for cheap crap either, right? So its okay to totally devalue and polute someone else's country as long as it isn't ours? Oh, what's that? An iPhone in your pocket? Yeah, that's what I thought. You need to get away from the computer more often UN lacky boy. Climate change nonsensical science is about control, nothing more and nothing less.
Hi, URanallyretarded! FYI, I shop at Walmart, for all kinds of convenient bargains, and I browse USMB, since the rules let me flame wingpunk-fucktards, like YOU, you ranting bitch.
WTF are you queer-ranting about, bitch? If there were not a drug war, for you anal retards to trip on, Henry Ford would have made all the plastic out of hemp, a CO2-neutral biomass source. By 1941, he had an indestructible version, shown on YouTube, getting hammered, with a sledge. How's that, up your stinky pussy?
Develop your hypothesis, about global climate change, try to distinguish, between climate change and global warming, and re climate change, warming is affecting change, so we will get more powerful storms, more floods, droughts, wildfires, desertification, and sea level rise.
When you are a creationist fucktard, your level of science doesn't include more than rants, so you don't use facts and issues, laid out, according to the scientific method.
While you are guessing, the planet IS heating up, and kindly notice your freaky heaters who let their irrational side get the better of them turned tricks and shot speed, to shove their dose of HIV, all the way, through AIDS and death.
Your bath-houses are closed, and the churches need to follow, queer.
Conjecture? I'd say an explanation based on the Laws of Chemistry. You keep asking for how life could have started minus creation. It's been offered, but you don't seem to have the courtesy to debunk it scientifically. You just ask for more. It's like the fossil record, no amount of evidence will ever be enough because you're apparently intellectually dishonest.
You too are living in fantasy land if you believe any explanation has come even close to explaining the origin of life. Let me explain to you how real science works since you all have been so retarded by the TOE speculation to fact methodology. Here goes: You come up with a hypothesis and then start doing experiments to prove or disprove your hypothesis. In real science, we don't come up with neat stories about finch beaks and giraffe necks that experimental data has not confirmed or denied. We test. If your postulations about the origins of life are so good, why isn't anyone moving from "we think this might have been responsible" to this experiment shows that bombarding amino acids with neutrino's caused them to self assemble into a dna-like structure. Or here, we have assembled a protein in the lab out of right-handed amino acids which is fully functioning just like the original. If it is so figured out, why don't we see documented experimental evidence coming out everyday? In fact, why can't scientist even produce a protein through a naturalistic process in the lab? I will tell you why. Because it is all BS and you are a fool for buying into it. The TOE has done more to set science back with its assumptive language and its UNTESTED "might haves" and "could haves". It has created a whole lot of buffoons who buy into the madness to support their metaphysical beliefs which include denial of the Creator.
Don't need a lecture from you. My entire career 35+ years has been in science at a major university. You apparently haven't read any of the site I posted or are aware that the types of experiments you describe are done daily. Results however don't come out daily, which you'd realize, if you weren't so caught up in your own prejudices. To do what you ask would take all the human lifetimes there ever were. Call it conjecture, if you will. I call it plausible and in line with what we what we know about chemistry.
Absence of the evidence you want, isn't evidence of the the incorrectness of evolution. You're blinded by your insistence that there must have been a Creation akin to Genesis. I'll give you one line, "Let there be light(The Big Bang)".
Scientists have found the Higgs Boson just three days ago.
Therefore, the argument that, for instance, string theory and multiverses are entirely unfounded because it is only based on math, is fallacious.
Wow, another Einstein checking in. And I'm guessing you don't shop at Walmart for cheap crap either, right? So its okay to totally devalue and polute someone else's country as long as it isn't ours? Oh, what's that? An iPhone in your pocket? Yeah, that's what I thought. You need to get away from the computer more often UN lacky boy. Climate change nonsensical science is about control, nothing more and nothing less.
Hi, URanallyretarded! FYI, I shop at Walmart, for all kinds of convenient bargains, and I browse USMB, since the rules let me flame wingpunk-fucktards, like YOU, you ranting bitch.
WTF are you queer-ranting about, bitch? If there were not a drug war, for you anal retards to trip on, Henry Ford would have made all the plastic out of hemp, a CO2-neutral biomass source. By 1941, he had an indestructible version, shown on YouTube, getting hammered, with a sledge. How's that, up your stinky pussy?
Develop your hypothesis, about global climate change, try to distinguish, between climate change and global warming, and re climate change, warming is affecting change, so we will get more powerful storms, more floods, droughts, wildfires, desertification, and sea level rise.
When you are a creationist fucktard, your level of science doesn't include more than rants, so you don't use facts and issues, laid out, according to the scientific method.
While you are guessing, the planet IS heating up, and kindly notice your freaky heaters who let their irrational side get the better of them turned tricks and shot speed, to shove their dose of HIV, all the way, through AIDS and death.
Your bath-houses are closed, and the churches need to follow, queer.
What are you 15 years old ?does your momma know you talk like this on the internet tough guy ?
I was not taught creationism nor do I think ultimatereality was either. For one he is an ID advocate I am the creationist. The University of Arizona does not have that class that I am aware of we both attended the bear down University. I worked in a lab for 11 years then I grew up.
Many people educated in the sciences do not agree with theories atheist hold dear.
Therefore, the argument that, for instance, string theory and multiverses are entirely unfounded because it is only based on math, is fallacious.
And there we have it. You making a metaphysical claim and then trying to say that math is the reason it could be true. Yes, and math is the reason God could be true too. How does it feel here in the boat with me?
Therefore, the argument that, for instance, string theory and multiverses are entirely unfounded because it is only based on math, is fallacious.
And there we have it. You making a metaphysical claim and then trying to say that math is the reason it could be true. Yes, and math is the reason God could be true too. How does it feel here in the boat with me?
How has math ever pointed to God? God does not show up in any equations, anywhere, ever. We are not even in the same ocean, let alone the same boat.
Hi, URanallyretarded! FYI, I shop at Walmart, for all kinds of convenient bargains, and I browse USMB, since the rules let me flame wingpunk-fucktards, like YOU, you ranting bitch.
WTF are you queer-ranting about, bitch? If there were not a drug war, for you anal retards to trip on, Henry Ford would have made all the plastic out of hemp, a CO2-neutral biomass source. By 1941, he had an indestructible version, shown on YouTube, getting hammered, with a sledge. How's that, up your stinky pussy?
Develop your hypothesis, about global climate change, try to distinguish, between climate change and global warming, and re climate change, warming is affecting change, so we will get more powerful storms, more floods, droughts, wildfires, desertification, and sea level rise.
When you are a creationist fucktard, your level of science doesn't include more than rants, so you don't use facts and issues, laid out, according to the scientific method.
While you are guessing, the planet IS heating up, and kindly notice your freaky heaters who let their irrational side get the better of them turned tricks and shot speed, to shove their dose of HIV, all the way, through AIDS and death.
Your bath-houses are closed, and the churches need to follow, queer.
What are you 15 years old ?does your momma know you talk like this on the internet tough guy ?
I was not taught creationism nor do I think ultimatereality was either. For one he is an ID advocate I am the creationist. The University of Arizona does not have that class that I am aware of we both attended the bear down University. I worked in a lab for 11 years then I grew up.
Many people educated in the sciences do not agree with theories atheist hold dear.
If you were believable, I'd say you got into a PAC-12 U, but you'd have to take off, after the first week of classes. Since your English-US isn't good enough for high schools, what the fuck are you doing, telling me you got into UA? Don't they have any standards? Dunces down, for Mr.Hugh, looks like.
What the fuck do YOU know, about "most people," you downie? Eat shit and write something intelligible, you miserable queer, who should have been aborted.
Hi, URanallyretarded! FYI, I shop at Walmart, for all kinds of convenient bargains, and I browse USMB, since the rules let me flame wingpunk-fucktards, like YOU, you ranting bitch.
WTF are you queer-ranting about, bitch? If there were not a drug war, for you anal retards to trip on, Henry Ford would have made all the plastic out of hemp, a CO2-neutral biomass source. By 1941, he had an indestructible version, shown on YouTube, getting hammered, with a sledge. How's that, up your stinky pussy?
Develop your hypothesis, about global climate change, try to distinguish, between climate change and global warming, and re climate change, warming is affecting change, so we will get more powerful storms, more floods, droughts, wildfires, desertification, and sea level rise.
When you are a creationist fucktard, your level of science doesn't include more than rants, so you don't use facts and issues, laid out, according to the scientific method.
While you are guessing, the planet IS heating up, and kindly notice your freaky heaters who let their irrational side get the better of them turned tricks and shot speed, to shove their dose of HIV, all the way, through AIDS and death.
Your bath-houses are closed, and the churches need to follow, queer.
What are you 15 years old ?does your momma know you talk like this on the internet tough guy ?
I was not taught creationism nor do I think ultimatereality was either. For one he is an ID advocate I am the creationist. The University of Arizona does not have that class that I am aware of we both attended the bear down University. I worked in a lab for 11 years then I grew up.
Many people educated in the sciences do not agree with theories atheist hold dear.
If you were believable, I'd say you got into a PAC-12 U, but you'd have to take off, after the first week of classes. Since your English-US isn't good enough for high schools, what the fuck are you doing, telling me you got into UA? Don't they have any standards? Dunces down, for Mr.Hugh, looks like.
What the fuck do YOU know, about "most people," you downie? Eat shit and write something intelligible, you miserable queer, who should have been aborted.
You have not said anything of substance at all. If you want to get into the specifics of science do so otherwise your resposes are not worthy of a reply.Therefore, the argument that, for instance, string theory and multiverses are entirely unfounded because it is only based on math, is fallacious.
And there we have it. You making a metaphysical claim and then trying to say that math is the reason it could be true. Yes, and math is the reason God could be true too. How does it feel here in the boat with me?
How has math ever pointed to God? God does not show up in any equations, anywhere, ever. We are not even in the same ocean, let alone the same boat.
What the fuck do YOU know, about "most people," you downie? Eat shit and write something intelligible, you miserable queer, who should have been aborted.What are you 15 years old ?does your momma know you talk like this on the internet tough guy ?
I was not taught creationism nor do I think ultimatereality was either. For one he is an ID advocate I am the creationist. The University of Arizona does not have that class that I am aware of we both attended the bear down University. I worked in a lab for 11 years then I grew up.
Many people educated in the sciences do not agree with theories atheist hold dear.
You are an english major trying to discuss science
I love internet courage. I guarantee you if we were having this conversation in person, you wouldn't be talking this way. Grow up.
And there we have it. You making a metaphysical claim and then trying to say that math is the reason it could be true. Yes, and math is the reason God could be true too. How does it feel here in the boat with me?
How has math ever pointed to God? God does not show up in any equations, anywhere, ever. We are not even in the same ocean, let alone the same boat.
Well one way is music, which is VERY mathematical and has absolutely no evolutionary reason to exist at all. Fine tuning of the universe is another way.
And there we have it. You making a metaphysical claim and then trying to say that math is the reason it could be true. Yes, and math is the reason God could be true too. How does it feel here in the boat with me?
How has math ever pointed to God? God does not show up in any equations, anywhere, ever. We are not even in the same ocean, let alone the same boat.
Well if you consider the evidence for design against the evidence of an unintelligent natural process creating everything we see,mathematics will be more supportive of a designer rather then this natural process you subscribe to.
