Creationists

[PMZ]

It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if there were compelling evidence to support it. It would be a fact, the opposite of conspiracy theory.

 

[Hollie]

It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if there were compelling evidence to support it. It would be a fact, the opposite of conspiracy theory.

We would call that "stating the obvious".

So where is the compelling evidence for aliens living among us and space alien / human hybrids?

 

[eots]

there is a body of evidence that would take hours to present to support the highly credible testimony but there is not conclusive physical evidence none of this is the case with your strawman...your argument is completely disingenuous I have no doubt if the worlds most respected evolutionist claimed in multitudes that they have seen evidence that conclusively proves evolutionary theory but it was being held and classified by the government and would not be released to the public and they where willing to petition the government for full disclosure and to testify before congress under oath you would not be babbling about Leprechauns...such is the nature of cognitive dissonance

Ah yes. I suppose an important component in the maintenance of your conspiracy theories are appeals to "classified government secrets" which shield the evidence for your space alien hybrid humans.

Odd that you claim that I am the one babbling when it is you who is screeching about space alien-human hybrids, for which you conveniently have no evidence for.

are you trying to imply these documents do not exist ? because that is not in dispute ..it is a fact they exist...what they contain is all that is in question..their are high ranking military involved in incidents that are willing to swear to under oath before congress and have petitioned to have the release of these incident reports

 

[PMZ]

It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if there were compelling evidence to support it. It would be a fact, the opposite of conspiracy theory.

We would call that "stating the obvious".

So where is the compelling evidence for aliens living among us and space alien / human hybrids?

To your first paragraph, I agree.

To your second, conspiracy theories aren't based on evidence. They are mythological.

 

[eots]

It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if there were compelling evidence to support it. It would be a fact, the opposite of conspiracy theory.

We would call that "stating the obvious".

So where is the compelling evidence for aliens living among us and space alien / human hybrids?

I would consider the sworn testimony of Apollo astronauts,Defense Minsters,High ranking Military that served in the positions of the highest national security as compelling.. I find much of the secondary evidence such as radar and photos to be compelling ..I find much of the archaeological evidence to be compelling.. anyone who would say its not is disconnected from reality and most likely an agenda driven individual coming from a place of Cognitive dissonance

 

[eots]

It wouldn't be a conspiracy theory if there were compelling evidence to support it. It would be a fact, the opposite of conspiracy theory.

We would call that "stating the obvious".

So where is the compelling evidence for aliens living among us and space alien / human hybrids?

To your first paragraph, I agree.

To your second, conspiracy theories aren't based on evidence. They are mythological.

There are endless example of of events labeled as conspiracy theory that were found to be true over time or with release of classified documents... people are found guilty of conspiracy charges all the time...your statement is completely baseless

 

[Hollie]

Ah yes. I suppose an important component in the maintenance of your conspiracy theories are appeals to "classified government secrets" which shield the evidence for your space alien hybrid humans.

Odd that you claim that I am the one babbling when it is you who is screeching about space alien-human hybrids, for which you conveniently have no evidence for.

are you trying to imply these documents do not exist ? because that is not in dispute ..it is a fact they exist...what they contain is all that is in question..their are high ranking military involved in incidents that are willing to swear to under oath before congress and have petitioned to have the release of these incident reports

So, let's sum up.

As to your conspiracy theory that space aliens are living among us and are breeding with humans, and is a part of a massive government cover up, you can produce zero evidence for this.

Great. Thanks.

Thanks again.

 

[eots]

are you trying to imply these documents do not exist ? because that is not in dispute ..it is a fact they exist...what they contain is all that is in question..their are high ranking military involved in incidents that are willing to swear to under oath before congress and have petitioned to have the release of these incident reports

So, let's sum up.

As to your conspiracy theory that space aliens are living among us and are breeding with humans, and is a part of a massive government cover up, you can produce zero evidence for this.

Great. Thanks.

Thanks again.

NO. TO SUM IT UP WE HAVE HIGHLY CREDIBLE PEOPLE BY ANY STANDARD WHO ARE WILLING TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH AS TO THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF ALIEN EXISTENCE AND SEEKING DISCLOSURE FROM CONGRESS OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SO THEY CAN PROVIDE THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR SWORN TESTIMONY .THIS INVOLVES NO THEORY.. THESE ARE THE FACTS...BUT DUE TO YOUR COGNITIVE DISSONANCE YOU ARE UNABLE TO PROCESS THESE FACTS IN ANY RATIONAL WAY

YOU ARE WELCOME...

 

[Hollie]

So, let's sum up.

As to your conspiracy theory that space aliens are living among us and are breeding with humans, and is a part of a massive government cover up, you can produce zero evidence for this.

Great. Thanks.

Thanks again.

NO. TO SUM IT UP WE HAVE HIGHLY CREDIBLE PEOPLE BY ANY STANDARD WHO ARE WILLING TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH AS TO THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF ALIEN EXISTENCE AND SEEKING DISCLOSURE FROM CONGRESS OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SO THEY CAN PROVIDE THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR SWORN TESTIMONY .THIS INVOLVES NO THEORY.. THESE ARE THE FACTS...BUT DUE TO YOUR COGNITIVE DISSONANCE YOU ARE UNABLE TO PROCESS THESE FACTS IN ANY RATIONAL WAY

YOU ARE WELCOME...

It's childish to respond as you did. You're behaving like a petulant child. You could have been honest and admitted your space alien conspiracy was fabrication, designed only to appeal to some lurid fantasy.

You will let us know when you have some actual evidence for space alien- human hybrids won't you?

Now, put down the modeling glue and go outside to play.

 

[newpolitics]

Others will claim that they have seen Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, Leprechauns and yes, even space aliens.

So yes, there is evidence for Leprechauns.

Happy, now?

An important consideration in wittiness testimony is credibility..you can provide no credible government or military personal that have held some the highest levels of national security clearance and are willing to testify before congress under oath as to the existence of Leprechauns .Loch Ness monster
Bigfoot or any of your other strawmen...

There is no such thing as a "credible eyewitness account" when it comes to supernatural claims, and the mere existence of faithful people is not evidence of the supernatural. This is an argument from popularity, at best. Name one criterion that allows a faithful person's testimony of the supernatural to be considered actual evidence.

 

[daws101]

if you hadn't noticed already eot's has no concept of :eyewitness testimony must be back by physical evidence to be credible.
the files (the holy grail of conspiracy) do exist but they themselves are not evidence .

 

[eots]

if you hadn't noticed already eot's has no concept of :eyewitness testimony must be back by physical evidence to be credible.
the files (the holy grail of conspiracy) do exist but they themselves are not evidence .

In a court of law, most credible evidence is introduced through the testimony of witnesses. These individuals may be people who saw the alleged crime or event actually occur, or they may be law enforcement officers or other officials who witnessed the aftermath or effects of the incident.

What Is Credible Evidence? (with picture)

 

[eots]

An important consideration in wittiness testimony is credibility..you can provide no credible government or military personal that have held some the highest levels of national security clearance and are willing to testify before congress under oath as to the existence of Leprechauns .Loch Ness monster
Bigfoot or any of your other strawmen...

There is no such thing as a "credible eyewitness account" when it comes to supernatural claims, and the mere existence of faithful people is not evidence of the supernatural. This is an argument from popularity, at best. Name one criterion that allows a faithful person's testimony of the supernatural to be considered actual evidence.

Apollo astronauts etc are not" faithful people" these are men of science and they are not giving testimony of the supernatural they are giving testimony of advanced technology witnessed and other life forms and have petitioned for disclosure of these incident reports and corroborating evidence to congress

 

[daws101]

if you hadn't noticed already eot's has no concept of :eyewitness testimony must be back by physical evidence to be credible.
the files (the holy grail of conspiracy) do exist but they themselves are not evidence .

In a court of law, most credible evidence is introduced through the testimony of witnesses. These individuals may be people who saw the alleged crime or event actually occur, or they may be law enforcement officers or other officials who witnessed the aftermath or effects of the incident.

What Is Credible Evidence? (with picture)

your point? their testimony by itself is not evidence..it must be linked to physical or forensic evidence to be acceptable if not it's hearsay or opinion
the real question is, why are you cruising these threads...?

 

[daws101]

There is no such thing as a "credible eyewitness account" when it comes to supernatural claims, and the mere existence of faithful people is not evidence of the supernatural. This is an argument from popularity, at best. Name one criterion that allows a faithful person's testimony of the supernatural to be considered actual evidence.

Apollo astronauts etc are not" faithful people" these are men of science and they are not giving testimony of the supernatural they are giving testimony of advanced technology witnessed and other life forms and have petitioned for disclosure of these incident reports and corroborating evidence to congress

you might wanna rethink your bullshit!:The following are a partial list of astronauts who were/are believers.

The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific RevolutionCommunion on the Moon - Buzz Aldrin - The first religious act performed on the moon (Apollo 11) was the Christian celebration of communion.

James Benson Irwin (Colonel, United States Air Force) - Apollo 15, July, 1971. He was the founding president of the High Flight Foundation, a Christian inter-denominational evangelical ministry based in Colorado Springs. Died in 1991.

Charles Moss Duke, Jr. (Brigadier General, USAF, Ret.) - Lunar module pilot of Apollo 16, April 16-27, 1972. He is an active speaker and Christian lay witness and President of Duke Ministry For Christ.

Space Shuttle Columbia Astronauts
Astronauts remembered at hometown churches - Both Rick Husband and Michael Anderson were committed Christians, who attended the same church, Grace Community Church.
'Tell Them About Jesus' -
People of Faith - Astronauts

 

[eots]

NO. TO SUM IT UP WE HAVE HIGHLY CREDIBLE PEOPLE BY ANY STANDARD WHO ARE WILLING TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH AS TO THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF ALIEN EXISTENCE AND SEEKING DISCLOSURE FROM CONGRESS OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SO THEY CAN PROVIDE THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THEIR SWORN TESTIMONY .THIS INVOLVES NO THEORY.. THESE ARE THE FACTS...BUT DUE TO YOUR COGNITIVE DISSONANCE YOU ARE UNABLE TO PROCESS THESE FACTS IN ANY RATIONAL WAY

YOU ARE WELCOME...

It's childish to respond as you did. You're behaving like a petulant child. You could have been honest and admitted your space alien conspiracy was fabrication, designed only to appeal to some lurid fantasy.

You will let us know when you have some actual evidence for space alien- human hybrids won't you?

Now, put down the modeling glue and go outside to play.

So your conspiracy theory is that Apollo astronauts and defense ministers..high raking military who controlled of nuclear arsenals are all
are all in collusion to fabricate a lurid fantasy fueled off of modeling glue and present it to congress ?? really ?...that's some active imagination you have I would love to hear more details of your conspiracy theory...please do

 

[Hollie]

It's childish to respond as you did. You're behaving like a petulant child. You could have been honest and admitted your space alien conspiracy was fabrication, designed only to appeal to some lurid fantasy.

You will let us know when you have some actual evidence for space alien- human hybrids won't you?

Now, put down the modeling glue and go outside to play.

So your conspiracy theory is that Apollo astronauts and defense ministers..high raking military who controlled of nuclear arsenals are all
are all in collusion to fabricate a lurid fantasy fueled off of modeling glue and present it to congress ?? really ?...that's some active imagination you have I would love to hear more details of your conspiracy theory...please do

The conspiracy theory is yours.

Strange, how after many, many posts, we're left with you insisting that there are aliens among us and that the existence of space alien / human interbreeding is a vast conspiracy of denial.

But you can produce no evidence.

How predictable.

 

[eots]

So your conspiracy theory is that Apollo astronauts and defense ministers..high raking military who controlled of nuclear arsenals are all
are all in collusion to fabricate a lurid fantasy fueled off of modeling glue and present it to congress ?? really ?...that's some active imagination you have I would love to hear more details of your conspiracy theory...please do

The conspiracy theory is yours.

Strange, how after many, many posts, we're left with you insisting that there are aliens among us and that the existence of space alien / human interbreeding is a vast conspiracy of denial.

But you can produce no evidence.

How predictable.

lol ..you can not provide a single post I claimed anything but the facts...I have personally made no claims of any kind...you however have put forth your theory it is all a lurid fantasy presented by astronauts etc to congress ...the conspiracy is clearly all yours ...I have presented only the facts and responded to these facts with theories of conspiracy you seem to be unable or unwilling to expand upon

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2FyONXh22M]Sent by Eisenhower to Meet an ALIEN - Amazing Confession of Ex Military - YouTube[/ame]

This video interview was displayed as part of the Citizen Hearing held April 30 - May 3, 2013, about ET disclosure and the cover up. This hearing was held in Washington, in front of six former US congressmen and congresswomen, as well as a US senator.

 

[Hollie]

The conspiracy theory is yours.

Strange, how after many, many posts, we're left with you insisting that there are aliens among us and that the existence of space alien / human interbreeding is a vast conspiracy of denial.

But you can produce no evidence.

How predictable.

lol ..you can not provide a single post I claimed anything but the facts...I have personally made no claims of any kind...you however have put forth your theory it is all a lurid fantasy presented by astronauts etc to congress ...the conspiracy is clearly all yours ...I have presented only the facts and responded to these facts with theories of conspiracy you seem to be unable or unwilling to expand upon

You're a bit confused regarding facts. In terms of how you haven't submitted a relevant fact to support your space alien / human interbreeding program, why are you wailing on about "facts"?

As conspiracy theories go, yours are mere pedestrian babbling.