Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Sep 4, 2014
- 30,837
- 20,610
If Mann had credible evidence he would not be hiding it from the court or scientists who wish verify and replicate his work. As this work was done on public grants the data and code is property of the US citizens who funded it.There is plenty of evidence.Science is science.
Yes it is...and when you are dealing with an observable, measurable quantity such as the movement of energy through the atmosphere, real science demands observed, measured, quantified data to support claims regarding said entity...So lets see it. Lets see a single piece of actual observed, measured, quantified data that supports the man made climate change hypothesis over natural variability....just one.
And the vast majority of climate scientists agree that MMGW is real.
Based on what? There is no actual evidence to support the hypothesis...what are they basing their agreement on?....if not actual data, then it must be money.
First you deniers ran in circles & crying about how they won't share data & now you claim is there is no data. Make up your minds because you are making yourselves look lime dumbasses
Where's the beef (data)?
Go back in this thread as your ignorant cohorts had a fit about Michael Mann supposedly hiding data.
What he is hiding is his lack of data...if he had strong data supporting his claim, he would have it posted on billboards, television ads, tv and radio and in practically every magazine out there...