Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,578
- 2,253
Yeah it really takes a Libtard to believe that one anonymous allegation of a nonspecified crime is worthy of impeachment, but over 2,000 sworn affidavits backed up with video is not worth investigating or cause in anyone to question the validity of an election.You are a moron. You and your ilk IMPEACHED an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE and now you are trying to disavow a video that clearly shows malfeasance. How about the video of the poll worker who ran the SAME stack of ballots TWICE. Go back to your basement.
It really take a libtard to believe such bullshit.
It is funny how Trump and Rudy have a number of affidavits and treats them like legal affidavits. It is a legal affidavit if it is presented in a court of law. If they are not presented in a court of law they are nothing more than opinions
The difference is that a judge can deem the affidavits as not creditable or inadmissible
By not submitting to a court then they hold them out as legal affidavits without having to bring it before a court. Big difference.
Yet the ones that he dares to bring before a court have been deemed inadmissible or not creditable.
So anyone can sign an affidavit but if it is not brought before a court of law it means nothing other that telling people that it can be presented in a legal case. It can and it can be found to be not creditable or inadmissible. Which could create legal problems for the signer.
The ones he did not submit well Rudy is not a complete idiot. He picks the one which seem creditable.
This thousands of affidavits are reduced to a dozen or so. Results are still the same
Case dismissed