Crooked Operative Filmed Pulling Out Suitcases of Ballots in Georgia IS IDENTIFIED

From the article:
Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Yeah, because THIS is not suspicious, palming a thumbdrive?
You guys need to get your stories straight across all these fraud claims.
For example, in this one, where you claimed a Dominion technician was "caught" inserting a thumb drive into the computer and "manipulating votes".

*I* did not claim that, I am saying it is obviously suspicious activity and belies the claim that there was none.

The most likely explanation though is it isn't a thumb drive at all. You can't tell what the hell it is. It could be chapstick or a tampon, but you've created an entire conspiracy theory out of something that "looks suspicious" but you have no idea so you are willing to destroy lives without verifying anything.

Yeah, people look all around to make sure no one is watching, palm a chapstick and then slip it in someones pocket while they pretend to not notice all the time. Sure, go with that. ;)

The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers -- not suitcases -- and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present.
'Suitcases' is just a nickname from the people that work at these ballot counting centers, because the containers have an extendable handle like a suitcase. No one truly believes that these are literal suitcases, OMG.
I disagree with you here. It's not just a nickname. People making the claim were implying that they were brought in from somewhere else secretly in suitcases or totes. People really are that dumb.

Yeah, and some people believed that Davey Crocket could ride on lightning bolts too, but that does nto prove that any reliable source ever cclaimed it was true.

The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said.
Bullshit, they were told to leave due to the burst pipe, and the workers were not supposed to stay and count all night without an observer/minotor from both candidates campaign teams.
1. The Fulton County burst pipe occurred at 6am on Tuesday, delaying the start of the absentee ballot counting. This does not correspond to the time table of the supposed "suitcases of fake ballots being counted" when people were supposedly "told to leave".

Yes you are correct as to the time frame, but why lie about it and pretend to be fixing it for four hours? They wanted to push the vote into the wee hours of the morning where they could carry on their ballot bullshit.

2. No one was told to leave.
There are sworn affidavits from two poll watchers that say that they were told to leave. They made these statements under risk of perjury if proven false.
I'll take THEIR word for what happened.



:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.
At least three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, poll workers, or absentee ballot clerks must be present before commencing; and three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks shall be Present at all times while the outer envelopes are being opened. After opening the outer envelopes, the ballots shall be safely and securely stored until the time for tabulating such ballots....
Such committee shall have the right to designate two persons and each independent and nonpartisan candidate whose name appears on the ballot for such election in such county shall have the right to designate one person to act as monitors for such process. ...
Why do you think monitors are required? To make sure everything is valid and not having votes secreted away and brought in for tally that have no chain of custody.
And at least three persons were present (see Sterling's statement). What's the point here?

Sorry, but I will believe my own two eyes and what they saw on the video before I believe some lying suit.

Why do you think these suitcases of ballots were hidden? How does that NOT break the chain of custody?
No votes were "secreted away" - no votes were "hidden".

Because putting ballots under a table that has a cloth all around it isnt really hiding them? :rolleyes:

FIVE STATES all stopped counting in the night, and *POOF* Biden is ahead when they resume, overcoming a Trump lead of thousands of votes, but that is all 'normal' for Democrats? roflmao
Everyone fully EXPECTED that Biden's lead would grow because the absentee votes were counted after the in person votes, and in many cases, absentee ballots were not allowed to be even PROCESSED (envelopes removed, signatures verified, etc etc) until after the polls closed. It's no surprise that Biden jumped ahead late, even the Republicans expected it based on how hard they tried to restrict the counting of absentee votes.

And I expected Biden to recover some ground as well, but not in 6 digit spikes that came faster than machines at locations could possible scan physically.
1607284396479.png




I have full confidence that when rational people with an IQ over room temperature sees this video that they will believe their own two eyes, not Democrat lies.
I have little confidence in your ability rate IQ's. :doubt:

Well there's an easy one, lol.

Seriously, people with book oriented intelligence are fairly gullible and reliant on authority figures to give them what they believe to be Truth and do not process the data for validity and conformity to the world around them. Your acceptance of the GA SoS's word that nothing is ammiss or suspicious in the things revealed on video tape is an example of this.
You accept the word of an unsworn authority figure over what is plainly shown by video that you can see with your own two eye's.

That is not low IQ, it is very high 'Gullibility Quotient'.[/QUOTE]
 
From the article:
Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Yeah, because THIS is not suspicious, palming a thumbdrive?
You guys need to get your stories straight across all these fraud claims.
For example, in this one, where you claimed a Dominion technician was "caught" inserting a thumb drive into the computer and "manipulating votes".

*I* did not claim that, I am saying it is obviously suspicious activity and belies the claim that there was none.

The most likely explanation though is it isn't a thumb drive at all. You can't tell what the hell it is. It could be chapstick or a tampon, but you've created an entire conspiracy theory out of something that "looks suspicious" but you have no idea so you are willing to destroy lives without verifying anything.

Yeah, people look all around to make sure no one is watching, palm a chapstick and then slip it in someones pocket while they pretend to not notice all the time. Sure, go with that. ;)

The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers -- not suitcases -- and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present.
'Suitcases' is just a nickname from the people that work at these ballot counting centers, because the containers have an extendable handle like a suitcase. No one truly believes that these are literal suitcases, OMG.
I disagree with you here. It's not just a nickname. People making the claim were implying that they were brought in from somewhere else secretly in suitcases or totes. People really are that dumb.

Yeah, and some people believed that Davey Crocket could ride on lightning bolts too, but that does nto prove that any reliable source ever cclaimed it was true.

The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said.
Bullshit, they were told to leave due to the burst pipe, and the workers were not supposed to stay and count all night without an observer/minotor from both candidates campaign teams.
1. The Fulton County burst pipe occurred at 6am on Tuesday, delaying the start of the absentee ballot counting. This does not correspond to the time table of the supposed "suitcases of fake ballots being counted" when people were supposedly "told to leave".

Yes you are correct as to the time frame, but why lie about it and pretend to be fixing it for four hours? They wanted to push the vote into the wee hours of the morning where they could carry on their ballot bullshit.

2. No one was told to leave.
There are sworn affidavits from two poll watchers that say that they were told to leave. They made these statements under risk of perjury if proven false.
I'll take THEIR word for what happened.



:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.
At least three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, poll workers, or absentee ballot clerks must be present before commencing; and three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks shall be Present at all times while the outer envelopes are being opened. After opening the outer envelopes, the ballots shall be safely and securely stored until the time for tabulating such ballots....
Such committee shall have the right to designate two persons and each independent and nonpartisan candidate whose name appears on the ballot for such election in such county shall have the right to designate one person to act as monitors for such process. ...
Why do you think monitors are required? To make sure everything is valid and not having votes secreted away and brought in for tally that have no chain of custody.
And at least three persons were present (see Sterling's statement). What's the point here?

Sorry, but I will believe my own two eyes and what they saw on the video before I believe some lying suit.

Why do you think these suitcases of ballots were hidden? How does that NOT break the chain of custody?
No votes were "secreted away" - no votes were "hidden".

Because putting ballots under a table that has a cloth all around it isnt really hiding them? :rolleyes:

FIVE STATES all stopped counting in the night, and *POOF* Biden is ahead when they resume, overcoming a Trump lead of thousands of votes, but that is all 'normal' for Democrats? roflmao
Everyone fully EXPECTED that Biden's lead would grow because the absentee votes were counted after the in person votes, and in many cases, absentee ballots were not allowed to be even PROCESSED (envelopes removed, signatures verified, etc etc) until after the polls closed. It's no surprise that Biden jumped ahead late, even the Republicans expected it based on how hard they tried to restrict the counting of absentee votes.

And I expected Biden to recover some ground as well, but not in 6 digit spikes that came faster than machines at locations could possible scan physically.
View attachment 425870



I have full confidence that when rational people with an IQ over room temperature sees this video that they will believe their own two eyes, not Democrat lies.
I have little confidence in your ability rate IQ's. :doubt:

Well there's an easy one, lol.

Seriously, people with book oriented intelligence are fairly gullible and reliant on authority figures to give them what they believe to be Truth and do not process the data for validity and conformity to the world around them. Your acceptance of the GA SoS's word that nothing is ammiss or suspicious in the things revealed on video tape is an example of this.
You accept the word of an unsworn authority figure over what is plainly shown by video that you can see with your own two eye's.

That is not low IQ, it is very high 'Gullibility Quotient'.
[/QUOTE]
The people who refuse to see the evidence have been thoroughly indoctrinated by our public education system and lack ANY ability to think critically.
 
Shame for her as it looks like she has had a nice little boutique business.
You're destroying people relying on totally unfounded evidence? Salem ring a bell? Just stoppit. The SoS is investigating this. If he finds she did anything wrong, she'll be arrested. But you've skipped the important step--seeing if she did anything wrong first. Watching an unexplained video of security footage without any explanation of what was going on is not how it's done.
There are none so blind as those who will not see. WATCH THE VIDEO, MYOPIC OLD LADY!
Shouting at me isn't going to do a damned thing for ya, noob. Read Coyote's post 269 which indeed explains that they were doing their jobs. Nothing more.
 
From the article:
Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Yeah, because THIS is not suspicious, palming a thumbdrive?
You guys need to get your stories straight across all these fraud claims.
For example, in this one, where you claimed a Dominion technician was "caught" inserting a thumb drive into the computer and "manipulating votes".

*I* did not claim that, I am saying it is obviously suspicious activity and belies the claim that there was none.

The most likely explanation though is it isn't a thumb drive at all. You can't tell what the hell it is. It could be chapstick or a tampon, but you've created an entire conspiracy theory out of something that "looks suspicious" but you have no idea so you are willing to destroy lives without verifying anything.

Yeah, people look all around to make sure no one is watching, palm a chapstick and then slip it in someones pocket while they pretend to not notice all the time. Sure, go with that. ;)

The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers -- not suitcases -- and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present.
'Suitcases' is just a nickname from the people that work at these ballot counting centers, because the containers have an extendable handle like a suitcase. No one truly believes that these are literal suitcases, OMG.
I disagree with you here. It's not just a nickname. People making the claim were implying that they were brought in from somewhere else secretly in suitcases or totes. People really are that dumb.

Yeah, and some people believed that Davey Crocket could ride on lightning bolts too, but that does nto prove that any reliable source ever cclaimed it was true.

The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said.
Bullshit, they were told to leave due to the burst pipe, and the workers were not supposed to stay and count all night without an observer/minotor from both candidates campaign teams.
1. The Fulton County burst pipe occurred at 6am on Tuesday, delaying the start of the absentee ballot counting. This does not correspond to the time table of the supposed "suitcases of fake ballots being counted" when people were supposedly "told to leave".

Yes you are correct as to the time frame, but why lie about it and pretend to be fixing it for four hours? They wanted to push the vote into the wee hours of the morning where they could carry on their ballot bullshit.

2. No one was told to leave.
There are sworn affidavits from two poll watchers that say that they were told to leave. They made these statements under risk of perjury if proven false.
I'll take THEIR word for what happened.



:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.
At least three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, poll workers, or absentee ballot clerks must be present before commencing; and three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks shall be Present at all times while the outer envelopes are being opened. After opening the outer envelopes, the ballots shall be safely and securely stored until the time for tabulating such ballots....
Such committee shall have the right to designate two persons and each independent and nonpartisan candidate whose name appears on the ballot for such election in such county shall have the right to designate one person to act as monitors for such process. ...
Why do you think monitors are required? To make sure everything is valid and not having votes secreted away and brought in for tally that have no chain of custody.
And at least three persons were present (see Sterling's statement). What's the point here?

Sorry, but I will believe my own two eyes and what they saw on the video before I believe some lying suit.

Why do you think these suitcases of ballots were hidden? How does that NOT break the chain of custody?
No votes were "secreted away" - no votes were "hidden".

Because putting ballots under a table that has a cloth all around it isnt really hiding them? :rolleyes:

FIVE STATES all stopped counting in the night, and *POOF* Biden is ahead when they resume, overcoming a Trump lead of thousands of votes, but that is all 'normal' for Democrats? roflmao
Everyone fully EXPECTED that Biden's lead would grow because the absentee votes were counted after the in person votes, and in many cases, absentee ballots were not allowed to be even PROCESSED (envelopes removed, signatures verified, etc etc) until after the polls closed. It's no surprise that Biden jumped ahead late, even the Republicans expected it based on how hard they tried to restrict the counting of absentee votes.

And I expected Biden to recover some ground as well, but not in 6 digit spikes that came faster than machines at locations could possible scan physically.
View attachment 425870



I have full confidence that when rational people with an IQ over room temperature sees this video that they will believe their own two eyes, not Democrat lies.
I have little confidence in your ability rate IQ's. :doubt:

Well there's an easy one, lol.

Seriously, people with book oriented intelligence are fairly gullible and reliant on authority figures to give them what they believe to be Truth and do not process the data for validity and conformity to the world around them. Your acceptance of the GA SoS's word that nothing is ammiss or suspicious in the things revealed on video tape is an example of this.
You accept the word of an unsworn authority figure over what is plainly shown by video that you can see with your own two eye's.

That is not low IQ, it is very high 'Gullibility Quotient'.
[/QUOTE]
They also ignore Ruby inserting a single ballot three times. The testifier in Michigan covered that when she explain the 'white out'. They white out the bar code and it can be put through again an again. Plus all those boxes of ballots along the wall that were said to be from the primary which was also a farce.
 
the video shows otherwise,,, you can clearly see them leaving all at once after the person walked around and what seemed to be being telling them to leave,,,

The video shows nothing. The number of votes counted were consistent with the number of people voting. Also election officials were present. You people are garbage.
 
the video shows otherwise,,, you can clearly see them leaving all at once after the person walked around and what seemed to be being telling them to leave,,,

The video shows nothing. The number of votes counted were consistent with the number of people voting. Also election officials were present. You people are garbage.
wrong,,,
 
When you have something other than empty words and articles from RW Websites that traffic in lies and distortions it might help.

40+ Losses.

1 - Win.

1- Set Aside.

No Voter Fraud/No Election Fraud.

You accept lies because as Jack Nicholson said in "A Few Good Men", YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!

I never said I accepted anything. What I have said repeatedly is that if a claim looks legitimate, they should look at it more closely.
 
From the article:
Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Yeah, because THIS is not suspicious, palming a thumbdrive?
You guys need to get your stories straight across all these fraud claims.
For example, in this one, where you claimed a Dominion technician was "caught" inserting a thumb drive into the computer and "manipulating votes".

*I* did not claim that, I am saying it is obviously suspicious activity and belies the claim that there was none.

The most likely explanation though is it isn't a thumb drive at all. You can't tell what the hell it is. It could be chapstick or a tampon, but you've created an entire conspiracy theory out of something that "looks suspicious" but you have no idea so you are willing to destroy lives without verifying anything.

Yeah, people look all around to make sure no one is watching, palm a chapstick and then slip it in someones pocket while they pretend to not notice all the time. Sure, go with that. ;)

The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers -- not suitcases -- and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present.
'Suitcases' is just a nickname from the people that work at these ballot counting centers, because the containers have an extendable handle like a suitcase. No one truly believes that these are literal suitcases, OMG.
I disagree with you here. It's not just a nickname. People making the claim were implying that they were brought in from somewhere else secretly in suitcases or totes. People really are that dumb.

Yeah, and some people believed that Davey Crocket could ride on lightning bolts too, but that does nto prove that any reliable source ever cclaimed it was true.

The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said.
Bullshit, they were told to leave due to the burst pipe, and the workers were not supposed to stay and count all night without an observer/minotor from both candidates campaign teams.
1. The Fulton County burst pipe occurred at 6am on Tuesday, delaying the start of the absentee ballot counting. This does not correspond to the time table of the supposed "suitcases of fake ballots being counted" when people were supposedly "told to leave".

Yes you are correct as to the time frame, but why lie about it and pretend to be fixing it for four hours? They wanted to push the vote into the wee hours of the morning where they could carry on their ballot bullshit.

2. No one was told to leave.
There are sworn affidavits from two poll watchers that say that they were told to leave. They made these statements under risk of perjury if proven false.
I'll take THEIR word for what happened.



:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.
At least three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, poll workers, or absentee ballot clerks must be present before commencing; and three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks shall be Present at all times while the outer envelopes are being opened. After opening the outer envelopes, the ballots shall be safely and securely stored until the time for tabulating such ballots....
Such committee shall have the right to designate two persons and each independent and nonpartisan candidate whose name appears on the ballot for such election in such county shall have the right to designate one person to act as monitors for such process. ...
Why do you think monitors are required? To make sure everything is valid and not having votes secreted away and brought in for tally that have no chain of custody.
And at least three persons were present (see Sterling's statement). What's the point here?

Sorry, but I will believe my own two eyes and what they saw on the video before I believe some lying suit.

Why do you think these suitcases of ballots were hidden? How does that NOT break the chain of custody?
No votes were "secreted away" - no votes were "hidden".

Because putting ballots under a table that has a cloth all around it isnt really hiding them? :rolleyes:

FIVE STATES all stopped counting in the night, and *POOF* Biden is ahead when they resume, overcoming a Trump lead of thousands of votes, but that is all 'normal' for Democrats? roflmao
Everyone fully EXPECTED that Biden's lead would grow because the absentee votes were counted after the in person votes, and in many cases, absentee ballots were not allowed to be even PROCESSED (envelopes removed, signatures verified, etc etc) until after the polls closed. It's no surprise that Biden jumped ahead late, even the Republicans expected it based on how hard they tried to restrict the counting of absentee votes.

And I expected Biden to recover some ground as well, but not in 6 digit spikes that came faster than machines at locations could possible scan physically.
View attachment 425870



I have full confidence that when rational people with an IQ over room temperature sees this video that they will believe their own two eyes, not Democrat lies.
I have little confidence in your ability rate IQ's. :doubt:

Well there's an easy one, lol.

Seriously, people with book oriented intelligence are fairly gullible and reliant on authority figures to give them what they believe to be Truth and do not process the data for validity and conformity to the world around them. Your acceptance of the GA SoS's word that nothing is ammiss or suspicious in the things revealed on video tape is an example of this.
You accept the word of an unsworn authority figure over what is plainly shown by video that you can see with your own two eye's.

That is not low IQ, it is very high 'Gullibility Quotient'.
They also ignore Ruby inserting a single ballot three times. The testifier in Michigan covered that when she explain the 'white out'. They white out the bar code and it can be put through again an again. Plus all those boxes of ballots along the wall that were said to be from the primary which was also a farce.
[/QUOTE]

A Republican legislator pointed out that the number of votes and the number of voters would be off by 30,000 votes. The only thing Ruby did was insert 100 proof into her system. Even Giuliani was trying to shut her up.
 
the video shows otherwise,,, you can clearly see them leaving all at once after the person walked around and what seemed to be being telling them to leave,,,

The video shows nothing. The number of votes counted were consistent with the number of people voting. Also election officials were present. You people are garbage.
wrong,,,

It is very right. The number of votes and the number of voters should balance which they did. The fact is that it was investigated by election officials and they examined all of the video footage. They found nothing wrong. You refuse to believe it because you are a brainless fool as well as garbage.
 
Shame for her as it looks like she has had a nice little boutique business.
You're destroying people relying on totally unfounded evidence? Salem ring a bell? Just stoppit. The SoS is investigating this. If he finds she did anything wrong, she'll be arrested. But you've skipped the important step--seeing if she did anything wrong first. Watching an unexplained video of security footage without any explanation of what was going on is not how it's done.
There are none so blind as those who will not see. WATCH THE VIDEO, MYOPIC OLD LADY!
Shouting at me isn't going to do a damned thing for ya, noob. Read Coyote's post 269 which indeed explains that they were doing their jobs. Nothing more.
You are a moron. You and your ilk IMPEACHED an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE and now you are trying to disavow a video that clearly shows malfeasance. How about the video of the poll worker who ran the SAME stack of ballots TWICE. Go back to your basement.
 
You are a moron. You and your ilk IMPEACHED an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE and now you are trying to disavow a video that clearly shows malfeasance. How about the video of the poll worker who ran the SAME stack of ballots TWICE. Go back to your basement.
Yeah it really takes a Libtard to believe that one anonymous allegation of a nonspecified crime is worthy of impeachment, but over 2,000 sworn affidavits backed up with video is not worth investigating or cause in anyone to question the validity of an election.

It really take a libtard to believe such bullshit.
 
Nothing in the post above offers ANY proof that fraud did not occur
:thankusmile: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: The dnc is really paying this shill major bucks to lie
Knowing how she engages in lies all the time and never looks at facts I have no doubt you are correct,I’m not about to read through that Bible length babble,I salute you for being able to read through that garbage Bible length babble,don’t know how you do it.

First she was pulling suitcases from under the table and right wingers claimed she was doing something fraudulent

when official says she was preparing votes to be scanned as was the rest of the people in the room which was what she was suppose to be doing. Wrong conclusion drawn by people looking for anything that will float on the internet.

Then there is a video which right wingers are saying shows a USB being passed to someone which to them indicates guilt and fraud.

Yet the video at best is inconclusive and you cannot see what was in her hand. 2nd explain how a USB could be used to commit fraud by her. Votes are check manually for completeness and validity. The vote is recorded manually. It is then boxed for later scanning into the main voting system. A scanning device is used to scan the votes Votes are counted manually and are scanned and the totals are compared. Any discrepancies has to be accounted for or recounted.

So explain how a USB in this process by a worker to commit fraud? Especially if a USB cannot even be verified that was in her hand.

Finally now the story shifts to something she did 10 years ago. You say she should not have been hired. Does the bible preach forgiveness? or is it more selective based on political rhetoric?

People make mistakes. They still need to make money in legitimate ways. Trump has pardon people who have committed murder but hey they must get on with their lives.

Still this is a country of laws. Innocent until proven guilty. If she committed fraud which is punishable then the court will determine guilt.
 
Last edited:
All these voting machines had access to the internet during the counting, the voting and the tallying.

That makes the whole election BULLSHIT for the gitgo.

Absolutely. Why are we using software that can easily be compromised, even over the internet? I've posted Colonel Waldron's testimony several times, and not one leftist commented on what he said because they didn't watch it. They know what this military man had to say is the absolute truth.
yeah they wont touch what he said sense he is too credible.
 
Last edited:
Nothing in the post above offers ANY proof that fraud did not occur
:thankusmile: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: The dnc is really paying this shill major bucks to lie
Knowing how she engages in lies all the time and never looks at facts I have no doubt you are correct,I’m not about to read through that Bible length babble,I salute you for being able to read through that garbage Bible length babble,don’t know how you do it.

First she was pulling suitcases from under the table and right wingers claimed she was doing something fraudulent

when official says she was preparing votes to be scanned as was the rest of the people in the room which was what she was suppose to be doing. Wrong conclusion drawn by people looking for anything that will float on the internet.

Then there is a video which right wingers are saying shows a USB being passed to someone which to them indicates guilt and fraud.

Yet the video at best is inconclusive and you cannot see what was in her hand. 2nd explain how a USB could be used to commit fraud by her. Votes are check manually for completeness and validity. The vote is recorded manually. It is then boxed for later scanning into the main voting system. A scanning device is used to scan the votes Votes are counted manually and are scanned and the totals are compared. Any discrepancies has to be accounted for or recounted.

So explain how a USB in this process by a worker to commit fraud? Especially if a USB cannot even be verified that was in her hand.

Finally now the story shifts to something she did 10 years ago. You say she should not have been hired. Does the bible preach forgiveness? or is it more selective based on political rhetoric?

People make mistakes. They still need to make money in legitimate ways. Trump has pardon people who have committed murder but hey they must get on with their lives.

Still this is a country of laws. Innocent until proven guilty. If she committed fraud which is punishable then the court will determine guilt.
:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah:
another stupid paid shill who actually thinks i read their bible length babble of lies.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg: try someone else to get to read you and her propaganda bullshit paid shill. I always follow this advise.:trolls: you defend a proven well known liar here makes you a liar as well.get someone else to feed you troll. i dont play that game of responding to bible length babble that you both posted.
 
You are a moron. You and your ilk IMPEACHED an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE and now you are trying to disavow a video that clearly shows malfeasance. How about the video of the poll worker who ran the SAME stack of ballots TWICE. Go back to your basement.

Which is why it needs to be looked at more intensely, not just see the video and assume what's there.

Ballot counters do more than count, they actually scan the ballot itself just like your home scanner, and stores a photo image of every ballot. Each ballot is numbered, and if the images have duplicate numbers, then it's enough evidence to prove they were scanning a ballot multiple times, and every image needs to be examined.
 
the video shows otherwise,,, you can clearly see them leaving all at once after the person walked around and what seemed to be being telling them to leave,,,

The video shows nothing. The number of votes counted were consistent with the number of people voting. Also election officials were present. You people are garbage.
wrong,,,

It is very right. The number of votes and the number of voters should balance which they did. The fact is that it was investigated by election officials and they examined all of the video footage. They found nothing wrong. You refuse to believe it because you are a brainless fool as well as garbage.
wrong again,,,
 
Nothing in the post above offers ANY proof that fraud did not occur
:thankusmile: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: The dnc is really paying this shill major bucks to lie
Knowing how she engages in lies all the time and never looks at facts I have no doubt you are correct,I’m not about to read through that Bible length babble,I salute you for being able to read through that garbage Bible length babble,don’t know how you do it.

First she was pulling suitcases from under the table and right wingers claimed she was doing something fraudulent

when official says she was preparing votes to be scanned as was the rest of the people in the room which was what she was suppose to be doing. Wrong conclusion drawn by people looking for anything that will float on the internet.

Then there is a video which right wingers are saying shows a USB being passed to someone which to them indicates guilt and fraud.

Yet the video at best is inconclusive and you cannot see what was in her hand. 2nd explain how a USB could be used to commit fraud by her. Votes are check manually for completeness and validity. The vote is recorded manually. It is then boxed for later scanning into the main voting system. A scanning device is used to scan the votes Votes are counted manually and are scanned and the totals are compared. Any discrepancies has to be accounted for or recounted.

So explain how a USB in this process by a worker to commit fraud? Especially if a USB cannot even be verified that was in her hand.

Finally now the story shifts to something she did 10 years ago. You say she should not have been hired. Does the bible preach forgiveness? or is it more selective based on political rhetoric?

People make mistakes. They still need to make money in legitimate ways. Trump has pardon people who have committed murder but hey they must get on with their lives.

Still this is a country of laws. Innocent until proven guilty. If she committed fraud which is punishable then the court will determine guilt.
Your argument is laughable. Now you are calling for due process and less than a year ago you and your ilk impeached an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE. Where was your demand for due process then? HYPOCRITE.
 
Shame for her as it looks like she has had a nice little boutique business.
You're destroying people relying on totally unfounded evidence? Salem ring a bell? Just stoppit. The SoS is investigating this. If he finds she did anything wrong, she'll be arrested. But you've skipped the important step--seeing if she did anything wrong first. Watching an unexplained video of security footage without any explanation of what was going on is not how it's done.
There are none so blind as those who will not see. WATCH THE VIDEO, MYOPIC OLD LADY!
Shouting at me isn't going to do a damned thing for ya, noob. Read Coyote's post 269 which indeed explains that they were doing their jobs. Nothing more.
You are a moron. You and your ilk IMPEACHED an innocent man with NO EVIDENCE and now you are trying to disavow a video that clearly shows malfeasance. How about the video of the poll worker who ran the SAME stack of ballots TWICE. Go back to your basement.
Just what we need right now--yet another fatmouth troll.
And a whiny one at that.
See ya.
 

Forum List

Back
Top