JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
You guys need to get your stories straight across all these fraud claims.From the article:
Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Yeah, because THIS is not suspicious, palming a thumbdrive?
For example, in this one, where you claimed a Dominion technician was "caught" inserting a thumb drive into the computer and "manipulating votes".
*I* did not claim that, I am saying it is obviously suspicious activity and belies the claim that there was none.
The most likely explanation though is it isn't a thumb drive at all. You can't tell what the hell it is. It could be chapstick or a tampon, but you've created an entire conspiracy theory out of something that "looks suspicious" but you have no idea so you are willing to destroy lives without verifying anything.
Yeah, people look all around to make sure no one is watching, palm a chapstick and then slip it in someones pocket while they pretend to not notice all the time. Sure, go with that.
I disagree with you here. It's not just a nickname. People making the claim were implying that they were brought in from somewhere else secretly in suitcases or totes. People really are that dumb.The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers -- not suitcases -- and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present.
'Suitcases' is just a nickname from the people that work at these ballot counting centers, because the containers have an extendable handle like a suitcase. No one truly believes that these are literal suitcases, OMG.
Yeah, and some people believed that Davey Crocket could ride on lightning bolts too, but that does nto prove that any reliable source ever cclaimed it was true.
1. The Fulton County burst pipe occurred at 6am on Tuesday, delaying the start of the absentee ballot counting. This does not correspond to the time table of the supposed "suitcases of fake ballots being counted" when people were supposedly "told to leave".The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said.
Bullshit, they were told to leave due to the burst pipe, and the workers were not supposed to stay and count all night without an observer/minotor from both candidates campaign teams.
Georgia Election Results Delayed After Pipe Bursts in Room with Absentee Ballots | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Georgia – Fulton County’s absentee ballot processing center was flooded after a pipe burst, slowing down the counting of mail-in ballots.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Yes you are correct as to the time frame, but why lie about it and pretend to be fixing it for four hours? They wanted to push the vote into the wee hours of the morning where they could carry on their ballot bullshit.
There are sworn affidavits from two poll watchers that say that they were told to leave. They made these statements under risk of perjury if proven false.2. No one was told to leave.
I'll take THEIR word for what happened.
And at least three persons were present (see Sterling's statement). What's the point here?Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.
At least three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, poll workers, or absentee ballot clerks must be present before commencing; and three persons who are registrars, deputy registrars, or absentee ballot clerks shall be Present at all times while the outer envelopes are being opened. After opening the outer envelopes, the ballots shall be safely and securely stored until the time for tabulating such ballots....
Such committee shall have the right to designate two persons and each independent and nonpartisan candidate whose name appears on the ballot for such election in such county shall have the right to designate one person to act as monitors for such process. ...
Why do you think monitors are required? To make sure everything is valid and not having votes secreted away and brought in for tally that have no chain of custody.
Sorry, but I will believe my own two eyes and what they saw on the video before I believe some lying suit.
No votes were "secreted away" - no votes were "hidden".Why do you think these suitcases of ballots were hidden? How does that NOT break the chain of custody?
Because putting ballots under a table that has a cloth all around it isnt really hiding them?
Everyone fully EXPECTED that Biden's lead would grow because the absentee votes were counted after the in person votes, and in many cases, absentee ballots were not allowed to be even PROCESSED (envelopes removed, signatures verified, etc etc) until after the polls closed. It's no surprise that Biden jumped ahead late, even the Republicans expected it based on how hard they tried to restrict the counting of absentee votes.FIVE STATES all stopped counting in the night, and *POOF* Biden is ahead when they resume, overcoming a Trump lead of thousands of votes, but that is all 'normal' for Democrats? roflmao
And I expected Biden to recover some ground as well, but not in 6 digit spikes that came faster than machines at locations could possible scan physically.
I have little confidence in your ability rate IQ's.I have full confidence that when rational people with an IQ over room temperature sees this video that they will believe their own two eyes, not Democrat lies.
Well there's an easy one, lol.
Seriously, people with book oriented intelligence are fairly gullible and reliant on authority figures to give them what they believe to be Truth and do not process the data for validity and conformity to the world around them. Your acceptance of the GA SoS's word that nothing is ammiss or suspicious in the things revealed on video tape is an example of this.
You accept the word of an unsworn authority figure over what is plainly shown by video that you can see with your own two eye's.
That is not low IQ, it is very high 'Gullibility Quotient'.[/QUOTE]