Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
And she's already been charged with manslaughter.
6 months from now, we'll be reading about the hero's exoneration. Just like we always do.
I don't think always means what you think it means.
Just saw this from a person that lives in the apartment complex. Somebodys lying.
I don't think always means what you think it means.
In the end the contention will be that the victim did this to himself.
Wanna bet? I have a hundred of those 4 cent Federal Reserve Notes to your favorite cause if I'm wrong. I'll cut you a break and you only have to donate 5 of em to mine when I win the bet.
Deal or naw?
Just saw this from a person that lives in the apartment complex. Somebodys lying.
We'll find out more as the evidence comes down the pipe. But neither the use of a grand jury nor the case taking 3 days to come to charges are indications of a 'cover up'.
And I'm still waiting for you to explain the 'big difference' between being charged and indicted.
Just saw this from a person that lives in the apartment complex. Somebodys lying.
We'll find out more as the evidence comes down the pipe. But neither the use of a grand jury nor the case taking 3 days to come to charges are indications of a 'cover up'.
And I'm still waiting for you to explain the 'big difference' between being charged and indicted.
Charges dont mean crap. If you get indicted you stand trial.
Someone is lying. She says the door was ajar. 2 witnesses say they heard knocking on the door and then the officer saying "let me in"
Officer Amber Guyger, 30, was booked into the Kaufman County Jail Sunday evening after Texas Rangers arrested her in connection with the shooting of 26-year-old Botham Jean. She was later released after posting a $300,000 bond.
Just saw this from a person that lives in the apartment complex. Somebodys lying.
We'll find out more as the evidence comes down the pipe. But neither the use of a grand jury nor the case taking 3 days to come to charges are indications of a 'cover up'.
And I'm still waiting for you to explain the 'big difference' between being charged and indicted.
Charges dont mean crap. If you get indicted you stand trial.
What is the distinction you're trying to draw? As charges and indictment are essentially synonyms. You keep offering us these 'ominous' distinctions that aren't really portends of anything.
Like the use of a grand jury......or her being charged within 3 days. These don't indicate anything save perhaps the seriousness of the charges.
Someone is lying. She says the door was ajar. 2 witnesses say they heard knocking on the door and then the officer saying "let me in"
We'll see. The evidence is still coming on on this one. The investigation just started.
Nothing you've cited yet is an indication of a 'cover up'.
Sure. 5 bucks to a charity of the winners choice that the victim isn't found to have shot himself. If the gunshot wound was found to be self inflicted, you win. If the gunshot was not found to be self inflicted, I win.
Nice and neat. She should have been before a judge the next morning after being arrested.Officer Amber Guyger, 30, was booked into the Kaufman County Jail Sunday evening after Texas Rangers arrested her in connection with the shooting of 26-year-old Botham Jean. She was later released after posting a $300,000 bond.
The charges are official. She's been before a judge, she's posted bail and everything.
I disagree. Like I said a charge is nothing. The indictment is what counts.
. You can be charged with anything and not have to stand trial. The fact that they took this long to even charge her for something they would have arrested and charged anyone else with immediately tells me she spent those three days constructing a cover story with the DA's help.
[/QUOTE]I disagree. Like I said a charge is nothing. The indictment is what counts.
You have yet to even describe the distinction. Let alone factually establish anything you've said. She was charged. A warrant was issued. She's been arrested. She's been before a judge. She's had bail set. She's been released on bond.
There are $300,000 reasons why your claims that this is 'nothing' doesn't amount to much.
. You can be charged with anything and not have to stand trial. The fact that they took this long to even charge her for something they would have arrested and charged anyone else with immediately tells me she spent those three days constructing a cover story with the DA's help.
What are you talking about? They charged her with manslaughter.
The shooting occured on a Thursday. She was arrested on a Sunday. What about this indicates a 'cover up'?
You're really reaching so far.
Sure. 5 bucks to a charity of the winners choice that the victim isn't found to have shot himself. If the gunshot wound was found to be self inflicted, you win. If the gunshot was not found to be self inflicted, I win.
When I say that they'll contend that the victim did this to himself, what I mean by that is that they will say he is to blame for incident.
They just did that today. Anyone else would have been immediately arrested and charged. Did they do that to her?[/QUOTE]I disagree. Like I said a charge is nothing. The indictment is what counts.
You have yet to even describe the distinction. Let alone factually establish anything you've said. She was charged. A warrant was issued. She's been arrested. She's been before a judge. She's had bail set. She's been released on bond.
There are $300,000 reasons why your claims that this is 'nothing' doesn't amount to much.
. You can be charged with anything and not have to stand trial. The fact that they took this long to even charge her for something they would have arrested and charged anyone else with immediately tells me she spent those three days constructing a cover story with the DA's help.
What are you talking about? They charged her with manslaughter.
The shooting occured on a Thursday. She was arrested on a Sunday. What about this indicates a 'cover up'?
Y
ou're really reaching so far.
Dallas police arrested officer Amber Guyger on manslaughter charges Sunday, after she shot and killed a man in his apartment last week. Guyger has said she mistakenly believed she had entered her own home in the same building.
Manslaughter Charge For Dallas Police Officer Who Killed A Man In His Own Apartment
They just did that today. Anyone else would have been immediately arrested and charged. Did they do that to her?I disagree. Like I said a charge is nothing. The indictment is what counts.
You have yet to even describe the distinction. Let alone factually establish anything you've said. She was charged. A warrant was issued. She's been arrested. She's been before a judge. She's had bail set. She's been released on bond.
There are $300,000 reasons why your claims that this is 'nothing' doesn't amount to much.
. You can be charged with anything and not have to stand trial. The fact that they took this long to even charge her for something they would have arrested and charged anyone else with immediately tells me she spent those three days constructing a cover story with the DA's help.
What are you talking about? They charged her with manslaughter.
The shooting occured on a Thursday. She was arrested on a Sunday. What about this indicates a 'cover up'?
Y
ou're really reaching so far.
Dallas police arrested officer Amber Guyger on manslaughter charges Sunday, after she shot and killed a man in his apartment last week. Guyger has said she mistakenly believed she had entered her own home in the same building.
Manslaughter Charge For Dallas Police Officer Who Killed A Man In His Own Apartment
The shooting happened on thursday.
It wasnt an officer involved shooting. She was off duty and no one told her there was a crime in progress.
The shooting happened on thursday.They just did that today. Anyone else would have been immediately arrested and charged. Did they do that to her?I disagree. Like I said a charge is nothing. The indictment is what counts.
You have yet to even describe the distinction. Let alone factually establish anything you've said. She was charged. A warrant was issued. She's been arrested. She's been before a judge. She's had bail set. She's been released on bond.
There are $300,000 reasons why your claims that this is 'nothing' doesn't amount to much.
. You can be charged with anything and not have to stand trial. The fact that they took this long to even charge her for something they would have arrested and charged anyone else with immediately tells me she spent those three days constructing a cover story with the DA's help.
What are you talking about? They charged her with manslaughter.
The shooting occured on a Thursday. She was arrested on a Sunday. What about this indicates a 'cover up'?
Y
ou're really reaching so far.
She was arrested on Sunday.
Dallas police arrested officer Amber Guyger on manslaughter charges Sunday, after she shot and killed a man in his apartment last week. Guyger has said she mistakenly believed she had entered her own home in the same building.
Manslaughter Charge For Dallas Police Officer Who Killed A Man In His Own Apartment
An officer involved shooting that resulted in criminal charges being turned around in 72 hours? That's lighting fast and zero indication of a cover up.
Just as the use of a grand jury doesn't indicate a cover up.
It wasnt an officer involved shooting. She was off duty and no one told her there was a crime in progress.
No. What makes it an officer involved shooting is if she is doing her duty as an officer. This was personal. Even the police are saying its not an officer involved shooting.
