Asclepias
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2013
- 114,820
- 18,670
I already posted where the cops said it was not an officer involved shooting. Why are you even disputing this? This came from the link you gave me.No. What makes it an officer involved shooting is if she is doing her duty as an officer. This was personal. Even the police are saying its not an officer involved shooting.
No, what makes it an officer involved shooting is it involving an officer. They don't call the Texas Rangers for every shooting that happens in Dallas. Nor do we discuss it.
The use of an indepedant law enforcement agency is *counter* indicative of a cover up. As the Dallas police department is removed from the investigative equation. The use of grand jury doesn't indicate a cover up, as virtually every charge against every officer involves one. And they are almost always secret.
And 72 hours for an officer involved shooting is lightly fast. Also, not an indication of a cover up.
Do you have anything to back the cover up narrative? Anything at all?
"Police initially treated the incident as an "officer-involved shooting."
"However," Hall said, "as we continued this investigation it became clear that we were dealing with what appears to be a much different and very unique situation."
I already told you why I think there is going to be a cover up. Grand jury transcripts are secret and they took 3 days to charge her.