Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.
Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.
{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).
The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.
“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.
Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}
The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show
You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.
Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.
You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?
DERP
Same lies from the same retards...
{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.
Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.
So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.
If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.
What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.
Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.
Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}
The Gun Show Loophole Myth
[
There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.
False, you ignorant Maoist.
Fascism is a system devised by Benito Mussolini, head of the Italian Bolshevik party to "fix" the flaws of Marxism. The primary "flaw" being of course that Vladimir Lenin, rather than he was the ruler of the movement.
Mussolini detailed his system in "Il Fascisti" which you can read here Benito Mussolini (Author of The Doctrine of Fascism)
Perhaps the most poignant quote being "why should the state need to own the means of production when the state owns the owners?"
Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.
So Wiemar Germany under Hitler, Spain under Franco; Japan under ToJo, or in Chile, Austria, Croatia, Finland, France under Petain, Greece, Norway, Hungry, Portugal, Romania and Yugoslavia are were not fascist countries?
A study of these forms of fascism have an number of commonalities, but also vary from that of Mussolini in Italy and the Nazi Movement in Germany.
For those interested in history, a study of how these nations devolved into fascist nations can be enlightening, for those who don't have the time or energy or willingness, all they need to do is to watch and listen to Trump, and his fellow travelers.
progressive fascism of shutting down opponents is anything but new
Do you ever think before you post? This thread alone is an example of someone from the Alt. Right, aka, the neo fascist movement attacking a 17 year old.
They are just acknowledging it is not worth the headacheLaura ruined her own damn career. Laura and the rest of the right have been attacking these victims since day one.
They lack the tact and sense when talking about these kids. You criticize their stance but you also have to be a little sensitive to the fact they've gone through a traumatic experience and they are still very young.
Laura making fun of David because he got rejected from university is just plain tasteless and nasty.
So advertisers and the people have right to not want to be associated with such human vermin.
Yea, we have to ban everyone that doesn't parrot liberal ideology. There can only be one view expressed!
I try to stop doing business with companies that pull support for political reasons.
Moron, that was just one of the several definitions my link offered. That doesn’t negate the one I used.I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?
Who knew?
Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
: spoken rather than written
- a verbal contract
Fucking retard.
But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.
Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
And I took the link YOU posted, retard.
Verbal, spoken.
What fool you are.
Now there’s two questions you’re refusing to answer...
1) How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
2) Exactly how senile are ya, gramps?
Many of them are voting in November....and I stack their education against moronic trumpanzees any day of the week.These uneducated "students" will b voting in a couple years. Yes, uneducated voters are something to be feared -- except by the far left. They need them to advance their tyrannical agenda.So shrill...so frightened...of HS students..
Moron, from the link you just provided. The very first definition...Moron, that was just one of the several definitions my link offered. That doesn’t negate the one I used.I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.
Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
: spoken rather than written
- a verbal contract
Fucking retard.
But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.
Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
And I took the link YOU posted, retard.
Verbal, spoken.
What fool you are.
Now there’s two questions you’re refusing to answer...
1) How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
2) Exactly how senile are ya, gramps?
What a fucking retard.
{
ver′bal•ly, adv.
usage.: verbal has had the meaning “spoken” since the late 16th century and is thus synonymous with oral: I wrote amemorandum to confirm the verbal agreement. This use is sometimes criticized for being etymologically incorrect orambiguous, though the context usu. makes the meaning clear: No documents are necessary; a verbal order willsuffice. oral can always be used if the context demands: My lawyer insists on a written contract because oralagreements are too difficult to enforce.}
From your own link - dickwad
^ trumpanzees frightened of a HS student.
Wait until voters see the FY2018 federal deficit.Many of them are voting in November....and I stack their education against moronic trumpanzees any day of the week.These uneducated "students" will b voting in a couple years. Yes, uneducated voters are something to be feared -- except by the far left. They need them to advance their tyrannical agenda.So shrill...so frightened...of HS students..
how's that working out....for the companies? Are they devastated?Laura ruined her own damn career. Laura and the rest of the right have been attacking these victims since day one.
They lack the tact and sense when talking about these kids. You criticize their stance but you also have to be a little sensitive to the fact they've gone through a traumatic experience and they are still very young.
Laura making fun of David because he got rejected from university is just plain tasteless and nasty.
So advertisers and the people have right to not want to be associated with such human vermin.
Yea, we have to ban everyone that doesn't parrot liberal ideology. There can only be one view expressed!
I try to stop doing business with companies that pull support for political reasons.
Don't you know? The RW trumpanzees are ALWAYS the victims. ALWAYS.I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?View attachment 185603
For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17-year-old being rejected by several colleges.
David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent
Well we do keep saying the Trump haters are idiots and no matter how much you try to warn them , inform them they laugh, they call it all a conspiracy , or their Obama / Clinton favorite training to use " It's fake" .. to this day they can't realize why those two made it a point to make that mention during Trump's run as they tried to sink Trump with lie after lie after lie.
But in the end you can't fix stupid and you all are eating yourselves alive lmfao. And so is this idiot who thinks he is going to start a revolution.
Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?
Who knew?
Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.[
There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.
how's that working out....for the companies? Are they devastated?Laura ruined her own damn career. Laura and the rest of the right have been attacking these victims since day one.
They lack the tact and sense when talking about these kids. You criticize their stance but you also have to be a little sensitive to the fact they've gone through a traumatic experience and they are still very young.
Laura making fun of David because he got rejected from university is just plain tasteless and nasty.
So advertisers and the people have right to not want to be associated with such human vermin.
Yea, we have to ban everyone that doesn't parrot liberal ideology. There can only be one view expressed!
I try to stop doing business with companies that pull support for political reasons.
how's that working out....for the companies? Are they devastated?Laura ruined her own damn career. Laura and the rest of the right have been attacking these victims since day one.
They lack the tact and sense when talking about these kids. You criticize their stance but you also have to be a little sensitive to the fact they've gone through a traumatic experience and they are still very young.
Laura making fun of David because he got rejected from university is just plain tasteless and nasty.
So advertisers and the people have right to not want to be associated with such human vermin.
Yea, we have to ban everyone that doesn't parrot liberal ideology. There can only be one view expressed!
I try to stop doing business with companies that pull support for political reasons.
The kind of mental health issues that should be checked out......before any gun purchase.For the record, the self identified conservatives, Alt. Right/neo fascist set, are both hypocrites and bigots who are intolerant of any idea or speech which conflicts with their narrow and regressive beliefs.
If a Rosa Parks today refused to give up her seat today to a white man, the same )*&%$#%'s who are attacking this young man would attack her.
Laura Ingram is an example of the continued efforts to divide our nation, and this is the most egregious from of sedition; it's fellow travelers above ought to think before they post hate we see in pages above.
Says the hate filled racist democrat.
There is NO hypocrisy like demopocrisy...
Your constant posts of this ^^^ mental masturbation genre continue unrequited, and deservedly so.
So Comrade, where is the hate?
{
Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead. Once you get that, everything that is happening now will make sense. And you will understand what you need to be ready to do.
You are normal, and therefore a heretic. You refuse to bow to their idols, to subscribe to their twisted catechisms, to praise their false gods. This is unforgivable. You must burn.
Crazy talk? Just ask them. Go ahead. Go on social media. Find a leftist – it’s easy. Just say something positive about America or Jesus and they’ll come swarming like locusts. Engage them and very quickly they will drop their masks and tell you what they really think. I know. I keep a rapidly expanding file of Twitter leftist death wish screenshots.
They will tell you that Christians are idiots and vets are scum.
That normals are subhumans whose role is to labor as serfs to subsidize the progressive elite and its clients.
That you should die to make way for the New Progressive Man/Woman/Other.
Understand that when they call Donald Trump “illegitimate,” what they are really saying is that our desire to govern ourselves is illegitimate. Their beef isn’t with him – it’s with us, the normal people who dared rise up and demand their right to participate in the rule of this country and this culture.
They hate you, because by defying them you have prevented them from living up to the dictates of their false religion. Our rebelliousness has denied them the state of grace they seek, exercising their divine right to dictate every aspect of our puny lives. Their sick faith gives meaning to these secular weirdos, giving them something that fills their empty lives with a messianic fervor to go out and conquer and convert the heathens.
And the heathens are us.}
Kurt Schlichter - The Left Hates You. Act Accordingly.
You racist fucks are overflowing with hatred.
The more you post, the more your sanity comes into question. Get help before you do something stupid.
Why are people listening to him and still ignoring you?View attachment 185603
For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17-year-old being rejected by several colleges.
David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent
Well we do keep saying the Trump haters are idiots and no matter how much you try to warn them , inform them they laugh, they call it all a conspiracy , or their Obama / Clinton favorite training to use " It's fake" .. to this day they can't realize why those two made it a point to make that mention during Trump's run as they tried to sink Trump with lie after lie after lie.
But in the end you can't fix stupid and you all are eating yourselves alive lmfao. And so is this idiot who thinks he is going to start a revolution.
the kid looks mentally ill without question
Nah, he just looks like he is in the throws of puberty. He's part of the "Tide Pod Challenge" generation.
The more you post, the more your sanity comes into question. Get help before you do something stupid.
No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.
{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).
The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.
“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.
Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}
The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show
You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.
Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.
You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?
DERP
Same lies from the same retards...
{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.
Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.
So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.
If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.
What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.
Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.
Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}
The Gun Show Loophole Myth
Stop lying, ya loopy old fart. You already admitted there’s a loophole, even if you refuse to believe what you post...
However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.
Moron, from the link you just provided. The very first definition...Moron, that was just one of the several definitions my link offered. That doesn’t negate the one I used.I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.
: spoken rather than written
- a verbal contract
Fucking retard.
But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.
Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?
How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
And I took the link YOU posted, retard.
Verbal, spoken.
What fool you are.
Now there’s two questions you’re refusing to answer...
1) How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?
2) Exactly how senile are ya, gramps?
What a fucking retard.
{
ver′bal•ly, adv.
usage.: verbal has had the meaning “spoken” since the late 16th century and is thus synonymous with oral: I wrote amemorandum to confirm the verbal agreement. This use is sometimes criticized for being etymologically incorrect orambiguous, though the context usu. makes the meaning clear: No documents are necessary; a verbal order willsuffice. oral can always be used if the context demands: My lawyer insists on a written contract because oralagreements are too difficult to enforce.}
From your own link - dickwad
1. Of, relating to, or associated with words
Keep on attacking the survivors of a school shooting...the material for election campaigns alone is awesome.
Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.[
There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.
Well, I'd say that's the most appealing aspect of Fascism, being that it would manage the Corporations, and their value as within the state interest, so they wouldn't continue hiring illegal immigrants in mass, or outsourcing jobs in mass, to cut the American workers throats in the name of "Cheap Labor".
