David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent

[Uncensored2008]

[

There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.

False, you ignorant Maoist.

Fascism is a system devised by Benito Mussolini, head of the Italian Bolshevik party to "fix" the flaws of Marxism. The primary "flaw" being of course that Vladimir Lenin, rather than he was the ruler of the movement.

Mussolini detailed his system in "Il Fascisti" which you can read here Benito Mussolini (Author of The Doctrine of Fascism)

Perhaps the most poignant quote being "why should the state need to own the means of production when the state owns the owners?"


Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.

 

[Camp]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.

Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.

{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).

The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.

“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.

Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}

The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show

You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.

No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[]
Given this articulation or a silly meme, what would a smart person choose?

That is a question you Stalinists will never know the answer to....

 

[Faun]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.

Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.

{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).

The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.

“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.

Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}

The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show

You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.

Why do you lie like that? Of course there’s a loophole. Even you should know it because you just posted it. YOU just said....

”If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.“​

And among other places, unlicensed dealers also sell guns at gun shows. If you want to play semantics, sure, it’s really an unlicensed dealer loophole; but whatever you want to call it, that’s the loophole which needs to be closed. Even when purchasing a firearm from an unlicensed individual, a background check should be mandatory. With stiff penalties to anyone selling a firearm to someone who fails a background check.

 

[jillian]

Perfect display of brawn over brains...

Hogg's SAT score was just average....not too brainy

Well we can't expect everyone to be as smert as we were....

Not him anyway....he's bawling about getting rejected from colleges, that's why.

He was accepted to Cal Poly, Florida Atlantic and Cal State, so I don't think he's that worried.

The California Polytechnic Universities don't have an "acceptance" criterion per se. If you are a California resident, a high school graduate, and you pass the entrance exam you get in. I'm an alumni of Cal Poly Pomona from my undergrad program.

Admission to Cal Poly is competitive in all majors. Cal Poly continues to have more qualified applicants than available new student spaces. All students must declare a major when submitting their application. Cal Poly comprehensively reviews all applications as we look for students who have strong academic records and are active in and outside the classroom. Beyond the basic qualifications for the California State University, Cal Poly considers other factors for admission deemed important to the campus and does so in an objective format. In fact, it is impossible to predict a candidate's chances of admission by looking at the academic record alone. All candidates are objectively evaluated by the cognitive and non-cognitive variables under the faculty-mandated Multi-Criteria Admission (MCA) process. When we review your application, we consider:

• Your intended program of study (the major to which the application is made)
• Your college-preparatory courses in secondary school
• GPA earned in college-preparatory courses
• Standardized test scores
• Your extra-curricular activities and work experience

Applicants Freshman Selection Criteria Admissions - Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo

 

[Uncensored2008]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

What about the private sales loophole?

A myth of the anti-civil rights crowd.

No, i don't want a father leaving a gun to his son to have to conduct a background check.

Why not?
He cannot just hand over a car. You have to sign over the paperwork

You just want a backdoor to sell guns to criminals without checks

Same old lies from the same old Communists. We have defeated you repeatedly on this, shitflinger.

MILLER: The gun-show loophole myth

 

[Uncensored2008]

View attachment 185603

For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17-year-old being rejected by several colleges.



David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent


Well we do keep saying the Trump haters are idiots and no matter how much you try to warn them , inform them they laugh, they call it all a conspiracy , or their Obama / Clinton favorite training to use " It's fake" .. to this day they can't realize why those two made it a point to make that mention during Trump's run as they tried to sink Trump with lie after lie after lie.

But in the end you can't fix stupid and you all are eating yourselves alive lmfao. And so is this idiot who thinks he is going to start a revolution.

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?

Who knew?

I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.

verbal

of, relating to, or consisting of words​

Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

: spoken rather than written

• a verbal contract

Fucking retard.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.

Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.

{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).

The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.

“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.

Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}

The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show

You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.

No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.

Again, you anti-civil rights clowns trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.

 

[Faun]

View attachment 185603

For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17-year-old being rejected by several colleges.



David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent


Well we do keep saying the Trump haters are idiots and no matter how much you try to warn them , inform them they laugh, they call it all a conspiracy , or their Obama / Clinton favorite training to use " It's fake" .. to this day they can't realize why those two made it a point to make that mention during Trump's run as they tried to sink Trump with lie after lie after lie.

But in the end you can't fix stupid and you all are eating yourselves alive lmfao. And so is this idiot who thinks he is going to start a revolution.

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?

Who knew?

I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.

verbal

of, relating to, or consisting of words​

Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

: spoken rather than written

• a verbal contract

Fucking retard.

I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.

But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.

Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

 

[Camp]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

What about the private sales loophole?

A myth of the anti-civil rights crowd.

No, i don't want a father leaving a gun to his son to have to conduct a background check.

Why not?
He cannot just hand over a car. You have to sign over the paperwork

You just want a backdoor to sell guns to criminals without checks

Same old lies from the same old Communists. We have defeated you repeatedly on this, shitflinger.

MILLER: The gun-show loophole myth

Only 6 states require background checks on all sales in gun shows. You are a horrible failure as a liar.

 

[Faun]

Then close the gun show loophole and call for thorough universal background checks.

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.

Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.

{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).

The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.

“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.

Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}

The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show

You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.

No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.

Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.

You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?

 

[Wry Catcher]

For the record, the self identified conservatives, Alt. Right/neo fascist set, are both hypocrites and bigots who are intolerant of any idea or speech which conflicts with their narrow and regressive beliefs.

If a Rosa Parks today refused to give up her seat today to a white man, the same )*&%$#%'s who are attacking this young man would attack her.

Laura Ingram is an example of the continued efforts to divide our nation, and this is the most egregious from of sedition; it's fellow travelers above ought to think before they post hate we see in pages above.

Says the hate filled racist democrat.

There is NO hypocrisy like demopocrisy...

Your constant posts of this ^^^ mental masturbation genre continue unrequited, and deservedly so.

 

[Uncensored2008]

View attachment 185603

For Laura Ingraham, there was no choice but to apologize to Parkland school shooting activist David Hogg for her foolish tweet regarding the 17-year-old being rejected by several colleges.



David Hogg's attempt to end Laura Ingraham's career sets dangerous precedent


Well we do keep saying the Trump haters are idiots and no matter how much you try to warn them , inform them they laugh, they call it all a conspiracy , or their Obama / Clinton favorite training to use " It's fake" .. to this day they can't realize why those two made it a point to make that mention during Trump's run as they tried to sink Trump with lie after lie after lie.

But in the end you can't fix stupid and you all are eating yourselves alive lmfao. And so is this idiot who thinks he is going to start a revolution.

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?

Who knew?

I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.

verbal

of, relating to, or consisting of words​

Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

: spoken rather than written

• a verbal contract

Fucking retard.

I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.

But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.

Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

And I took the link YOU posted, retard.

Verbal, spoken.

What fool you are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

What about the private sales loophole?

A myth of the anti-civil rights crowd.

No, i don't want a father leaving a gun to his son to have to conduct a background check.

Why not?
He cannot just hand over a car. You have to sign over the paperwork

You just want a backdoor to sell guns to criminals without checks

Same old lies from the same old Communists. We have defeated you repeatedly on this, shitflinger.

MILLER: The gun-show loophole myth

Only 6 states require background checks on all sales in gun shows. You are a horrible failure as a liar.

Your straw man argument has nothing to do with claims I have made.

 

[Wry Catcher]

[

There is no singular definition of fascism, other than it has used the machinations of divide and conquer over a population to gain power, is authoritarian in nature, and its leaders narrowly defines patriotism by attacking those who are different in creed, color or ethnicity. In this case, students who have questioned gun policies.

False, you ignorant Maoist.

Fascism is a system devised by Benito Mussolini, head of the Italian Bolshevik party to "fix" the flaws of Marxism. The primary "flaw" being of course that Vladimir Lenin, rather than he was the ruler of the movement.

Mussolini detailed his system in "Il Fascisti" which you can read here Benito Mussolini (Author of The Doctrine of Fascism)

Perhaps the most poignant quote being "why should the state need to own the means of production when the state owns the owners?"


Mussolini devised a system where all things, including the people, belong to the state. Sounds an awful lot like what you Stalinist democrats promote.

So Wiemar Germany under Hitler, Spain under Franco; Japan under ToJo, or in Chile, Austria, Croatia, Finland, France under Petain, Greece, Norway, Hungry, Portugal, Romania and Yugoslavia are were not fascist countries?

A study of these forms of fascism have an number of commonalities, but also vary from that of Mussolini in Italy and the Nazi Movement in Germany.

For those interested in history, a study of how these nations devolved into fascist nations can be enlightening, for those who don't have the time or energy or willingness, all they need to do is to watch and listen to Trump, and his fellow travelers.

 

[Faun]

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

Tweets are "verbal," Li'l Kim?

Who knew?

I knew. Now even a desperate, senile loser like you knows.

verbal

of, relating to, or consisting of words​

Education time is over. Now about my question. Why don’t you try to answer it instead of trolling?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

: spoken rather than written

• a verbal contract

Fucking retard.

I just gave you a definition of the word, “verbal,” and you still didn’t learn? That’s on you.

But being the kind hearted Liberal I am, I’ll give you another clue.... like many words, the word, “verbal,” has more than one definition. Meaning both yours and mine are valid.

Now then, are ya going to keep trolling or are you going to answer a question that’s relevant to the thread?

How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

And I took the link YOU posted, retard.

Verbal, spoken.

What fool you are.

Moron, that was just one of the several definitions my link offered. That doesn’t negate the one I used.

Now there’s two questions you’re refusing to answer...

1) How the fuck did David Hogg set out to end Laura Ingraham’s career? By making her verbally attack him?

2) Exactly how senile are ya, gramps?

 

[Uncensored2008]

There is no gun show loophole, that is just a lie you Marxists tell to each other.

Uncensored is telling a whopper of a lie. Easy to confirm lie.

Someone is sure trying to lie, Comrade.

{
Ah, the “gun show loophole”. Your liberal friends have probably mentioned it when trying to convince you that there must be “common sense gun safety legislation” (or some similar liberal terminology).

The erroneous premise is that criminals buy guns to use in crimes at gun shows because gun show purchases don’t require the same background checks as purchases made at firearms retail establishments. This, of course, has been debunked many times but that doesn’t stop liberals from using it as an argument because reality doesn’t matter when a good false narrative will do. Unless guns are purchased from a private individual a background check is required by law. If you, or anyone else, purchases a gun from a licensed dealer at a gun show there will be a background check performed to determine if you can legally purchase a firearm. However, when purchasing from an individual rather than a business, that doesn’t apply because such private transactions aren’t regulated by the government.

“Ah HA!!”, you might say, “THAT”s where all those illegally trafficked guns are bought and sold!” Uh… no. Research shows that only a tiny percentage – less than one percent – of firearms offenders have acquired guns through gun show purchases. So, the old “gun show loophole” is a myth. It’s an often repeated myth, but a myth nonetheless.

Where do criminals get their guns, then? Research shows that criminals steal guns or buy them from other criminals who either steal them or break laws to acquire them, such as making “straw purchases” from legal dealers. One such instance happened in Ohio recently when a man made a straw purchase of two dozen handguns from four different dealers, claiming that he needed them for his job teaching a concealed carry class, and then passed them along to criminals who couldn’t pass background checks. [more]}

The Myth of the “Gun Show Loophole” – The Mark & Mack Show

You've had your ass kicked on this bullshit several dozen times.

No, liar. You gloss over the narrative in your post that admits firearms are purchased at gun shows from private dealers without background checks.
You are delusional abour kicking anyones ass.

Again, you anti-civil rights clows trot out the same tired bullshit over and over. You get the shit kicked out of you, then whimper away.

You just fucking said anyone can buy a firearm at a gun show and not be subjected to a background screening by an unlicensed dealer. That’s what you call, kicking our ass. Exactly how senile are you, gramps?

DERP

Same lies from the same retards...

{
The “Gun Show Loophole” demagoguery demonizes these individual collectors and portrays them as the source of all of our troubles. What the gun control lobby wants to confuse the public into supporting is the enactment of laws that require background checks on private sales, transfers or loans of firearms.

Certainly, some individuals do come to gun shows to barter, trade, sell or buy firearms – but they are not dealers any more than those who meet at a gun range and choose to trade. If they were dealers, the ATF would force them to register as federal firearms licensees under existing law. And yes, ATF agents come to every gun show, and even flea markets and other such venues, looking for violations of these laws.

So what is the real purpose of the push to close the “gun show loophole”? Since there is no loophole, the purpose is to convince the public to agree to a law that subject ALL private sales, transfers, or loans of firearms to the background check requirement.

If such a law were in place, you could not loan a firearm to a friend for a weekend hunt, trade guns at the range or give your son a deer rifle without going to a federal firearm licensed dealer to conduct a background check. This extension of government into the private lives of gun owners is meant to cause inconvenience and thereby discourage the ownership of firearms. It will especially discourage the gifting and loaning of firearms so often used to encourage someone to join the shooting community.

What this will not do is slow down the acquisition of firearms by criminals. It is already illegal for even a private individual to transfer a firearm to a felon or other prohibited person.

Many people are unaware that studies show virtually all criminals obtain their firearms through black market transactions on the street. Just as gang members deal in drugs and other contraband, they trade and sell firearms, many of which have been stolen in the first place. These dealers in contraband care nothing about laws and will never conduct background checks. Thus these laws only burden the law abiding citizens with the proposed incursions on their Second Amendment rights.

Mass shootings and the Charleston tragedy are no exception. In a public statement the FBI Director admitted that it was a bureaucratic error that permitted the Charleston shooter to obtain a firearm. Improving the existing system under current law may have helped – but no new intrusions on State and Federal Constitutional rights are necessary. As for other mass shootings occurring across our country, the perpetrators commonly pass background checks when they buy firearms through licensed dealers, and we find many more instances where theft, rather than a private sale, is the source of firearms.}


The Gun Show Loophole Myth

 

[Uncensored2008]

For the record, the self identified conservatives, Alt. Right/neo fascist set, are both hypocrites and bigots who are intolerant of any idea or speech which conflicts with their narrow and regressive beliefs.

If a Rosa Parks today refused to give up her seat today to a white man, the same )*&%$#%'s who are attacking this young man would attack her.

Laura Ingram is an example of the continued efforts to divide our nation, and this is the most egregious from of sedition; it's fellow travelers above ought to think before they post hate we see in pages above.

Says the hate filled racist democrat.

There is NO hypocrisy like demopocrisy...

Your constant posts of this ^^^ mental masturbation genre continue unrequited, and deservedly so.

So Comrade, where is the hate?

{
Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead. Once you get that, everything that is happening now will make sense. And you will understand what you need to be ready to do.

You are normal, and therefore a heretic. You refuse to bow to their idols, to subscribe to their twisted catechisms, to praise their false gods. This is unforgivable. You must burn.

Crazy talk? Just ask them. Go ahead. Go on social media. Find a leftist – it’s easy. Just say something positive about America or Jesus and they’ll come swarming like locusts. Engage them and very quickly they will drop their masks and tell you what they really think. I know. I keep a rapidly expanding file of Twitter leftist death wish screenshots.

They will tell you that Christians are idiots and vets are scum.

That normals are subhumans whose role is to labor as serfs to subsidize the progressive elite and its clients.

That you should die to make way for the New Progressive Man/Woman/Other.

Understand that when they call Donald Trump “illegitimate,” what they are really saying is that our desire to govern ourselves is illegitimate. Their beef isn’t with him – it’s with us, the normal people who dared rise up and demand their right to participate in the rule of this country and this culture.

They hate you, because by defying them you have prevented them from living up to the dictates of their false religion. Our rebelliousness has denied them the state of grace they seek, exercising their divine right to dictate every aspect of our puny lives. Their sick faith gives meaning to these secular weirdos, giving them something that fills their empty lives with a messianic fervor to go out and conquer and convert the heathens.

And the heathens are us.}

Kurt Schlichter - The Left Hates You. Act Accordingly.


You racist fucks are overflowing with hatred.

 

[Wry Catcher]

For the record, the self identified conservatives, Alt. Right/neo fascist set, are both hypocrites and bigots who are intolerant of any idea or speech which conflicts with their narrow and regressive beliefs.

If a Rosa Parks today refused to give up her seat today to a white man, the same )*&%$#%'s who are attacking this young man would attack her.

Laura Ingram is an example of the continued efforts to divide our nation, and this is the most egregious from of sedition; it's fellow travelers above ought to think before they post hate we see in pages above.

Says the hate filled racist democrat.

There is NO hypocrisy like demopocrisy...

Your constant posts of this ^^^ mental masturbation genre continue unrequited, and deservedly so.

So Comrade, where is the hate?

{
Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead. Once you get that, everything that is happening now will make sense. And you will understand what you need to be ready to do.

You are normal, and therefore a heretic. You refuse to bow to their idols, to subscribe to their twisted catechisms, to praise their false gods. This is unforgivable. You must burn.

Crazy talk? Just ask them. Go ahead. Go on social media. Find a leftist – it’s easy. Just say something positive about America or Jesus and they’ll come swarming like locusts. Engage them and very quickly they will drop their masks and tell you what they really think. I know. I keep a rapidly expanding file of Twitter leftist death wish screenshots.

They will tell you that Christians are idiots and vets are scum.

That normals are subhumans whose role is to labor as serfs to subsidize the progressive elite and its clients.

That you should die to make way for the New Progressive Man/Woman/Other.

Understand that when they call Donald Trump “illegitimate,” what they are really saying is that our desire to govern ourselves is illegitimate. Their beef isn’t with him – it’s with us, the normal people who dared rise up and demand their right to participate in the rule of this country and this culture.

They hate you, because by defying them you have prevented them from living up to the dictates of their false religion. Our rebelliousness has denied them the state of grace they seek, exercising their divine right to dictate every aspect of our puny lives. Their sick faith gives meaning to these secular weirdos, giving them something that fills their empty lives with a messianic fervor to go out and conquer and convert the heathens.

And the heathens are us.}

Kurt Schlichter - The Left Hates You. Act Accordingly.


You racist fucks are overflowing with hatred.

The more you post, the more your sanity comes into question. Get help before you do something stupid.

 

[Carl in Michigan]