Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Presidential immunity didn’t exist until Trump needed it to. Here we go! 6 conservative Supreme Court justices swoop in to make sure he can do whatever the fuck he wants without repercussions.
There’s only one kind of president that feels the need to have immunity and that’s someone intent on breaking the law. Again.
No one thought it existed before Trump. Hell, even Trumps own lawyers didn’t think it existed when he was being impeached. Know why? It’s not in the constitution. They made it up.It always existed, it just wasn't questioned until Dems JUST HAD TO GET TRUMP over bullshit.
So FDR could have been charged for Pearl Harbor? Obama for allowing Russia to get the Crimea in 2014? Carter for allowing the Hostages to be taken in 1979?
None of those Presidents had ANY immunity? Zero? None?
All Presidents have had immunity for official acts, Moroner.Presidential immunity didn’t exist until Trump needed it to. Here we go! 6 conservative Supreme Court justices swoop in to make sure he can do whatever the fuck he wants without repercussions.
There’s only one kind of president that feels the need to have immunity and that’s someone intent on breaking the law. Again.
No one thought it existed before Trump. Hell, even Trumps own lawyers didn’t think it existed when he was being impeached. Know why? It’s not in the constitution. They made it up.
WTF are you talking about? How are any of your examples a criminal act by the president? This is gibberish.
Who said it existed before now?BULL FUCKING SHIT.
It existed, it was just never questioned. The Court had to answer the question.
That you can't understand the examples just shows how fucking retarded you are.
www.msnbc.com
The only reason there was a trial at all is that NJ has Dem Governor who can appoint a D replacement if need be. If NJ had a GOP Gov there most likely would not have been a trial at all.No surprise. He faces a lot of jail time, but do you think he'll actually serve any time?
Who said it existed before now?
Mitch McConnell sure as hell never thought it existed when he voted to acquit Trump in 2021.
Why McConnell’s 2021 speech about Trump is suddenly relevant anew
The speech Mitch McConnell delivered after Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial was important at the time. It’s even more important now.
Your examples are idiotic. The president does not violate a law when a foreign country commits an act. You really are a bad debater.
Fucking up isn’t against the law, dipshit.Impeachment is the actual process for removing a President from office for illegal acts. Anything else is unconstitutional.
My examples are of a President performing their presidential duties, and fucking up. Should they have been prosecuted for it?
Trump also didn't get complete immunity, as you keep ignoring.
I've beaten you silly in every thread you have been in with me.
Fucking up isn’t against the law, dipshit.
You dodged where McConnell said Trump was subject to criminal prosecution. You’re gaslighting when you say presidential immunity was unquestioned. It wasn’t. Presidents being subject to criminal law was unquestioned.
McConnell voted to acquit him you dipshit!Once he is impeached, and for actual criminal acts. Not some hissy fit bullshit lawfare crap.
So you think Dimocrats set him up, arrested him, tried him, and found him guilty?
Dem / Socialists don't police their own. It was Republicans who decided that Biden and his crime family Syndicate be held accountable. Dems / Socialists allowed Hunter Biden to skate past his gun charges. Are Dems / Socialists policing Biden and his illegal open borders disaster?
You see, the Dems police their own. Why can't Republicans do that?
