Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LolI would be advocating protecting our rights by ensuring guns are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens.Assume that gun laws actually have an effect on homicide rates (and not some other factor). You would be advocating the sacrifice of liberty for security, right?It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
.
If we keep doing things your way, it is just a matter of time before the death toll rises so high that America will repeal the second amendment..
You do realize more people are killed by people using knives, hammers, bathtubs, lawnmowers, swimming pools than firearms?
Political correctness makes people fucking retarded
See? I said that all you can do in the face of the facts is whine, cuss and lie.
You just lied.
There were 17,284 murders in 2017. 14,542 of those homicides were by guns.
I'm done wasting my time with you. Being a gun lobby parroting rube makes people fucking retarded.
If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
An assault weapon ban by itself would accomplish little. The 12,000+ gun homicides each year are mostly murder by handgun.No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
Just like the opioid manufacturers, the gun makers of America have flooded the market with more guns than are wanted or needed by legitimate gun owners. They both know they are responsible for the mass deaths which have been happening for far too long.
"I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." - Donald Trump, The America We Deserve
MAGA!
The number of law abiding citizens buying guns is not 320 million. In fact, a much, much smaller percentage of Americans own guns than before. Less law abiding citizens are demanding guns.If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
Moron....if law abiding people aren't buying guns, then criminals will be the only ones buying them, and demand will drop......criminals are not 320 million people.
An assault weapon ban by itself would accomplish little. The 12,000+ gun homicides each year are mostly murder by handgun.No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
Just like the opioid manufacturers, the gun makers of America have flooded the market with more guns than are wanted or needed by legitimate gun owners. They both know they are responsible for the mass deaths which have been happening for far too long.
"I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." - Donald Trump, The America We Deserve
MAGA!
The number of law abiding citizens buying guns is not 320 million. In fact, a much, much smaller percentage of Americans own guns than before. Less law abiding citizens are demanding guns.If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
Moron....if law abiding people aren't buying guns, then criminals will be the only ones buying them, and demand will drop......criminals are not 320 million people.
And yet the market is being flooded.
Like I said, it is absolutely stunning you dolts haven't figured out that if law-abiding demand drops, and the market is still flooded, then a LOT of that tsunami of death is going to end up washing into the hands of the wrong people.
And that is why our homicide rate is far, far, far higher than the UK and Canada and other OECD countries.
Yes, firearm ownership has went way down in urban America… It’s way up in rural America.The number of law abiding citizens buying guns is not 320 million. In fact, a much, much smaller percentage of Americans own guns than before. Less law abiding citizens are demanding guns.If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
Moron....if law abiding people aren't buying guns, then criminals will be the only ones buying them, and demand will drop......criminals are not 320 million people.
And yet the market is being flooded.
Like I said, it is absolutely stunning you dolts haven't figured out that if law-abiding demand drops, and the market is still flooded, then a LOT of that tsunami of death is going to end up washing into the hands of the wrong people.
And that is why our homicide rate is far, far, far higher than the UK and Canada and other OECD countries.
The number of law abiding citizens buying guns is not 320 million. In fact, a much, much smaller percentage of Americans own guns than before. Less law abiding citizens are demanding guns.If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
Moron....if law abiding people aren't buying guns, then criminals will be the only ones buying them, and demand will drop......criminals are not 320 million people.
And yet the market is being flooded.
Like I said, it is absolutely stunning you dolts haven't figured out that if law-abiding demand drops, and the market is still flooded, then a LOT of that tsunami of death is going to end up washing into the hands of the wrong people.
And that is why our homicide rate is far, far, far higher than the UK and Canada and other OECD countries.
I would be advocating protecting our rights by ensuring guns are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens.Assume that gun laws actually have an effect on homicide rates (and not some other factor). You would be advocating the sacrifice of liberty for security, right?It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
.
If we keep doing things your way, it is just a matter of time before the death toll rises so high that America will repeal the second amendment..
“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida ... to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.
Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'
I remember the complete mental shit fits the gun nuts had when they were told the Obama Administration was taking guns from crazy people without due process first.
LolTrump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second' |
"I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." - Donald Trump, The America We Deserve
MAGA!
“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida ... to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.
Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'
I remember the complete mental shit fits the gun nuts had when they were told the Obama Administration was taking guns from crazy people without due process first.
Nope. A smaller percentage of Americans own guns than 26 years ago.I would be advocating protecting our rights by ensuring guns are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens.Assume that gun laws actually have an effect on homicide rates (and not some other factor). You would be advocating the sacrifice of liberty for security, right?It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
.
If we keep doing things your way, it is just a matter of time before the death toll rises so high that America will repeal the second amendment..
How about 26 years of increasing gun ownership....
How much actual demand is out there and what facts do you have supporting that claim?The number of law abiding citizens buying guns is not 320 million. In fact, a much, much smaller percentage of Americans own guns than before. Less law abiding citizens are demanding guns.If law abiding people don't want a gun, the gun makers will still flood our country with guns!This brainless chant of "outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns" is just so much bullshit.
What the gun makers don't want is for demand for guns to drop and impact their bottom line. That's what this is really about.
If we tightened up our controls, and ensured only law abiding citizens had access to guns, then demand for guns would drop precipitously.
Just like if we get opioids under control, then the pharma companies would be making a lot less pills.
And our death rate would plunge.
That makes no sense at all you moron....... if law abiding people don't want a gun, they won't buy a gun....criminals will always need guns to defend their turf......
That's what is going on with guns and opioids. It's absolutely amazing you dolts have not figured that out.
Moron....if law abiding people aren't buying guns, then criminals will be the only ones buying them, and demand will drop......criminals are not 320 million people.
And yet the market is being flooded.
Like I said, it is absolutely stunning you dolts haven't figured out that if law-abiding demand drops, and the market is still flooded, then a LOT of that tsunami of death is going to end up washing into the hands of the wrong people.
And that is why our homicide rate is far, far, far higher than the UK and Canada and other OECD countries.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida ... to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.
Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'
I remember the complete mental shit fits the gun nuts had when they were told the Obama Administration was taking guns from crazy people without due process first.
Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is showing....
How do you know this? What is your source?Nope. A smaller percentage of Americans own guns than 26 years ago.I would be advocating protecting our rights by ensuring guns are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens.Assume that gun laws actually have an effect on homicide rates (and not some other factor). You would be advocating the sacrifice of liberty for security, right?It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
.
If we keep doing things your way, it is just a matter of time before the death toll rises so high that America will repeal the second amendment..
How about 26 years of increasing gun ownership....
Here's how it works:
Ten people own one gun each for a total of 10 guns.
Several years later, 2 people own 10 guns each for a total of 20 guns.
That's what is going on.
The percentage of Americans who own guns is much lower than just a few decades ago.
LolNope. A smaller percentage of Americans own guns than 26 years ago.I would be advocating protecting our rights by ensuring guns are only in the hands of law-abiding citizens.Assume that gun laws actually have an effect on homicide rates (and not some other factor). You would be advocating the sacrifice of liberty for security, right?It's a simple fact that those advanced countries which have stricter gun laws than us have much, much, much lower homicide rates. This is a fact which is willfully ignored and denied by the likes of you.
.
If we keep doing things your way, it is just a matter of time before the death toll rises so high that America will repeal the second amendment..
How about 26 years of increasing gun ownership....
Here's how it works:
Ten people own one gun each for a total of 10 guns.
Several years later, 2 people own 10 guns each for a total of 20 guns.
That's what is going on.
The percentage of Americans who own guns is much lower than just a few decades ago.
