ShootSpeeders
Gold Member
- May 13, 2012
- 20,232
- 2,366
- Thread starter
- #21
[
I studied that narrow 5-4 ruling in law school. The infamous equal protection of the 14th amendment was utilized (or bastardized). The opinion stated a State can not use makes laws discriminatory on based on a person immigration status. It was bastardized because immigration status isn't a protected group and immigration status wasn't what was getting discriminated against. It law was based on criminality of the illegal breaking the law by being in the country illegally!
I think you're trying to make some good points but but your terrible grammar makes the post nearly indecipherable.
Anyway - like roe wade and bush v gore, plyer v doe makes no legal sense. The judges took a bribe like they always do. All officials appointed for LIFE take bribes on everything.