Democrat Gay Advocate Guilty Child Porn

elektra

Platinum Member
Dec 1, 2013
25,666
11,941
915
Jewitt City, Connecticut
This is not unbelievable, but in a sane world it would be, a top ally of Nancy Pelosi has been convicted of Child Porn. Sick stuff with toddlers!!!

Larry Brinkin, A Democrat, a Homosexual, the 67 year old father of an adopted 13 year old child.

So those who will molest, exploit, and abuse children can legally adopt children, two men can adopt a boy if they like.

This is all okay because the politicians write rules and laws that makes it perfectly normal. Men who can not apply reason to how they gratify themselves sexually can make a reasonable decision in the raising of children that are not their own.

And here we have a convicted child pornography felon, A celebrated Democrat Homosexual Gay Marriage advocate, convicted of abuse against children, toddlers at that.

Larry Brinkin, had pictures of toddlers being sodomized, and it was okay for him to adopt a child? How could we of known, there were no signs he may be this type of person, nobody could of possibly of stopped this. Now a 13 year old boy knows his 67 year old Homosexual father is convicted of having pictures of babies being butt raped by men. I think a 13 year old is curious enough that the 13 year old already found the pictures, even though they were simply in the bedroom.

Now watch everyone scream this happens in normal marriage, between a man and a woman, which I am sure it does, homosexuals do marry woman and still have children so yes, this is a problem that is beyond strict homosexual marriage.

A 13 year old boy is curious by nature, I knew all my parents secrets at 13. Chances are Larry's boy found this stuff and was exposed to this. What about the other man? The wife/husband of Democrat of Brinkin? Where is he? Does he get to keep the boy? Is he attracted to boys? Or was he the "Boy" in a "Man"-"Boy" marriage.

Sexual deviation from the normal shall have zero consideration in the adoption of children?

San Francisco?s Gay Icon Larry Brinkin Guilty of Felony Child Porn Possession | CNS News

(CNSNews.com) – Larry Brinkin, who worked at the Human Rights Commission for the City of San Francisco for 22 years and was a prominent homosexual rights activist for more than 40 years, pleaded guilty to felony child pornography possession last week.

Brinkin is expected to serve six months in jail, five years of probation, and register as a sex offender for the rest of his life when he is sentenced on Mar. 5. But he likely will get to keep his city pension because possessing and viewing child porn apparently is not considered a crime of “moral turpitude” under San Francisco’s retirement/pension rules.

According to police, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle and SF Weekly, Brinkin had photographic images of children between the ages of 1 and 3 who were being sodomized and forced to perform oral sex on adult men.

- See more at: San Francisco?s Gay Icon Larry Brinkin Guilty of Felony Child Porn Possession | CNS News
 
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals are pedophiles? If you are, then someone should point out to you that the Vatican is still stocked full of child molesters and gay priests.

So much for the "sanctity of the church", right?
 
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals are pedophiles? If you are, then someone should point out to you that the Vatican is still stocked full of child molesters and gay priests.

So much for the "sanctity of the church", right?

You do know that, other than your back handed slam at the church, you just validated his argument? Good job.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.
 
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals are pedophiles? If you are, then someone should point out to you that the Vatican is still stocked full of child molesters and gay priests.

So much for the "sanctity of the church", right?

Why ask such a moronic question, I get it, you have no response to the facts that I posted so this discussion must be about me or the Church?

A openly gay male homosexual Democrat politician was able to advocate and influence politicians into allowing two men to marry and adopt a child, while in secret one was a part of an organization raping baby boys.

No limits on human sexuality and the adoption of children?
 
Are you suggesting that all gay people rape children because of what this one person did? If that is your argument, please go hang yourself.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?
 
But you are insinuating that all homosexuals are pedophiles because of this one person's actions, and that is fucking retarded. It is more rational to claim that all Christians are idiots for believing that the Bible is 100% historically accurate, or that a talking snake actually existed, or that a drunk built a boat large enough to hold two of every species of animal on Earth.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?
 
Not only was he a sick pedophile he was also a horrible White Power Racist and misogynist. If you read what he wrote about those 2 year old black (he uses the N-word) babies he loved to watch get raped and the little blond 1 year old "bitches", it is quite revealing. And terribly troubling, sad and disgusting. :(
 
CaféAuLait;8748729 said:
Not only was he a sick pedophile he was also a horrible White Power Racist and misogynist. If you read what he wrote about those 2 year old black (he uses the N-word) babies he loved to watch get raped and the little blond 1 year old "bitches", it is quite revealing. And terribly troubling, sad and disgusting. :(

But this is a DEMOCRAT!!!!
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?

The story is about a convicted Homosexual Democrat Pedophile Friend of Democrat Nancy Pelosi and Democrat Barbra Boxer. This Democrat Pedophile Homosexual advocated changing laws to allow himself, a Felon Homosexual Pedophile to adopt a baby boy. The law was changed, and now Larry Brinkin the Pedophile Homosexual was able to adopt the boy of is desire.

So you want to tell us what being a homosexual makes you or does not make you?

Thus far, it seems, Democrats will not debate a fact, they simply change the subject.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?

Most pedophiles are homosexual. That homosexuality is not a crime is an indictment of our society.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

uh you need to look into it, it's a huge thing, they used to let NAMBLA march in their rallies until they found out even most liberals wouldn't back them.

Lots of weirdo gays are into pedophilia, including your great poet Ginsburg.....he was a sick man, who is loved by the left......and they never talk about that part of him.
 
Validated his argument? What argument? One person was caught with child pornography, therefore all gay people rape children? Is that the argument? There's no way to validate that because it's fucking retarded. By that logic, if one Catholic priest is caught with child pornography then that must mean that all Catholic priests rape children.

You see that you're wrong.

A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?

This thread is about a convicted Democrat Homosexual Political Advocate who's lust and desire was for children, was able to advocate and successfully change laws on adoption, so that he, himself a Male Pedophile Homosexual would be able to adopt a Male Five year old boy.

My thread illustrates how the Democrats and Liberals will circle the wagons around a Pedophile and protect the said Pedophile from any criticism or discussion simply as long as that Pedophile is one of their own.
 
A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?

This thread is about a convicted Democrat Homosexual Political Advocate who's lust and desire was for children, was able to advocate and successfully change laws on adoption, so that he, himself a Male Pedophile Homosexual would be able to adopt a Male Five year old boy.

My thread illustrates how the Democrats and Liberals will circle the wagons around a Pedophile and protect the said Pedophile from any criticism or discussion simply as long as that Pedophile is one of their own.


couldn't agree more. And the left sees nothing wrong with this.
 
A Pedophile Homosexual Democrat Politician successfully changed laws so that he could adopt a child.

There are other threads on the Homosexuals that are Catholic Pedophiles, thank you for pointing out that homosexual pedophiles are everywhere.

Democrat Politicians and Catholics are also Pedophile Homosexuals, but not all, which is what your point is.

Good point, lets not forget the Homosexual Pedophiles are everywhere, except in the Boy Scouts? Right?

Being a homosexual doesn't make you a pedophile. Being a pedophile doesn't make you a homosexual. The act of homosexual sex isnt a crime. The act of pedophelia is.

Do you understand the difference?

This thread is about a convicted Democrat Homosexual Political Advocate who's lust and desire was for children, was able to advocate and successfully change laws on adoption, so that he, himself a Male Pedophile Homosexual would be able to adopt a Male Five year old boy.

My thread illustrates how the Democrats and Liberals will circle the wagons around a Pedophile and protect the said Pedophile from any criticism or discussion simply as long as that Pedophile is one of their own.

And he was rightfully convicted. So........what does this have to do with homosexuals again?
 
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals are pedophiles? If you are, then someone should point out to you that the Vatican is still stocked full of child molesters and gay priests.

So much for the "sanctity of the church", right?
Not only is he suggesting that gays are pedophiles, he is suggesting this has something to do with being a Democrat and that Democrats are more likely to be pedophiles or endorse pedophilia. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so scary: such conclusions about people lead to vigilantism and accusations about truly innocent people. Spreading this kind of sick thinking leads to lives being lost, literally, or lives being ruined.
 
Millions upon millions more children are sexually abused by heterosexuals than they are by homosexuals. Being gay or not has nothing to do with pedophilia.
 
Are you suggesting that all homosexuals are pedophiles? If you are, then someone should point out to you that the Vatican is still stocked full of child molesters and gay priests.

So much for the "sanctity of the church", right?
Not only is he suggesting that gays are pedophiles, he is suggesting this has something to do with being a Democrat and that Democrats are more likely to be pedophiles or endorse pedophilia. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so scary: such conclusions about people lead to vigilantism and accusations about truly innocent people. Spreading this kind of sick thinking leads to lives being lost, literally, or lives being ruined.

conclusions about people lead to vigilantism and accusations about truly innocent people

This is not a conclusion or accusation, it is a fact, Homosexual Democrat Activist Larry Brinkin was convicted owning pictures of 3 year old boys being butt raped.

This is not an accusation about an innocent person, as you suggest.

Homosexual Democrat Brinkin was pleaded guilty, as in refusing a trail on greater charges to plead to only one charge of being guilty. At that Democrat Brinkin lust and desire was to see 3 year olds raped.

And your worried that the posting of this story will lead to vigilantism against innocent people?
 

Forum List

Back
Top