Democrats are Progressives...do they seek a no boundaries, anything goes society?

In looking at almost any region run by Democrats you will quickly identify common denominators.
Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

The list goes on and on. We hear Democrats / Progressives / Liberals (all one and the same) complain about strict laws,

and here we thought you people reviled Democrats as Statist who wanted the government and the law to control everything.

Make up your fucking feeble mind, Nummie.
 
Dem's seek to control the people with an iron fist, what they think, say, eat, how they live, their income and wealth. The elite liberal ruling class is exempt of course.

Yeah, did you hear Sessions say they havent ruled out jailing Journalists. What a friggin liberal that guy

Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

:lol:

BUT, BUT, BUT....you love regulation...RIGHT?
Do you honestly believe that media should be able to say whatever about whoever and be able to hide behind "editorial"?

Question Marks is not a point made. Everytime you're confronted with facts you start asking uber silly questions like emotional feelings toward regulation like regulation is one thing

Be less stupid
 
Democrats protected their sexual predator friends in H'wood for years. The Secret Service checks every potential associate of the president and former presidents so Barry Hussein must have known about his good friend Harvey Weinstein's serial sexual abuse. Democrats threatened to ruin the economy of North Carolina unless the state agreed to place the mental and physical health of genetic women and young girls at risk by forcing them to admit men into the ladies room and boys into the girls locker room. It seems that the sissie democrat party cares more about fake women than real women.

So I take it you put Roy Moore in the category of Harvey Weinstein?

Moore isn't even in the same ballpark.

1 accusation vs. countless people coming forward can not be compared.

Add in the time difference between the two and you aren't even in the same sport.
 
Politics is a filthy business for sure.

In this day and age, anyone who actually wants to be President is fucked in the head.

Donald ran for attention.
Hillary ran for corruption.

Anyone who would truly be a good president is smart enough not to want the fucking job. You are guaranteed to have at least half the country that wants you to die. It’s the worst job ever....except for Hillary’s stylist.
 
Dem's seek to control the people with an iron fist, what they think, say, eat, how they live, their income and wealth. The elite liberal ruling class is exempt of course.

Yeah, did you hear Sessions say they havent ruled out jailing Journalists. What a friggin liberal that guy

Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

:lol:

BUT, BUT, BUT....you love regulation...RIGHT?
Do you honestly believe that media should be able to say whatever about whoever and be able to hide behind "editorial"?

Question Marks is not a point made. Everytime you're confronted with facts you start asking uber silly questions like emotional feelings toward regulation like regulation is one thing

Be less stupid

Hey bud...you're clearly confused by the simplest of things...that doesn't make what I say silly...that makes you a retard. Now go ahead and stay focused...try to answer the super complex question below. You have my permission. Ready GO!
"BUT, BUT, BUT....you love regulation...RIGHT?
Do you honestly believe that media should be able to say whatever about whoever and be able to hide behind "editorial"?"
 
Dem's seek to control the people with an iron fist, what they think, say, eat, how they live, their income and wealth. The elite liberal ruling class is exempt of course.

Yeah, did you hear Sessions say they havent ruled out jailing Journalists. What a friggin liberal that guy

Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

:lol:

BUT, BUT, BUT....you love regulation...RIGHT?
Do you honestly believe that media should be able to say whatever about whoever and be able to hide behind "editorial"?

Question Marks is not a point made. Everytime you're confronted with facts you start asking uber silly questions like emotional feelings toward regulation like regulation is one thing

Be less stupid

Hey bud...you're clearly confused by the simplest of things...that doesn't make what I say silly...that makes you a retard. Now go ahead and stay focused...try to answer the super complex question below. You have my permission. Ready GO!
"BUT, BUT, BUT....you love regulation...RIGHT?
Do you honestly believe that media should be able to say whatever about whoever and be able to hide behind "editorial"?"
Logical+Fallacy+20+-+Begging+The+Question.png
 
In looking at almost any region run by Democrats you will quickly identify common denominators.
Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

The list goes on and on. We hear Democrats / Progressives / Liberals (all one and the same) complain about strict laws,

and here we thought you people reviled Democrats as Statist who wanted the government and the law to control everything.

Make up your fucking feeble mind, Nummie.

Hey look, being against .GOV hand holding to the nth degree doesn't mean we're against law and government protecting good people from filthy Liberals and the like.
 
In looking at almost any region run by Democrats you will quickly identify common denominators.
Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

The list goes on and on. We hear Democrats / Progressives / Liberals (all one and the same) complain about strict laws,

and here we thought you people reviled Democrats as Statist who wanted the government and the law to control everything.

Make up your fucking feeble mind, Nummie.

Hey look, being against .GOV hand holding to the nth degree doesn't mean we're against law and government protecting good people from filthy Liberals and the like.

So stop pretending you don't like big government, nitwit.
 
Hey ye are the guys who want a kiddy fucker in the senate....

So I think Democrats are against Kiddy Fuckers in the Senate...

So he's been convicted in a court?

Was Clinton?

He was suspended from practicing law over the lewinsky incident:

Bill Clinton was Fined, Disbarred Over the Monica Lewinsky Scandal

No, he was suspended for a civil contempt charge that was about the rules of the court proceeding. It was neither criminal nor was it related to Lewinsky.
 
Hey ye are the guys who want a kiddy fucker in the senate....

So I think Democrats are against Kiddy Fuckers in the Senate...

So he's been convicted in a court?

Was Clinton?

He was suspended from practicing law over the lewinsky incident:

Bill Clinton was Fined, Disbarred Over the Monica Lewinsky Scandal

No, he was suspended for a civil contempt charge that was about the rules of the court proceeding. It was neither criminal nor was it related to Lewinsky.

From the Snopes article I quoted:

On his last day in office in 2001, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license in order to head off any criminal charges for lying under oath about his relationship with Lewinsky. Clinton has been eligible to seek reinstatement of his license since 2006, but as of 2013 he had not applied to do so.

From wikipedia:

Lewinsky scandal - Wikipedia

Two months after the Senate failed to convict him, President Clinton was held in civil contempt of court by Judge Susan Webber Wright for giving misleading testimony regarding his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, and was also fined $90,000 by Wright.[2][3] Clinton declined to appeal the civil contempt of court ruling, citing financial problems,[2] but still maintained that his testimony complied with Wright's earlier definition of sexual relations.[2] In 2001, his license to practice law was suspended in Arkansas for five years and later by the United States Supreme Court.[4]

So how is that not related to Lewinsky?
 
Democrats protected their sexual predator friends in H'wood for years. The Secret Service checks every potential associate of the president and former presidents so Barry Hussein must have known about his good friend Harvey Weinstein's serial sexual abuse. Democrats threatened to ruin the economy of North Carolina unless the state agreed to place the mental and physical health of genetic women and young girls at risk by forcing them to admit men into the ladies room and boys into the girls locker room. It seems that the sissie democrat party cares more about fake women than real women.

So I take it you put Roy Moore in the category of Harvey Weinstein?

Moore isn't even in the same ballpark.

1 accusation vs. countless people coming forward can not be compared.

Add in the time difference between the two and you aren't even in the same sport.

Well lets start with that everyone said he like them young, seen with high school girls when in his early thirties...

Numerous accounts of giving minors alcohol and corroborating witness seeing them together.

By the way which Senate seat is Harvey Weinstein running for and have you allegations of him trying to fuck kids...
 
Democrats protected their sexual predator friends in H'wood for years. The Secret Service checks every potential associate of the president and former presidents so Barry Hussein must have known about his good friend Harvey Weinstein's serial sexual abuse. Democrats threatened to ruin the economy of North Carolina unless the state agreed to place the mental and physical health of genetic women and young girls at risk by forcing them to admit men into the ladies room and boys into the girls locker room. It seems that the sissie democrat party cares more about fake women than real women.

So I take it you put Roy Moore in the category of Harvey Weinstein?

Moore isn't even in the same ballpark.

1 accusation vs. countless people coming forward can not be compared.

Add in the time difference between the two and you aren't even in the same sport.

Well lets start with that everyone said he like them young, seen with high school girls when in his early thirties...

Numerous accounts of giving minors alcohol and corroborating witness seeing them together.

By the way which Senate seat is Harvey Weinstein running for and have you allegations of him trying to fuck kids...

He married someone 14 years his junior, not common but not unheard of. Plenty of that on the left and the right.

Everyone had that one older friend who was "agent 21" (or Agent 18 back then).

The prime accusation is of inappropriate conduct with a 14 year old, and so far that one hasn't had much steam behind it.

Nah, in Hollywood Polanski is the kid toucher, as well as Sheen.
 
Dem's seek to control the people with an iron fist, what they think, say, eat, how they live, their income and wealth. The elite liberal ruling class is exempt of course.

Yeah, did you hear Sessions say they havent ruled out jailing Journalists. What a friggin liberal that guy

Lawlessness
High crime rate
Government dependency
Filth
Gender confusion
Illegal immigrant protection

:lol:

Your so called journalists are filthy lying scum.
 

Forum List

Back
Top