D
Dim Bulb
Guest
....and unofficial 'foreign aid.'
To be clear, this means how non-Americans influence our political determinations.....and how much they cost our nation.
1. No, it wasn't Russia that had the greatest effect on our recent election....it was the millions of illegal aliens from Mexico, who saw their residence here threatened.
2. And the foreign aid at issue was not that authorized by our government.
3. How's this for 'unofficial foreign aid'?
"Mexico's Remittances Reach Almost $27 Billion
Mexicans living abroad sent home almost $27 billion in 2016, the highest yearly figure on record, the central bank reported on Wednesday.
The remittances rose 8.8 percent, from $24.78 billion in 2015 to 26.97 billion last year.
The central bank said almost all the money was sent to Mexico by electronic transfers,....
Remittances have become Mexico's most important source of foreign income after auto exports of almost $34 billion per year. Remittances have far surpassed the $15.6 billion Mexico earns from oil exports and the $17.5 billion in tourism income Mexico received in 2015." Mexico's Remittances Reach Almost $27 Billion
That's $27 billion taken out of the American economy, and not used to recompense American workers. Who's responsible for this? Whoever encourages illegal aliens.....Democrats. And every Democrat voter.
4. As President Trump has correctly stated, illegal aliens residing in America nearly threw the presidential election to Bill's wife.
Their motive would be
a. to continue living in America, the central theme of the election...and...
b. the instructions by the snake, Obama, to go and vote- illegally- and his promise that no investigation would follow.
Yes...he actually said that.
5. Those trained to accept...unthinkingly....the Democrat's talking points, object to the suggestion that enough of the illegals could have voted to give Bill's wife the popular vote victory.
But central to that question is the number of illegals in America.
How many are there?
Enough to influence the popular vote????
You betcha'!!!
Coming right up.
Not disputing your belief in your argument, but would it be impolite to point out that the premise of your argument is flawed? It isn't just Democrats who want cheap labor in the states and who don't care where that cheap labor sends their money.
"...but would it be impolite to point out that the premise of your argument is flawed?"
Not at all.
Conservatives never shy away from debate, and I am never unable to support my views.
As far as some Republicans interest in keeping borders open...no disagreement.
But I function by the great Ronald Reagan's view: "bold colors, not pale pastels."
The thread is open to any Liberals, Democrats, socialists, one-worlders, etc, who would like to argue that open borders is as dominant a plan among Republicans as Democrats.
This, from the GOP platform: "Our highest priority, therefore, must be to secure our borders and all ports of entry and to enforce our immigration laws."
Government Reform | GOP
Have you noticed how weak, the Liberals in the thread, are?
Fair answer. Sounds like we disagree on the premise, which as you point out is fine. I however don't name call so I won't answer your questions about "liberals" because it really isn't a question, is it? It seems more of an opportunity to indulge in "us v. them - ism", I don't see how that sort of personal attack makes America great again. Indeed, quite the opposite. We are all Americans and we all deserve respect. Like Ronald Reagan said, "We can disagree [with our opponents] without being disagreeable."
There's really no competition.
How's this for a plan: I'll do things my way, you do them your way.
Fair enough. I am basically just pointing out that I think that some of the more nonsensical utterances from the WhiteHouse actually make no sense in making progress towards making America great again. And worse, they distract from some very real gains in policy we can make.
Thanks for the welcome to the Board.