Toro
Diamond Member
And by that, I mean too many old leaders and not enough young ones.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/capital-journal-democrats-are-short-of-fresh-new-faces-1415642183
Whatever one might think of the Republicans, they have more people in their 40s and 50s taking prominence in the party.
Among the many questions Democrats might ask as they ponder their course after last week’s electoral drubbing, here’s one that gets relatively little attention: Where are the party’s fresh young leaders?
Even after a stunning defeat, the Democrats’ hierarchy in Congress figures to be unchanged when leaders are picked for the new year.
In the House, Democrats will continue to be led by Nancy Pelosi , 74, who has been atop the Democratic caucus since 2002. The No. 2 House Democrat still will be Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, age 75.
In the Senate, Harry Reid , 74, will remain the party’s top dog, as he has for a decade; he now merely moves from majority leader to minority leader.
In the White House sits the still relatively young Barack Obama , 53, though, obviously, the clock is running down on his tenure. At his side sits Vice President Joe Biden , who turns 72 this month.
The party’s top vote-getter Tuesday was Gov. Jerry Brown of California, a 76-year-old political veteran who first won his current job in 1974. The runaway favorite to win the party’s presidential nomination in 2016 is, of course, Hillary Clinton , 67, who has been a fixture on the national scene for more than two decades.
Indeed, one of the most puzzling questions about the Democrats is this one: If the presidential nomination doesn’t go to either Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Biden, who are the plausible younger alternatives?
http://online.wsj.com/articles/capital-journal-democrats-are-short-of-fresh-new-faces-1415642183
Whatever one might think of the Republicans, they have more people in their 40s and 50s taking prominence in the party.