j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
- Oct 8, 2013
- 22,613
- 14,752
- Thread starter
- #41
What communists?No, that's not what I'm saying. Go back and read my post again.Congress should have access to all of that, no matter who is in office.Well, there it is people! I said it just a little earlier today right in here on these boards, and viola! That snotty little basterd Schiff comes out and brings it to pass....What a traitor to this country...
No longer can ANY President have a confidential call with another world leader...NO longer is ANY President afforded the latitude to have any privacy in running this country....We are done....No longer will we be anything resembling what was founded in 1776....
This is just the begining of how a nation gives over its freedom to tyranny!
Particularly if the officeholder is taking great pains to keep.them a secret by doing things like confiscating translator's notes and transferring transcripts to servers meant for ultra.secret documents.
So, a President doesn't have the lattitude to conduct policy anymore without congressional approval? Is that what you are saying?
The fact that in the early days of this Presidency, transcripts of calls with other foreign leaders was leaked to the press is justification that these calls be locked down...Now, seeing as that NOW you liberals are so concerned with secret servers, does that mean that now you admit that what Hillary Clinton did with her own private server was a crime?
That's exactly what you Communists are saying....
Communists like you.