Did anyone interfere with your investigation? Mueller...No.

[2aguy]

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

Well....you certainly understand the law from as a fascist.....guilty until the state decides you are not.

Moron...unindicted means you aren't even F*****g charged with anything....so you are just a moron. First, the campaign finance issue is not a crime....you twit.....at worst it is a fine. Just like obama when he came up with 3 million dollars in illegal campaign donations...you twit. And there was no obstruction...as mueller stated, over and over again. And if Trump had fired mueller, that would have been legal too.........he runs the Executive Branch you moron...he could have fired mueller at any time for any reason.

 

[2aguy]

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants......

 

[BWK]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

They are gathering additional evidence to come full circle with the case, which will make the Senate into traitors to country when they vote it down. I see exactly what Pelosi is doing.

 

[S.J.]

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

 

[BWK]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

Well....you certainly understand the law from as a fascist.....guilty until the state decides you are not.

Moron...unindicted means you aren't even F*****g charged with anything....so you are just a moron. First, the campaign finance issue is not a crime....you twit.....at worst it is a fine. Just like obama when he came up with 3 million dollars in illegal campaign donations...you twit. And there was no obstruction...as mueller stated, over and over again. And if Trump had fired mueller, that would have been legal too.........he runs the Executive Branch you moron...he could have fired mueller at any time for any reason.

OMG! Why are these people so fucking ......? Unindicted you dumb ass means he can't be indicted today because of the OLC rules. Why don't you folks disappear? You are too fucking ignorant to carry on an intelligent debate.

 

[BWK]

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

If you thought you had an argument, you don't. Because you didn't provide a rebuttal. So your cry baby "um, yeah it is moron", is an answer coming from a losing ignoramus, which is you. If you can't prove me wrong, then get lost.

 

[Faun]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

This post comes from a total ignoramus. Mueller could not reach a determination, because he wasn't supposed to and didn't have the power to. . That was the OLC opinion and rule. It was not in his job description. Most people with a functioning brain can understand that. You can't. The next part,was the fact that Trump could be indicted and would be indicted if he wasn't president. So, while the rule was one thing, and if given the power Mueller would have convicted. Congress has the authority to make that determination.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

This was not a trial.

 

[Faun]

Oh, they will care should the Russians decide to aid Democrats this time around. That's what it will take.

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

No dipshit....Russia is always trying to hack us...the hoax is blaming Trump when it was hilary who took 145 million dollars from Putin, and who likely used her secret, illegal servers to conduct that business with Russia, China and anyone else willing to buy access to the next President....

Since everyone just knew hilary was going to win.....



....and Russian agents who gave steele the lies about Trump when he was on the payroll of hilary and the democrats. Then obama used that fake information through his minions to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump.....

Mueller obviously wasn't in control of the investigation...likely it was that weisman guy......

The Hoax was that it was Trump, and not hilary who broke the law...

Hillary did not take $145 million from Putin.

That you assert such insane rantings does nothing other than to alert me that you're batshit crazy.

 

[Faun]

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime”

the we is his team which includes Mueller him self
if it was others that came to that determination as you are claiming he would have said they not we

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

 

[BWK]

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants......

No they didn't......it was a fake dossier that they then broke the law when they used it to get FISA warrants...... Do you have any idea how absolutely useless and inaccurate, this statement is? It doesn't say anything, it doesn't argue anything, but what it does say, is that you failed to prove me wrong. You people are nothing but cry babies without arguing anything down. I can't find any factual rebuttals so I'll just say "No they didn't" and pout like a crying baby. You are pitiful.

 

[S.J.]

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

Well....you certainly understand the law from as a fascist.....guilty until the state decides you are not.

Moron...unindicted means you aren't even F*****g charged with anything....so you are just a moron. First, the campaign finance issue is not a crime....you twit.....at worst it is a fine. Just like obama when he came up with 3 million dollars in illegal campaign donations...you twit. And there was no obstruction...as mueller stated, over and over again. And if Trump had fired mueller, that would have been legal too.........he runs the Executive Branch you moron...he could have fired mueller at any time for any reason.

OMG! Why are these people so fucking ......? Unindicted you dumb ass means he can't be indicted today because of the OLC rules. Why don't you folks disappear? You are too fucking ignorant to carry on an intelligent debate.

LMAO!

 

[BWK]

The problem is that all this bad stuff done & said by Trump is already known & trey don't care. I mean, there was the tape of a 13 year old & they didn't care.

No one said it better than trump himself... he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose support.

It's a cult.

And this is what mueller was trying to hide...


Beyond his purview

Turchie holds that the testimony of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees this past Wednesday confirmed the existence of a hostile intelligence operation against Donald Trump (video below). Suffice it to say that Turchie takes up issues of fact that have come within our purview on several occasions.

Kim Strassel brings Mueller’s testimony within the purview of her weekly Wall Street Journal column today. She scopes out “What Mueller was trying to hide.” The Journal posts Strassel’s column online together with the video below.
---

Strassel continues with this quotable quote:

The most notable aspect of the Mueller report was always what it omitted: the origins of this mess.

Christopher Steele’s dossier was central to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe, the basis of many of the claims of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Yet the Mueller authors studiously wrote around the dossier, mentioning it only in perfunctory terms. The report ignored Mr. Steele’s paymaster, Fusion GPS, and its own ties to Russians. It also ignored Fusion’s paymaster, the Clinton campaign, and the ugly politics behind the dossier hit job.

Mr. Mueller’s testimony this week put to rest any doubt that this sheltering was deliberate. In his opening statement he declared that he would not “address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called Steele Dossier.” The purpose of those omissions was obvious, as those two areas go to the heart of why the nation has been forced to endure years of collusion fantasy.

I got only as far as the silly part about it being a hoax. There was no hoax. It was not a hoax that Russia hacked us -- that was real. It was not a hoax that trump was surrounded by people with ties to Russia -- that was real. It was not a hiax that some of those people had direct contact with some of the Russian hackers and Wikileaks -- that was real. It was not a hoax that it needed to be investigated -- that too was real.

Since the day Mueller was appointed Special Counsel, trump was doing everything he could to marginalize Mueller. Extending to labeling his investigation as a Russia-collusion Hoax, knowing full well his cult members would run with it. Y'all are nothing if not faithful servants.

No dipshit....Russia is always trying to hack us...the hoax is blaming Trump when it was hilary who took 145 million dollars from Putin, and who likely used her secret, illegal servers to conduct that business with Russia, China and anyone else willing to buy access to the next President....

Since everyone just knew hilary was going to win.....



....and Russian agents who gave steele the lies about Trump when he was on the payroll of hilary and the democrats. Then obama used that fake information through his minions to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump.....

Mueller obviously wasn't in control of the investigation...likely it was that weisman guy......

The Hoax was that it was Trump, and not hilary who broke the law...

Hillary did not take $145 million from Putin.

That you assert such insane rantings does nothing other than to alert me that you're batshit crazy.

They all are. They come here to pout and cry, complaining that the Democrats took theirs pacifiers. They argue shit on this forum every day. it's a crowd of cultist losers.

 

[BWK]

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

Well....you certainly understand the law from as a fascist.....guilty until the state decides you are not.

Moron...unindicted means you aren't even F*****g charged with anything....so you are just a moron. First, the campaign finance issue is not a crime....you twit.....at worst it is a fine. Just like obama when he came up with 3 million dollars in illegal campaign donations...you twit. And there was no obstruction...as mueller stated, over and over again. And if Trump had fired mueller, that would have been legal too.........he runs the Executive Branch you moron...he could have fired mueller at any time for any reason.

OMG! Why are these people so fucking ......? Unindicted you dumb ass means he can't be indicted today because of the OLC rules. Why don't you folks disappear? You are too fucking ignorant to carry on an intelligent debate.

LMAO!

Exhibit A people!

 

[BWK]

Where is the part where Mueller says Trump committed no crime? No obstruction?

He lied. There is nothing in the Mueller report that says that.

For the umpteenth time, Trump does not have to be proven innocent, he has to be proven GUILTY. Mueller and his team of Trump haters failed to do that. You lose.

He's already been proven guilty. He has two unindicted cases. One for obstruction, and the other for campaign finance crimes. Both are felonies. And for the "umteenth" time, that is reality.

If he's already been proven guilty, why aren't they impeaching him?

Because impeachment isn't always the appropriate response. Something the right doesn't comprehend.

They don't understand. Now give them back their pacifiers.

 

[BWK]

Wrong! He can be indicted after he leaves office via the Mueller report.

for what? a crime that was determined Trump didn't commit?

The report or testimony by Mueller never said Trump did not commit a crime.

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”


innocent till proven guilty
it was determined no crime was committed and because you are innocent till proven guilty Trump remained innocent

So no one ever committed a crime other than those who were convicted in court.

so you don't believe in innocent till proven guilty? how fascist of you

He's already been proven guilty. Get a life.

 

[BWK]

It has become obvious to a lot of people that mueller wasn't the leader in this persecution of President Trump special counsel office.........When he didn't know about Fusion GPS, or the fact that they actually met with the Russian Lawyer before and after her meeting with Don Jr............we now know that mueller was simply the sad face of the democrat machine,

Mueller exposed Trump as being compromised by Russia; Some surprises among damning Mueller testimony, bad day for Trump

Sorry, dipstick........hilary and the democrats are the only ones who actually used Russian assets against the opposition political party......

There is nothing illegal in hiring a opposition research. There is nothing illegal about investigstiong hjow Trump liued about his business in Russia,,.

If

It has become obvious to a lot of people that mueller wasn't the leader in this persecution of President Trump special counsel office.........When he didn't know about Fusion GPS, or the fact that they actually met with the Russian Lawyer before and after her meeting with Don Jr............we now know that mueller was simply the sad face of the democrat machine,

Mueller exposed Trump as being compromised by Russia; Some surprises among damning Mueller testimony, bad day for Trump

Sorry, dipstick........hilary and the democrats are the only ones who actually used Russian assets against the opposition political party......

It is not illegal to investigate Trump's business in Russia.

It is illegal to work with a foreign government to help win an election.

Tell us again why Trump lied about his campaign's contact with the Russians & why he lied about Trump Tower Moscow.

Did Trump lie to the FBI or Mueller?
I don't recall him being questioned by them.

He lied to you. He lied to America. Why????

Why did Trump lie about his campaign's russian contacts.

Why did several of his campaign people lie about Russian contacts.

Why did Trump lie about his business in Russia.

Why the fuck can't one of you dumbass Trumpettes answer this?

Because they already know the answer. And they are willing to destroy this country by keeping it to themselves.

 

[BWK]

It appears that Barr has his work cut out for him. The question now is will he have enough time to bring all the charges that need to be filed?

Why would there be charges when no evidence has been found?

 

[S.J.]

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

If you thought you had an argument, you don't. Because you didn't provide a rebuttal. So your cry baby "um, yeah it is moron", is an answer coming from a losing ignoramus, which is you. If you can't prove me wrong, then get lost.

You have it backwards, dickwad. Show me where the FBI corroborated the dossier's accuracy. That's fucking laughable.

 

[BWK]

Damn that's one quick backpedal loser. If parts of a document are not verified, the whole thing is useless. Comey had the whole thing stamped "verified", KNOWING it was not. That's illegal. Period. End of game.

LOLOLOLOL

Great, show me the FISC regulations that state a document can't be used if some parts are verified and some parts aren't......

What I've seen in courts is that if somebody lies, their whole testimony is thrown out. I mean.....they are presenting
the evidence in front of a judge, right?

Right. And if their evidence is tainted it's ALL thrown out. That's basic law 101.

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

Lol! The dossier IS THE WITNESS, the case is Trump and Russia.
Without the WITNESS there is no case.

How fucking stupid are you, Dave? I haven't seen any boundaries yet.

Trump/Russia was not begun because of the Dossier. Our own FBI found signs of a problem with Russia. Which is why they warned both campaigns to come forward if they heard anything. Trump did not. Clinton did.

 

[BWK]

No it is not.

If you are in court charged with murder and one witness is discovered to be lying, that witness's testimony is thrown out. Not the entire case.

How fucking stupid are you people?

What an idiotic comparison. The FISA application was based on the dossier, moron. If it's fake, there is no basis for the warrant. There was no other evidence presented that would have justified a warrant. If there had been, they would not have had to use the FAKE dossier. IOW, stupid, the entire case for collusion was based on a fucking LIE.

The Dossier is not fake. The FBI corroborated its accuracy.

Um, yeah it is, moron. That's not even in dispute (except by idiots like you).

If you thought you had an argument, you don't. Because you didn't provide a rebuttal. So your cry baby "um, yeah it is moron", is an answer coming from a losing ignoramus, which is you. If you can't prove me wrong, then get lost.

You have it backwards, dickwad. Show me where the FBI corroborated the dossier's accuracy. That's fucking laughable.

That's common knowledge. It's been linked on this forum dozens of times. You have Google right? Don't be a pussy and look for yourself.