Lovebears65
Gold Member
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
The reports they refer to is the fact that there may be millions of people in california that have been exposed to the chinese disease that never showed symptoms
so the overall fatality rate may be no worse than the common flu
but the jury is still out on that
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
I wonder if this conversation went down on April 1st. The one stagehand says "7000 cases in California" while the current official number is about five times that (33,865).
And obviously, no vaccine exists either. Good GODS some people are gullible.
So the press already got their vaccine and the numbers from Stanford mortality rate is only 1/10th that what they say it is ..
I wonder if this conversation went down on April 1st. The one stagehand says "7000 cases in California" while the current official number is about five times that (33,865).
And obviously, no vaccine exists either. Good GODS some people are gullible.
Gullible – perhaps.
More likely intentionally dishonest; a failed attempt to propagate the lie that the health and safety protocols were unwarranted.