Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

[OohPooPahDoo]

Like I said: The Democrat won. That's all that matters.

Its not like you said. My argument is based on the law. Your argument is based on your hatred for Democrats.

What part of "I don't care who wins as long as the election is fair" is failing to shoehorn its way into your head?

The part where you keep bringing up "The Democrat won" as an argument.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Was this a legit election?

There could be more fraudulent votes cast than the difference between the two candidate in the final tally.

Franken was voted in with illegal votes. Dimwits do not care if it is legal or not, but they are idiots.

 

[candycorn]

Republicans are whiny bitches when they lose

You really do hate democracy.

Let's hear you whine Dave

Not Fair!

I don't remember a lot of Democrats taking the loss in 2000 very graciously. Just saying. But it does seem to be a trait with them vs. an episode with "us".

 

[AmericanFirst]

Which is still short of the 312 votes Senator Franken won by

Facts like that are irrelevant, sir! Please get on the Whining Express.

Why do Democrats hate democracy?

Because they are socialists backed by the communist party.

 

[rightwinger]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

 

[Ava]

Was this a legit election?

There could be more fraudulent votes cast than the difference between the two candidate in the final tally.

You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.

 

[Sarah G]

Some research I did:




2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Results after election contest[1][2][64][65]
Party Candidate Votes
DFL Al Franken 1,212,629
Republican Norm Coleman 1,212,317


The difference?

312 votes.

The report finds that 113 individuals who voted illegally in the 2008 election have been convicted of the crime, "ineligible voter knowingly votes" under Minnesota Statute 201.014.

--

Minnesota's recent charges and convictions stem from research initiated by Minnesota Majority. The research identified upwards of 2,800 ineligible felons believed to have unlawfully voted in Minnesota's 2008 general election.

--

At the time of this report, nearly 200 additional cases are still pending trial.​

So: 113 convictions. 200 more pending cases. 2,800 ineligibles possibly voted.

Still obsessing over this after umpteen million recounts. Wahh.

 

[kaz]

The Senate is a better place with Al Franken in it to be sure. Dog gone it, people like him.

Good one...

Why someone would purposely be on the side of a hint of impropriety in the electoral process when there is a simple fix available to all is brainless.

Because Democrats know they are the ones who commit the most fraud in elections. If they actually thought it was Republicans, they'd be demanding three photo IDs.

 

[The T]

Was this a legit election?

There could be more fraudulent votes cast than the difference between the two candidate in the final tally.

You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.

Stalin WAS the law. Millions died at his hand that didn't agree.

 

[daveman]

Its not like you said. My argument is based on the law. Your argument is based on your hatred for Democrats.

What part of "I don't care who wins as long as the election is fair" is failing to shoehorn its way into your head?

The part where you keep bringing up "The Democrat won" as an argument.

But that's what Democrats keep telling me. It means they don't care that the process was corrupted; as long as their guy won, that's all that matters.

If the process was not corrupted, and the Democrat won, I wouldn't be complaining.

 

[daveman]

You really do hate democracy.

Let's hear you whine Dave

Not Fair!

I don't remember a lot of Democrats taking the loss in 2000 very graciously. Just saying. But it does seem to be a trait with them vs. an episode with "us".

Not really.

 

[daveman]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

Wrong.

 

[daveman]

Some research I did:




2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Results after election contest[1][2][64][65]
Party Candidate Votes
DFL Al Franken 1,212,629
Republican Norm Coleman 1,212,317


The difference?

312 votes.

The report finds that 113 individuals who voted illegally in the 2008 election have been convicted of the crime, "ineligible voter knowingly votes" under Minnesota Statute 201.014.

--

Minnesota's recent charges and convictions stem from research initiated by Minnesota Majority. The research identified upwards of 2,800 ineligible felons believed to have unlawfully voted in Minnesota's 2008 general election.

--

At the time of this report, nearly 200 additional cases are still pending trial.​

So: 113 convictions. 200 more pending cases. 2,800 ineligibles possibly voted.

Still obsessing over this after umpteen million recounts. Wahh.

Were the recounts conducted before or after the convictions for voter fraud were handed down?

Looks like you're another one who doesn't care about democracy -- the Democrat won. That's all that matters.

 

[AmericanFirst]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

Of course you are wrong, it did. Anyone with half a brain can figure out the dimwit strategy, win at all costs, even if it means cheating.

 

[Sarah G]

Some research I did:




2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Results after election contest[1][2][64][65]
Party Candidate Votes
DFL Al Franken 1,212,629
Republican Norm Coleman 1,212,317


The difference?

312 votes.

The report finds that 113 individuals who voted illegally in the 2008 election have been convicted of the crime, "ineligible voter knowingly votes" under Minnesota Statute 201.014.

--

Minnesota's recent charges and convictions stem from research initiated by Minnesota Majority. The research identified upwards of 2,800 ineligible felons believed to have unlawfully voted in Minnesota's 2008 general election.

--

At the time of this report, nearly 200 additional cases are still pending trial.​

So: 113 convictions. 200 more pending cases. 2,800 ineligibles possibly voted.

Still obsessing over this after umpteen million recounts. Wahh.

Were the recounts conducted before or after the convictions for voter fraud were handed down?

Looks like you're another one who doesn't care about democracy -- the Democrat won. That's all that matters.

The man the voters wanted as their senator won. I see you don't believe in the American process. Perhaps you wanted Supreme Court intervention once again. So sad.

 

[The T]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

Of course you are wrong, it did. Anyone with half a brain can figure out the dimwit strategy, win at all costs, even if it means cheating.

They know they lose in the arena of ideas. Therefore cheating and masking it with 'social dogma', and intimidating anyone that questions is their way. Intellectual dishonesty.

 

[rightwinger]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

Wrong.

Show us the numbers where invalid ballots start to affect the results

You got nothing Dave

 

[AmericanFirst]

Still obsessing over this after umpteen million recounts. Wahh.

Were the recounts conducted before or after the convictions for voter fraud were handed down?

Looks like you're another one who doesn't care about democracy -- the Democrat won. That's all that matters.

The man the voters wanted as their senator won. I see you don't believe in the American process. Perhaps you wanted Supreme Court intervention once again. So sad.

It is idiot dimwits that do not believe in the American process, and lie saying they do. IDIOTS!!!!

 

[AmericanFirst]

*
Did voter fraud alter the outcome of the MN 2008 Senate race?

To any one with any sense of probability, the answer is an obvious NO

Wrong.

Show us the numbers where invalid ballots start to affect the results

You got nothing Dave

Daveman is correct and you are still wrong.

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong.

Show us the numbers where invalid ballots start to affect the results

You got nothing Dave

Daveman is correct and you are still wrong.

If he is then show me the relevant numbers. What assumptions do you have to make before questioned ballots start to affect the results?

60-40 of the votes went to Franken?
75-25 of the votes went to Franken?

ALL the votes went to Franken?