US policy in March 2003 was operating along with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441. That resolution took into account every single dastardly thing that Saddam Hussein had done since 1990 Including the invasion of Kuwait.
He was given a final opportunity to comply under the United State war policy at that time. That means the invasion of Kuwait had absolutely nothing to do with making a determination if Iraq was disarmed.
My discussion points do not leave that out.
....
None of that really follows.
That US policy was "operating along with 1441" does not support any of what you say.
That resolution did NOT take into account every single think Saddam ever did.
That the resolution took any of it into account, does not mean that the rest of the context doesn't matter any more.
NOthing in your post supports the idea that the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with WMDS/disarmament.
Your discussion points are structured like a supporting argument, but are really fairly random, unrelated stuff.