Dims call for investigation into Barr firing AG from SDNY

[eddiew]

They must have some awful shit on the moron Trump and his friends to try and stop the investigating Guess all of trumps idiots don't get it

 

[meaner gene]

So Barr was bribed to fire this AG?

I am not connecting your dots.

The Ukraine president fired the investigator. Perfectly legal, no need for any kind of investigation.

Right?

 

[Nostra]

Damn you're thick. A firing can be investigated and if found to be illegal, can be reversed. There is a remedy to an illegal firing.
Meanwhile replublicans investigated a pardon, which even if plainly illegal, has no legal reversal. The only thing that can come of it, is political talking points.

To put it simply. Investigating firing the US attorney from SDNY (and this is the third one) has a legal fix. While the republican investigation of a pardon was just politics.

So? Pardons have no relationship to the topic.

 

[meaner gene]

They must have some awful shit on the moron Trump and his friends to try and stop the investigating Guess all of trumps idiots don't get it

Trump fired the first US Attorney, and replaced him with the best man for the job. Then he fired the best man for the job, and replaced him with another, and then another.

And the only justification for the firing(s), "because I can"

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Nostra]

The Ukraine president fired the investigator. Perfectly legal, no need for any kind of investigation.

Right?

Who wants to investigate the President of the Ukraine, Dummy?

You are lost in left field.

 

[meaner gene]

So? Pardons have no relationship to the topic.

The topic is invesgations.

Yall went hot and heavy into investigating everything from pardons to investigator firings in Ukraine.

Suddenly you don't want to why Trump fired the same US Attorney three times. When the thing they had in common, was the investigation of Trump inc.

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[DGS49]

They can inquire as much as they want. When an official is legally exercising his discretion, no one needs to be satisfied about the justification, unless it is clearly wrongful. If Barr (NOT Trump) decided he didn't like the way he tied his tie, that is sufficient and perfectly legal (and Constitutional).

 

[colfax_m]

They can inquire as much as they want. When an official is legally exercising his discretion, no one needs to be satisfied about the justification, unless it is clearly wrongful. If Barr (NOT Trump) decided he didn't like the way he tied his tie, that is sufficient and perfectly legal (and Constitutional).

We wouldn’t know that the justification is wrong until we investigate, now would we?

 

[eddiew]

Trump fired the first US Attorney, and replaced him with the best man for the job. Then he fired the best man for the job, and replaced him with another, and then another.

And the only justification for the firing(s), "because I can"

Remember the game show hosts favorite line ??? YOU'RE FIRED and the pos carried it into the WH

 

[eddiew]

They can inquire as much as they want. When an official is legally exercising his discretion, no one needs to be satisfied about the justification, unless it is clearly wrongful. If Barr (NOT Trump) decided he didn't like the way he tied his tie, that is sufficient and perfectly legal (and Constitutional).

BUT what if he was afraid they were investigating trump and friends and that was the reason he was fired?

 

[Nostra]

We wouldn’t know that the justification is wrong until we investigate, now would we?

Using your ”logic”, every decision needs to be investigated just to see if we can find something wrong.

Idiot.

 

[Nostra]

BUT what if he was afraid they were investigating trump and friends and that was the reason he was fired?

Investigations don’t stop just because someone leaves, Crayon Muncher.

 

[eddiew]

Investigations don’t stop just because someone leaves, Crayon Muncher.

They sure as shit do when you put your own asskisser in place

 

[Nostra]

They sure as shit do when you put your own asskisser in place

Link to an investigation stopped?

 

[iceberg]

Presidential pardons are also "fully legal " action. Only they are not if you bribe or blackmail the person into issuing one.

Hence the need to investigate

Since Trumps keeps firing the investigators.

well shit, since the left seems to keep investigating bullshit claims. have ANY of their investigations come up with ANYTHING related to the investigation?

 

[iceberg]

They can inquire as much as they want. When an official is legally exercising his discretion, no one needs to be satisfied about the justification, unless it is clearly wrongful. If Barr (NOT Trump) decided he didn't like the way he tied his tie, that is sufficient and perfectly legal (and Constitutional).

yea, when the officers step mom in atlanta was fired for being his step-mom the left was SO SHE DESERVED IT!!! RIGHT TO WORK!!! THEY CAN FIRE IF THEY WANT!!!!

ok - then so can barr, according to the law.

NO FOUL WE WILL INVESTIGATE!!!!!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Investigate the dems for the illegal investigations.

 

[Nostra]

Investigate the dems for the illegal investigations.

We won’t know if they were justified until we investigate.