Do liberals want GM's subsidies cut, yes or no? Please, just for the libs.

[Theowl32]

Question just for board libs.

What sort of double talk bullshit will liberals give?

We know they would never answer yes or no.

Besides, their no never means no, and their yes never means yes.

 

[danielpalos]

we should be cutting trade wars, not subsidies.

 

[bendog]

Specify the subsidies.

 

[Claudette]

Specify the subsidies.

Here they are.

General Motors | Subsidy Tracker

 

[Theowl32]

Did liberals ever decide what the definition of "is," is?

 

[Oddball]

Guess what, chumps....

 

[bendog]

Specify the subsidies.

Here they are.

General Motors | Subsidy Tracker

But that's not really it. It notes it doesn't show loans repaid. And actually I was wondering if anyone was thinking about the tax deductions for employee hc

But if you're just attempting to say there's no difference between tariffs or govt induced increases to steel costs and subsidies state and local govts offer to get industry to move in .... that's just a false comparison. There's no similarity between reasons for them or benefits/costs to communities. It's not even apples and oranges.

 

[danielpalos]

Guess what, chumps....

let's abolish our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

 

[Oddball]

let's abolish our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

And "poverty"....But that's a bridge too far for bootlicking economic ignoramuses like you.

 

[BlackFlag]

Question just for board libs.

What sort of double talk bullshit will liberals give?

We know they would never answer yes or no.

Besides, their no never means no, and their yes never means yes.

They don’t receive subsidies. Sober up and try again.

 

[Claudette]

Specify the subsidies.

Here they are.

General Motors | Subsidy Tracker

But that's not really it. It notes it doesn't show loans repaid. And actually I was wondering if anyone was thinking about the tax deductions for employee hc

But if you're just attempting to say there's no difference between tariffs or govt induced increases to steel costs and subsidies state and local govts offer to get industry to move in .... that's just a false comparison. There's no similarity between reasons for them or benefits/costs to communities. It's not even apples and oranges.

Well according the Trump they still owe 11 billion. I'm sure he knows.

I think a lot of what they get is grants and tax breaks.

Not sure how it all evens out but they do owe 11 billion.

 

[jc456]

Specify the subsidies.

Here they are.

General Motors | Subsidy Tracker

But that's not really it. It notes it doesn't show loans repaid. And actually I was wondering if anyone was thinking about the tax deductions for employee hc

But if you're just attempting to say there's no difference between tariffs or govt induced increases to steel costs and subsidies state and local govts offer to get industry to move in .... that's just a false comparison. There's no similarity between reasons for them or benefits/costs to communities. It's not even apples and oranges.

The payment is great, what’s greater is tax money that saved them and their interest remains in Mexico! Shameful

 

[Theowl32]

Guess what, chumps....

HE, HE, HE, OWWWWWNED SLAAAAAAAVVVVEES!!!!!!!!

 

[fncceo]

let's abolish our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

And "poverty"....But that's a bridge to far for bootlicking economic ignoramuses like you.

'too' far

 

[protectionist]

we should be cutting trade wars, not subsidies.

So we can go back to the idiocy of Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, and Obama ?..., and give China unrestricted access to our massive/wealthy MARKET, while China screens us out from theirs, with 25% tariffs ?

No need to continue with stupidity.

 

[danielpalos]

let's abolish our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

And "poverty"....But that's a bridge too far for bootlicking economic ignoramuses like you.

well, if you are going to "call me on it"; there is a market friendly solution to simple poverty that could end the need for an alleged war on poverty.

 

[danielpalos]

we should be cutting trade wars, not subsidies.

So we can go back to the idiocy of Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, and Obama ?..., and give China unrestricted access to our massive/wealthy MARKET, while China screens us out from theirs, with 25% tariffs ?

No need to continue with stupidity.

one option is to subsidize our markets to the extent they are affect by those tariffs.

we have quantum computing now.

 

[bendog]

Question just for board libs.

What sort of double talk bullshit will liberals give?

We know they would never answer yes or no.

Besides, their no never means no, and their yes never means yes.

They don’t receive subsidies. Sober up and try again.

Well they do. In little old Miss, we gave state and local tax breaks and built infrastructure just to attract auto and tire mftrs. And other states do as well. BUUUT those actions are taken to make it CHEAPER TO MFTR something. And the econ burden is shared by taxpayers. Conversely, Trump increases the price of cars (and other goods) to benefit the steel industry, and even then there aren't US blast furnaces beign built. There's been an increase in steel being repurposed but the econ benefit is no where near the cost.

It's a logically failed thread.

 

[protectionist]

one option is to subsidize our markets to the extent they are affect by those tariffs.

we have quantum computing now.

I prefer putting us back on an even keel as Trump is doing. Only question is why did 3 other presidents go along with this lunacy ? Did they think this was some kind of insurance against china making war against us ?

The only thing China should be doing is kissing our ass, for saving theirs in World War II, or they all be speaking Japanese right now.

 

[BlackFlag]

Question just for board libs.

What sort of double talk bullshit will liberals give?

We know they would never answer yes or no.

Besides, their no never means no, and their yes never means yes.

They don’t receive subsidies. Sober up and try again.

Well they do. In little old Miss, we gave state and local tax breaks and built infrastructure just to attract auto and tire mftrs. And other states do as well. BUUUT those actions are taken to make it CHEAPER TO MFTR something. And the econ burden is shared by taxpayers. Conversely, Trump increases the price of cars (and other goods) to benefit the steel industry, and even then there aren't US blast furnaces beign built. There's been an increase in steel being repurposed but the econ benefit is no where near the cost.

It's a logically failed thread.

Trump cannot rescind state subsidies.