Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,901
- 1,530
Human memory isn't perfect and never was. And Troubadours were performers and to think they didn't ad lib to get better reactions from their audience is naive.That wasn't how it worked back then. Troubadours and bards in pre-literate ancient England could memorize all of the Canterbury tales, and go from place to place making a living. . .
The reason much of ancient literate, like the bible, is written as it is, in stanzas, couplets, etc., is because folks had memorized it all. In ancient times, folks had memorized entire works, like the Ulysses, the Iliad, etc. In this age when folks have limited attention spans, and memories, we can't imagine such a thing, but it was a regular feature of ancient life before the invention of the printing press.
Many ancient cultures who had no written language, had rich oral traditions. You denigrate them all by your analogy.
If you want to believe that paradigm though, feel free though.
Go spend a little more time studying culture anthropology.
And you have it backwards anyway. The bible was written years after events there was no book to memorize before the book was written.
This is why oral histories are innacurate. We have one person telling another person something then that person telling another person what he thinks he heard. Multiply that by hundreds or thousands of years and there is no way the accuracy remains 100%
Last edited: