Do you support release of "original" transcript of Trump/Ukraine call?

Do you support release of "original" transcript of Trump/Ukraine call?


  • Total voters
    42
Ukraine/Collusion/etc etc wolf wolf
how many times can you say ''WOLF"" ????
hahahahahhahahahahahahahah
You probably believe that Dear Leader was going to fund the G-7 out of pocket at Doral for the good of us all, right? Now, beat it.
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
We already have the original.

Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
We already have the original.

Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
Let’s release all of Obie’s calls at the same time. And from now on all presidential phone calls should be broadcast live and unfiltered.

That should work just fine.
Are you inferring that all future Presidents will be a shakedown artist like Trump is?
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
We already have the original.

Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
We already have the original.

Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
sure conservatives have no problem with Trump re releasing the transcript !! and why we are at it if the transcript is different from what Schift read and lied about do you have a problem with charging Schift with treason against the United States of America for attempting to overthrow an election with lies ??

Treason? You have no clue when you post such a stupid comment.

he lied in a congressional hearing when he red the transcript !!! he used the lie to legitimize moving forward with impeachment [removing a duly elected president ] with A FALSE STATEMENT ! Or are you trying to say that shift read the actual transcript word for word ....and what in the Ukraine transcript is illegal ??? it never said do what we want or we will not give aide to the Ukraine !!! or is asking a country to look into corruption illegal now !

U.S. Code § 2381.Treason:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Also, see Art. 3, sec. 3, clauses 2 & 3.
 
We already have the original.

Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
Again, you have the undoctored copy. If you believe otherwise, there is no help for you.
 
Please share it with us.
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
Again, you have the undoctored copy. If you believe otherwise, there is no help for you.

Really? How do you know that? How could you know that? Are you suggesting the Lt. Col. Vindman and others are lying?
 
It isn't a joke to hold Democrats to the same standard as Trump. Its deadly serious.
yes and the future of our country is at stake !! what we are witnessing is an assault on our country being carried out by an extreme left wing enemy in an attempt to overthrow an election !
 
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
Again, you have the undoctored copy. If you believe otherwise, there is no help for you.

Really? How do you know that? How could you know that? Are you suggesting the Lt. Col. Vindman and others are lying?
and how would you know that it isnt exactly what was said !! and yes we are saying that some people are lying !! remember there are others that have stated that their was no wrong doing !! and lets be real you dont give a damn if there was anything done wrong or not ...... you hate the president ,you hate capitalism and you hate this country ...and you dont care how you get rid of Trump as long as you get rid of him .....be man and admit it !! or are you to much of a coward ..[and i think you are ] to say it ... just say it we all know it ... we all know the democrats will do anything to throw out Trump ...so just say it coward .........
 
Last edited:
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
sure conservatives have no problem with Trump re releasing the transcript !! and why we are at it if the transcript is different from what Schift read and lied about do you have a problem with charging Schift with treason against the United States of America for attempting to overthrow an election with lies ??

Treason? You have no clue when you post such a stupid comment.

he lied in a congressional hearing when he red the transcript !!! he used the lie to legitimize moving forward with impeachment [removing a duly elected president ] with A FALSE STATEMENT ! Or are you trying to say that shift read the actual transcript word for word ....and what in the Ukraine transcript is illegal ??? it never said do what we want or we will not give aide to the Ukraine !!! or is asking a country to look into corruption illegal now !

U.S. Code § 2381.Treason:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Also, see Art. 3, sec. 3, clauses 2 & 3.
yes lying and colluding with foreign and domestic entities to overthrow a constitutionally elected administration is treason an act of war !
 
Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?
sure conservatives have no problem with Trump re releasing the transcript !! and why we are at it if the transcript is different from what Schift read and lied about do you have a problem with charging Schift with treason against the United States of America for attempting to overthrow an election with lies ??

Treason? You have no clue when you post such a stupid comment.

he lied in a congressional hearing when he red the transcript !!! he used the lie to legitimize moving forward with impeachment [removing a duly elected president ] with A FALSE STATEMENT ! Or are you trying to say that shift read the actual transcript word for word ....and what in the Ukraine transcript is illegal ??? it never said do what we want or we will not give aide to the Ukraine !!! or is asking a country to look into corruption illegal now !

U.S. Code § 2381.Treason:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Also, see Art. 3, sec. 3, clauses 2 & 3.
yes lying and colluding with foreign and domestic entities to overthrow a constitutionally elected administration is treason an act of war !

Yawn, you can't or won't learn. Sad.
 
Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
Again, you have the undoctored copy. If you believe otherwise, there is no help for you.

Really? How do you know that? How could you know that? Are you suggesting the Lt. Col. Vindman and others are lying?
and how would you know that it isnt exactly what was said !! and yes we are saying that some people are lying !! remember there are others that have stated that their was no wrong doing !! and lets be real you dont give a damn if there was anything done wrong or not ...... you hate the president ,you hate capitalism and you hate this country ...and you dont care how you get rid of Trump as long as you get rid of him .....be man and admit it !! or are you to much of a coward ..[and i think you are ] to say it ... just say it we all know it ... we all know the democrats will do anything to throw out Trump ...so just say it coward .........
Go look it up yourself. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum that has a copy of it.

Nope, dope, it's locked up in a classified server.
It is the same one you have now.

What, did you think there was one hard copy and the Whitehouse made copies and sent them all out?

There is not another transcript. It is the same one they released.

/thread

We want to hear and see the "undoctored" original transcript. In other words - we want to hear and see the exact words as stated in the phone call - not just a partial summary.
Again, you have the undoctored copy. If you believe otherwise, there is no help for you.

Really? How do you know that? How could you know that? Are you suggesting the Lt. Col. Vindman and others are lying?
we got over three yrs of lying from democrats to go by !!! every charge they have leveled is false !! what happened to Russian collusion ...dems dropped it ... what happened to obstruction dems dropped it ! and if the treasonous left has nothing to hide why are they questioning people behind closed doors and limiting access to access and cross examination from republicans !! looks like a sham to stage a coup to tens of millions of real Americans ...its treason !
 
President Trump has a greater oath to keep that "it doesn't look good."

He is responsible for providing for the common defense, and if it takes a call to a foreign government to investigate a high crime, he is doing the right thing. There's no question the law was broken when Biden extorted money and favors from the Ukraine, nor when candidate Clinton took liberties by writing a salacious lie about her opponent, had it routed through foreign agents in two different countries, laundered the money many government leaders had routed to the Clinton Library Foundation in return for 20% of America's uranium reserves in an obstructive manner as a complex as hell money laundering schema that routed money everywhere except America until it landed in the alleged charitable foundation, but was quickly spent to hire people to do in candidate and now President Trump, then they and their god-damned operatives in every liberal press delivering the same lies nonstop for 3 years that routed all those salacious stories to the attention of the American public, and they were so successful at their character assassinations across the board that 55 Republicans retired after being exposed to everything including a sharpshooter assassin who had a history of being a Democrat operative, and left a list targeting Republican people by huge coincidence who were the most hated by Hillary Clinton of them all. Dead men do not lie, and neither do the notes they leave of people they were ordered to murder.
 
If Trump did something so bad to merit three years time and money, so be it. But if not, we better start looking into those that started this wild goose chase to begin with. Particularly the ones that give sanctuary to illegal aliens without benefit of the law or voter consent...
 
sure conservatives have no problem with Trump re releasing the transcript !! and why we are at it if the transcript is different from what Schift read and lied about do you have a problem with charging Schift with treason against the United States of America for attempting to overthrow an election with lies ??

Treason? You have no clue when you post such a stupid comment.

he lied in a congressional hearing when he red the transcript !!! he used the lie to legitimize moving forward with impeachment [removing a duly elected president ] with A FALSE STATEMENT ! Or are you trying to say that shift read the actual transcript word for word ....and what in the Ukraine transcript is illegal ??? it never said do what we want or we will not give aide to the Ukraine !!! or is asking a country to look into corruption illegal now !

U.S. Code § 2381.Treason:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Also, see Art. 3, sec. 3, clauses 2 & 3.
yes lying and colluding with foreign and domestic entities to overthrow a constitutionally elected administration is treason an act of war !

Yawn, you can't or won't learn. Sad.
you are a left wing socialist that believes a man can be a woman just by claiming hes a woman....you beleive that a baby in the womb is not a human being with rights, you believe that Christians are more evil than islamist radicals ,you believe that capitalism is unfair and evil and that socialism is a better way ..and so on and so on ....you and people like you .you weak limp wristed idiot are the ones that cannot learn
 

Forum List

Back
Top