colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
Well, when they call up Russian government officials to talk foreign policy and strategy, that means that you have a legitimate foreign intellifence interest.obama was spying on officials from an incoming administration !What does that have to do with the thread?Hilarious. Relying on 3 year old reports as if anything in them was still relevant.
It was confirmed by Crowdstrike. The information they gave to the FBI was as good as what they would have gotten examining the server. Also the hacked information ended up on WikiLeaks mixed with false information.
1. False.
2. Remember who and what CrowdStrike is....
"What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google"
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge
3. And this....
"WASHINGTON —
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented datapublished by an influential British think tank."
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report
Did I mention that everything that comes from a Democrat source is a lie?
4. ".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "
![]()
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
Either it didn’t ask or wasn’t allowed to examine the DNC’s server.www.slate.com
After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was never….NEVER…even a hint of collusion.
“Other newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.
The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.
In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.
'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.
…former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.
Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.
'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'
Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.
'I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.” Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls