Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is not illegal to unmask someone as long as you have the proper security clearances. A fact you conveniently ignore.
The dossier was not bogus. It was right in at least 2 instances. It was not the only part of the FISA document. Even Devin Nunes had to admit that.
Lying Chick.
Obama sent a plane full of russians home and Mueller indicted more russians -
lock those f'rs up says the american traitors -
Here's Obama offering Putin a quid pro quo.
www.usmessageboard.com
Liar.The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Moron....the Russians funneled the money through Guistra..........you idiot...
Who the hell told you that?
I said RUSSIA, not in general. you dilapidated bag of dumbfuck.RNC got hacked too. And there is no proof russia hacked the DNC. None.The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.
Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers
NO PROOF THE DNC SERVER GOT HACKED
but
RNC GOT HACKED TOO
see there - idiots step on their dress every time
The Russians hacked anything remotely hackable to see what they could come up with to use for meddling, fomenting confusion and partisan divides. That doesn't mean they wanted Clinton to win. And yes, there is proof the server got hacked.
Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
You're going to have to find a bigger wall to throw shit on, liar. This isn't any more space on the one you've been using."CIA Director Once Voted for Communist Presidential Candidate
Liar.Moron....the Russians funneled the money through Guistra..........you idiot...
Who the hell told you that?
"While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, “a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One” began. “These Canadian mining magnates decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.”
These included Uranium One’s then-chairman, Ian Telfer, whose donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (CGSGI) totaled $3.1 million. Giustra himself gave $131.3 million to the Clinton Foundation. Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, Schweizer calculates, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.”
Clinton Russia Ties: Bill & Hillary Sold Out U.S. Interests to Putin Regime | National Review
It's all coming apart for fools like you.
www.politico.com
CrowdStrike said they couldn’t prove it but everything in their experience said it was Russia. Further investigation by authorities with more resources and authority determined that CrowdStrike’s suspicions were correct.So crowdtsrike lies. Now. LOLNo one who knows anything about this actually believes that.IndeedOMG AGAIN i will say there is no proof russia hacked the DNC.I said RUSSIA, not in general. you dilapidated bag of dumbfuck.RNC got hacked too. And there is no proof russia hacked the DNC. None.The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.
Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers
NO PROOF THE DNC SERVER GOT HACKED
but
RNC GOT HACKED TOO
see there - idiots step on their dress every time
The Russians hacked anything remotely hackable to see what they could come up with to use for meddling, fomenting confusion and partisan divides. That doesn't mean they wanted Clinton to win. And yes, there is proof the server got hacked.
Do you two understand now?
In fact, the testimony that was received by Congress from CrowdStrike indicated that there was no proof that this happened. Right now, the thought is that it was an inside job from a whistleblower in the DNC that passed the information to Julian Assange.
How convenient.
No one actually thinks it was an inside job.
Moron....the Russians funneled the money through Guistra..........you idiot...
Who the hell told you that?
"While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, “a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One” began. “These Canadian mining magnates decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.”
These included Uranium One’s then-chairman, Ian Telfer, whose donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (CGSGI) totaled $3.1 million. Giustra himself gave $131.3 million to the Clinton Foundation. Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, Schweizer calculates, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.”
Clinton Russia Ties: Bill & Hillary Sold Out U.S. Interests to Putin Regime | National Review
It's all coming apart for fools like you.
www.factcheck.org
Hilarious. Relying on 3 year old reports as if anything in them was still relevant.
It was confirmed by Crowdstrike. The information they gave to the FBI was as good as what they would have gotten examining the server. Also the hacked information ended up on WikiLeaks mixed with false information.
1. False.
2. Remember who and what CrowdStrike is....
"What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google"
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge
3. And this....
"WASHINGTON —
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented datapublished by an influential British think tank."
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report
Did I mention that everything that comes from a Democrat source is a lie?
4. ".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
Either it didn’t ask or wasn’t allowed to examine the DNC’s server.www.slate.com
I said RUSSIA, not in general. you dilapidated bag of dumbfuck.RNC got hacked too. And there is no proof russia hacked the DNC. None.The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.
Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers
NO PROOF THE DNC SERVER GOT HACKED
but
RNC GOT HACKED TOO
see there - idiots step on their dress every time
The Russians hacked anything remotely hackable to see what they could come up with to use for meddling, fomenting confusion and partisan divides. That doesn't mean they wanted Clinton to win. And yes, there is proof the server got hacked.
Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
Yup. Russia's stated interest is also disruption. The dossier certainly served that purpose and was not in play until after the election was over.
Hacking the DNC server, coordinating with Wikileaks, offering dirt to Trump...they didn't want Clinton to win. Trump is a chump.
Moron....the Russians funneled the money through Guistra..........you idiot...
Who the hell told you that?
"While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, “a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One” began. “These Canadian mining magnates decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.”
These included Uranium One’s then-chairman, Ian Telfer, whose donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (CGSGI) totaled $3.1 million. Giustra himself gave $131.3 million to the Clinton Foundation. Before, during, and after CFIUS’s review, Schweizer calculates, “shareholders involved in this transaction had transferred approximately $145 million to the Clinton Foundation or its initiatives.”
Clinton Russia Ties: Bill & Hillary Sold Out U.S. Interests to Putin Regime | National Review
It's all coming apart for fools like you.
Not that again. Did you slip on one of your custard pies?
The Facts on Uranium One - FactCheck.org
Two House committees have said that they will investigate the Obama administration’s approval of a deal that gave Russia a financial interest in U.S. uranium production. We covered the issue during the 2016 presidential campaign. We'll recap here what we know – and don’t know -- about the 2010 deal.
lol ! tick tock ....So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?
The Kremlin wanted Hillary to win
That is why they hacked the RNC servers and leaked what they found.
Oh wait.......that was the DNC servers
www.cnn.com
What does that have to do with the thread?Hilarious. Relying on 3 year old reports as if anything in them was still relevant.
It was confirmed by Crowdstrike. The information they gave to the FBI was as good as what they would have gotten examining the server. Also the hacked information ended up on WikiLeaks mixed with false information.
1. False.
2. Remember who and what CrowdStrike is....
"What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google"
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge
3. And this....
"WASHINGTON —
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented datapublished by an influential British think tank."
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report
Did I mention that everything that comes from a Democrat source is a lie?
4. ".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
Either it didn’t ask or wasn’t allowed to examine the DNC’s server.
After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was never….NEVER…even a hint of collusion.
“Other newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.
The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.
In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.
'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.
…former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.
Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.
'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'
Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.
'I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.” Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls
Better hurrylol ! tick tock ....So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?
lol ! thanks for verifying that the left needs to take the WH back to hide their wrong doing ! and that feat is not going to be easy ! to bad for communist chicom allied scum like you the evidence will be out this summer! tick tock tick tock ....be afraid...... be very very afraid ...Better hurrylol ! tick tock ....So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?
lol ! thanks for verifying that the left need to take the WH back to hide their wrong doing ! to bad for cum like you the info ill be out this summer tick tock tick tock ....be afraid be very very afraid ...View attachment 335652Better hurrylol ! tick tock ....So why hasn’t anyone seen this information?
No matter how many lies you tell it doesn't change the fact that the Orange Fraud's response to COVID was a disaster.After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was never….NEVER…even a hint of collusion.
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
www.justsecurity.org
obama was spying on officials from an incoming administration !What does that have to do with the thread?Hilarious. Relying on 3 year old reports as if anything in them was still relevant.
It was confirmed by Crowdstrike. The information they gave to the FBI was as good as what they would have gotten examining the server. Also the hacked information ended up on WikiLeaks mixed with false information.
1. False.
2. Remember who and what CrowdStrike is....
"What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google"
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge
3. And this....
"WASHINGTON —
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year's American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented datapublished by an influential British think tank."
Cyber Firm Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report
Did I mention that everything that comes from a Democrat source is a lie?
4. ".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
Either it didn’t ask or wasn’t allowed to examine the DNC’s server.
After four years of lying to the American people, newly released documents find that every Obama official admitted that here was never….NEVER…even a hint of collusion.
“Other newly declassified transcripts released Thursday by the House Intelligence Committee revealed that top Obama administration officials had no concrete evidence that the Trump campaigned colluded with Russia in the 2016 Election.
The transcripts come from 57 witnesses who were interviewed by the committee during the Trump Russia probe. Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice and Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch were among those who gave their testimony.
In her interview with the House Intelligence Committee, conducted on September 8, 2017, Rice admitted there 'wasn't anything smoking' that showed the Trump campaign had helped with Russia's election meddling.
'I don't recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect... prior to my departure,' she stated.
…former AG Loretta Lynch similarly stated that she 'could not say' whether evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy existed when she gave her interview on October 20, 2017.
Other officials who worked in the Obama Administration were also asked about whether or not there was any concrete evidence they had seen.
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated: 'I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.
'That's not to say that there weren't concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. ... But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.'
Samantha Power, who was appointed by Obama to be the US Ambassador to the United Nations, was also among the 57 interviewees probed by the House Intelligence Committee.
'I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn't read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,' Power stated, according to the newly released transcripts.” Obama surprised DoJ officials with knowledge of Michael Flynn's calls
