Docs show John Brennan suppressed intel showing Russia actually wanted Hillary to win

How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.
You canā€™t be serious. Really, you canā€™t be.

The article is referring to documents that haven't been released. I'm just pointing that out.



Declassified testimony here:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf



Stuff like this:

The FBI could not hide the illegality of the plot without pro forma FISA warrants, to ā€˜legallyā€™ allow them to spy on opponents. The apologists have denied that the bogus Steele/Putin dossier was used to get the warrants. In those declassified interviews, McCabe says otherwise:

Gowdy asks: ā€œā€¦did the Bureau rely on what has come to be known as a dossier in any form, and if so, how? MR. MCCABE: So very generally, sir, we did not rely on the Steele reporting for the opening of the investigation into possible Russian influence on the 2016 election, but we did rely on that reporting in the FISA applicationā€ https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf

The OP is referencing documents which have not been released that supposedly indicate that Russia was hoping for Clinton to win the race. Your link and quote has nothing to do with that. Another deflection.


"It was also revealed that Brennan had intel saying Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election because she was more malleable than Donald Trump.

Brennan however suppressed the intel that suggested Russia wanted Hillary to win and ran with narrative that all 17 intel agencies concluded Russia wanted Trump to become president.

The IG report released in December of 2019 confirmed John Brennan did indeed rely on the phony dossier for the ICA report on so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election."
 
How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
If such testimony existed, it wouldnā€™t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.


Just declassified and released by Grenell.

Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.

Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.
You canā€™t be serious. Really, you canā€™t be.

The article is referring to documents that haven't been released. I'm just pointing that out.



Declassified testimony here:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf



Stuff like this:

The FBI could not hide the illegality of the plot without pro forma FISA warrants, to ā€˜legallyā€™ allow them to spy on opponents. The apologists have denied that the bogus Steele/Putin dossier was used to get the warrants. In those declassified interviews, McCabe says otherwise:

Gowdy asks: ā€œā€¦did the Bureau rely on what has come to be known as a dossier in any form, and if so, how? MR. MCCABE: So very generally, sir, we did not rely on the Steele reporting for the opening of the investigation into possible Russian influence on the 2016 election, but we did rely on that reporting in the FISA applicationā€ https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf

The OP is referencing documents which have not been released that supposedly indicate that Russia was hoping for Clinton to win the race. Your link and quote has nothing to do with that. Another deflection.


"It was also revealed that Brennan had intel saying Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election because she was more malleable than Donald Trump.

Brennan however suppressed the intel that suggested Russia wanted Hillary to win and ran with narrative that all 17 intel agencies concluded Russia wanted Trump to become president.

The IG report released in December of 2019 confirmed John Brennan did indeed rely on the phony dossier for the ICA report on so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election."
The documents referenced in the OP have not been released. Yā€™all are celebrating something you havenā€™t seen from a source that isnā€™t exactly the most credible. Sorry if that triggers yā€™all.
 
...Lol.... yea because treason is nuttin. You guys are a hoot.
You need to refresh your memory on the subject of 'treason' as defined in the US Constitution.

Meanwhile...

Everyone with even an ounce of common sense realizes that dragging-up three-year-old James-Bond-007 hor$e$hit is just an attempt to deflect attention away from the mortal danger that the American People are presently in from the COVID-19 pandemic, and your Orange Baboon-God's miserable performance as a national leader in a time of great peril.

If you (collectively) had such a hard-on about all that 3-year-old crap, you would have pursued it far more vigorously long before now.

You waited too long to be viewed as sincere in the matter...


bigstock-no-sale-280.jpg

Really? Defending the Constitution takes a back seat? Government, the press, Congress, even us Internet politicians, can't handle thinking of the virus and the coup and some murder in some state or another and any number of other things? Well, I know the answer to that because you're here, whining about investigations into an attempted coup rather than staying focused on the Wuhan threads...

And we have pursued it vigorously, here, as have investigators in the Senate, Republicans in the House, and even the Barr DOJ. The problem we all faced was that Schiff, for the House, and the intel community leaders kept the real evidence classified so it could never be seen. Now it's available. It would be nice for the left if we could just cover it up and ignore it, and who cares if another innocent man goes to jail, and we could all just focus our energy on our hatred for Saint Donald.
 
...Lol.... yea because treason is nuttin. You guys are a hoot.
You need to refresh your memory on the subject of 'treason' as defined in the US Constitution.

Meanwhile...

Everyone with even an ounce of common sense realizes that dragging-up three-year-old James-Bond-007 hor$e$hit is just an attempt to deflect attention away from the mortal danger that the American People are presently in from the COVID-19 pandemic, and your Orange Baboon-God's miserable performance as a national leader in a time of great peril.

If you (collectively) had such a hard-on about all that 3-year-old crap, you would have pursued it far more vigorously long before now.

You waited too long to be viewed as sincere in the matter...


bigstock-no-sale-280.jpg
Sincere ... lol... good one...
 
...Lol.... yea because treason is nuttin. You guys are a hoot.
You need to refresh your memory on the subject of 'treason' as defined in the US Constitution.

Meanwhile...

Everyone with even an ounce of common sense realizes that dragging-up three-year-old James-Bond-007 hor$e$hit is just an attempt to deflect attention away from the mortal danger that the American People are presently in from the COVID-19 pandemic, and your Orange Baboon-God's miserable performance as a national leader in a time of great peril.

If you (collectively) had such a hard-on about all that 3-year-old crap, you would have pursued it far more vigorously long before now.

You waited too long to be viewed as sincere in the matter...


bigstock-no-sale-280.jpg
lol ! no that the lie and fraud committed by the left in their attempted coup has been revealed it is no longer important ! baaahaaaahaaaaa ! covid ha been contained the economy i going to recover and Trump is going to be reelected ! and obama will go down as the most corrupt POTUS in history !
 

Forum List

Back
Top