colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
You can’t be serious. Really, you can’t be.If such testimony existed, it wouldn’t have been covered up by Devin Nunes.How about behind-doors sworn testimony?
Just declassified and released by Grenell.
Nunes has not had difficulty declassifying information in the past.
Oh, and nothing of the sort has been released.
The article is referring to documents that haven't been released. I'm just pointing that out.
Declassified testimony here:
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf
Stuff like this:
The FBI could not hide the illegality of the plot without pro forma FISA warrants, to ‘legally’ allow them to spy on opponents. The apologists have denied that the bogus Steele/Putin dossier was used to get the warrants. In those declassified interviews, McCabe says otherwise:
Gowdy asks: “…did the Bureau rely on what has come to be known as a dossier in any form, and if so, how? MR. MCCABE: So very generally, sir, we did not rely on the Steele reporting for the opening of the investigation into possible Russian influence on the 2016 election, but we did rely on that reporting in the FISA application” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/am33.pdf
The OP is referencing documents which have not been released that supposedly indicate that Russia was hoping for Clinton to win the race. Your link and quote has nothing to do with that. Another deflection.