Does Donald Trump want to win the climate debate, or trust Jeff Sessions again?

EMH

Diamond Member
Apr 5, 2021
14,805
10,053
2,138
We know he is on record...



Mr. Trump, if you want to destroy the Co2 Fraud, here's how.

Start by asking some questions the Co2 Fraud cannot answer...

1. why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. why can't the Co2 Fraud show us land that is "sinking" from "ocean rise." (land approaching PROF doesn't count)?
4. why is Surface Air Pressure trending down if temperature is going up and there is an ongoing net ice melt?
5. why, if oceans are warming, is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
6. why was highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmosphere fudged in 2005 to show "warming" that never existed in the actual data?

With an unimaginably weak opponent in Kamala, it is time to "fight fight fight" the Co2 Fraud, this time without the "help" of Sessions and Barr, who clearly did everything possible to keep the Co2 Fraud ongoing.

Want to win the climate debate?

Summon The DOCTOR!!!











Just allowing Kamala and the media to call you a "climate denier" isn't a good strategy. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT.

Who is the "life form" responsible for the FBI Fraud prosecution scuttled by Mukasey, W, Obama, Holder, Lynch, and now Garland???

EMH

 
Disagree

The best way to destroy the Climate Cult is to ask the question, "How is mandating everyone drive EV's, like they mandated the jab, going to reduce carbon emissions when you need fossil fuels to charge the batteries?

The goal should be nuclear power, which frees the US from foreign oil abroad. It just has the benefit of being the only viable noncarbon source of fuel around currently.

It is a win/win since no one wants to drive these EV's.

I do agree Trump needs to answer this question better. It just seems to me that no one in the Climate Cult can really use logic to refuse this position. Otherwise, you will just have people questioning your facts is all.
 
All of your gotcha-questions are either outright lies, debunked here many times before, or they're irrelevant to the issue.

That is, they're too stupid even for Trump to use.


Which is why you cannot answer any of them....
 
Disagree

The best way to destroy the Climate Cult is to ask the question, "How is mandating everyone drive EV's, like they mandated the jab, going to reduce carbon emissions when you need fossil fuels to charge the batteries?

The goal should be nuclear power, which frees the US from foreign oil abroad. It just has the benefit of being the only viable noncarbon source of fuel around currently.

It is a win/win since no one wants to drive these EV's.

I do agree Trump needs to answer this question better. It just seems to me that no one in the Climate Cult can really use logic to refuse this position. Otherwise, you will just have people questioning your facts is all.


So, according to you Co2 does cause "warming" even as the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere?


SUBs should stick to debates about Gawd, not science.
 
Because no one has shown that rising temperature and melting ice must increase surface air pressure?


Are you arguing that increasing temperature does not increases surface air pressure?

Are you arguing that adding gas to the atmosphere does not increase surface air pressure?

If you suck all air out of the atmosphere, does that increase or decrease surface air pressure....
 
All of your gotcha-questions are either outright lies, debunked here many times before, or they're irrelevant to the issue.

That is, they're too stupid even for Trump to use.
The globalists have used wars and scams to control people for centuries. This scam is to get a world tax so as we get used to it. A percentage of it will go to 2nd and 3rd world nations supposedly. Perhaps noble. Perhaps not. However, experience tells us that trickle down from many of these nations stops at the top. And the green agendas will most likely cause more poverty and mass deaths. Those who push this certainly have not followed their dictums on us peons.
 
The globalists have used wars and scams to control people for centuries. This scam is to get a world tax so as we get used to it. A percentage of it will go to 2nd and 3rd world nations supposedly. Perhaps noble. Perhaps not. However, experience tells us that trickle down from many of these nations stops at the top. And the green agendas will most likely cause more poverty and mass deaths. Those who push this certainly have not followed their dictums on us peons.


Well, then it is TIME to FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT the Co2 FRAUD with the TRUTH


Co2 does NOTHING

Earth climate change is 99% about where land is and how it is moving tectonically
 
So, according to you Co2 does cause "warming" even as the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere?


SUBs should stick to debates about Gawd, not science.
Why even jump in the ring with them over this question is the point?

Make it clear to everyone that their polices make zero sense to address their own claims that there is a CO2 problem.
 
Why even jump in the ring with them over this question is the point?


Because they are FOS and it is easy to out them as such.... The media, including Faux, will not ask the questions in the OP. Why? Because the Co2 FRAUD cannot answer them without admitting Co2 is not the cause of Earth climate change.

There is NO REASON to "cut carbon emissions" = NONE
 
We know he is on record...



Mr. Trump, if you want to destroy the Co2 Fraud, here's how.

Start by asking some questions the Co2 Fraud cannot answer...

1. why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. why can't the Co2 Fraud show us land that is "sinking" from "ocean rise." (land approaching PROF doesn't count)?
4. why is Surface Air Pressure trending down if temperature is going up and there is an ongoing net ice melt?
5. why, if oceans are warming, is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
6. why was highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing no warming in the atmosphere fudged in 2005 to show "warming" that never existed in the actual data?

With an unimaginably weak opponent in Kamala, it is time to "fight fight fight" the Co2 Fraud, this time without the "help" of Sessions and Barr, who clearly did everything possible to keep the Co2 Fraud ongoing.

Want to win the climate debate?

Summon The DOCTOR!!!











Just allowing Kamala and the media to call you a "climate denier" isn't a good strategy. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT.

Who is the "life form" responsible for the FBI Fraud prosecution scuttled by Mukasey, W, Obama, Holder, Lynch, and now Garland???

EMH

You keep repeating those stupid questions….
Number one: dufus one pole is covered more with sea ice, the other pole more with snow ice. BOTH are losing ice dufus, but snow ice takes longer to recede….
You don’t know the difference between sea ice and snow ice ? Dah…

Question 2 dufus….
The Arctic and Antartica are not warming at the same rate dufus. Guess which one is warming faster…dufus.

Shell we continue foolish ? You don’t know enough science to ask questions that aren’t dumbass do you ?
 
Last edited:
You keep repeating those stupid questions….
Number one: dufus one pole is covered more with sea ice, the other pole more with snow ice. BOTH are losing ice dufus, but snow ice takes longer to recede….
You don’t know the difference between sea ice and snow ice ? Dah…


Earth ice

90% on LAND MASS Antarctica
7% on LAND MASS Greenland
0.3% on LAND MASS Elllesmere Island


So 97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to the poles... and land moves.... not that hard.

SEA ICE is less than 1.5% of total Earth ice.
 
Earth ice

90% on LAND MASS Antarctica
7% on LAND MASS Greenland
0.3% on LAND MASS Elllesmere Island


So 97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to the poles... and land moves.... not that hard.

SEA ICE is less than 1.5% of total Earth ice.
Earth ice ? You still can’t differentiate sea ice vs Snow ice can you dufus. …..why do you think sea ice is only 1.5% of the total ice content dufus ? Guess what snow ice or glacial ice comes from dufus…
 
Earth ice ? You still can’t say sea ice vs Sniw ice can you dufus. …..why do you think sea ice is only 1.5% of the total ice content dufus ?


How much do you think it is??

If 97% of Earth ice is on Antarctica and Greenland....
 
How much do you think it is??

If 97% of Earth ice is on Antarctica and Greenland....
Dufus, why do you think most of the ice is snow ice and on land masses idiot ? When was the last time you saw snow accumulate on the ocean water ? Do you know the difference between salt water and fresh water dufus and why more ice forms from fresh water and snow ice dufus ? Too much thinking hurts you.
 
Dufus, why do you think most of the ice is snow ice and on land masses idiot ? When was the last time you saw snow accumulate on the ocean water ? Do you know the difference between salt water and fresh water dufus and why more ice forms from fresh water and snow ice dufus ? Too much thinking hurts you.


You did not answer the question, similar to your side not being able to answer any of the questions in the OP....
 
How much do you think it is??

If 97% of Earth ice is on Antarctica and Greenland....
So you don’t know shit….97% of the ice is over land bubba…..because that’s where snow accumulates and compresses into snow ice foolish. Snow ice doesn’t accumulate over the open ocean bubba.
 
You did not answer the question, similar to your side not being able to answer any of the questions in the OP....
I answered everything. Just because you don’t know the difference between snow or glacial ice and sea ice means you’re ignorant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top