Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't know the entire "universe" is expanding. Our relatively new part of the universe is expanding and slowing down in its expansion, but the most distant and oldest matter in the universe is accelerating away from us and may be contracting as it is pulled into some supermassive black hole either in our universe or another black hole outside our universe.The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.
Only when ALL motion stops, and that NEVER happens according to the TLoT.Cyclical models are dead. Eventually the universe runs out of usable energy.
.Only when ALL motion stops, and that NEVER happens according to the TLoT.Cyclical models are dead. Eventually the universe runs out of usable energy.
Well, a brainless mindless CON would imagine exactly that!Is it my imagination are does being liberal remove the brain’s ability to use reason and logic.
So you redefine energy as truth!The only solution to the first cause conundrum is something which is eternal and unchanging. Which just so happens to be what truth is.
Pure projection.It would appear that I have angered Ed/Rosy.
You know less about Atheists and Socialists then you do about science, and everything you know about science is WRONG!That’s actually pretty much the same belief that militant atheists who are socialists have. Congratulations.
That would make YOU a militant Atheist.I find that militant atheists are the least scientific people on the planet
(COMMENT)Cyclical models are dead. Eventually, the universe runs out of usable energy.
(COMMENT)Only when ALL motion stops, and that NEVER happens according to the TLoT.
It is actually Inflation THEOLOGY, and it is not in any way scientific, YOUR own source Lederman says so.It’s called inflation theory and it is the leading cosmological model, dumbass.
I don't believe there is a place where absolute zero is reached. I believe there is a place where thermal equilibrium is reached. From a thermodynamic perspective this can only be reached if there is a loss of useable energy for each matter to energy conversion. Unless of course energy is added to the system. Which creates a different question to answer.RE: Does the creation of space and time qualify as a miracle?
※→ edthecynic, et al,
I think we need to be careful here. Thermodynamics is a "practical science" and NOT something that is fundamental alongside physics. Thermodynamics deals with "work" as it relates to:
• Heat (energized particles) by temperature
• Radiation or transfer of energy
(COMMENT)Cyclical models are dead. Eventually, the universe runs out of usable energy.
All energy is "usable." We may not know what all forms of energy there are, but if it is out there, it is usuable. Usability is only limited by our knowledge; know-how.
As long as there are the (chemical) elements of matter or some form of radiation (wavelengths), there is energy. And as long as there is energy, we have not reached "absolute zero."
Q: Is there a place in which absolute zero is expected? A: YES!
As we understand our universe today, at someplace ≈ 13.799±0.021 billion light-years beyond the origin of the universe, there is a point at which energy from the "big bang" has not yet traversed. This assumes that there is only one single source of original energy and only one point of origin of original energy.
(COMMENT)Only when ALL motion stops, and that NEVER happens according to the TLoT.
Again, we do not know, although we highly suspect, that within the boundary of ≈ 13.799±0.021 billion light-years beyond the origin of the universe, only a few localized phenomena have that characteristic. An example might be a "Black Hole.=;" a localized place with such a gravitational impact that no form of electromagnetic radiation may escape. The gravitational field crushes all energy of a system as a result of the Black Hole's gravitational field. This crush compresses all the constituent resonating particles that the gravitational field counteracts the resonant frequency and brings all to a stop.
Just on man's opinion...
Most Respectfully,
R
No wonder you hate yourself so.’m not a fan of trolls. I do not suffer fools.
As we understand our universe today, at someplace ≈ 13.799±0.021 billion light-years beyond the origin of the universe, there is a point at which energy from the "big bang" has not yet traversed.
It is actually Inflation THEOLOGY, and it is not in any way scientific, YOUR own source Lederman says so.It’s called inflation theory and it is the leading cosmological model, dumbass.
"When you read or hear anything about the birth of the universe, someone is making it up. We are in the realm of philosophy. Only God knows what happened at the Very Beginning (and so far She hasn't let on)."
- The Beginning…
By Leon M. Lederman
(COMMENT)just curious how there is an origin of the universe (non cyclical) and what the BB has yet to transverse imply's your definition of the universe as being within something already present.As we understand our universe today, at someplace ≈ 13.799±0.021 billion light-years beyond the origin of the universe, there is a point at which energy from the "big bang" has not yet traversed.
Except MEASUREMENTS show matter at the far extremes of the universe is speeding up, not slowing down!Sooner or later matter runs out of energy, and those 'red shift' thingies slow down
Energy can neither be created or destroyed.It is actually Inflation THEOLOGY, and it is not in any way scientific, YOUR own source Lederman says so.It’s called inflation theory and it is the leading cosmological model, dumbass.
"When you read or hear anything about the birth of the universe, someone is making it up. We are in the realm of philosophy. Only God knows what happened at the Very Beginning (and so far She hasn't let on)."
- The Beginning…
By Leon M. Lederman
That only applies if inflation is considered to include the creation of energy prior to the expansion of the universe. Otherwise inflation is not part of the beginning which has no data in the Lederman quote.
Energy can neither be created or destroyed.It is actually Inflation THEOLOGY, and it is not in any way scientific, YOUR own source Lederman says so.It’s called inflation theory and it is the leading cosmological model, dumbass.
"When you read or hear anything about the birth of the universe, someone is making it up. We are in the realm of philosophy. Only God knows what happened at the Very Beginning (and so far She hasn't let on)."
- The Beginning…
By Leon M. Lederman
That only applies if inflation is considered to include the creation of energy prior to the expansion of the universe. Otherwise inflation is not part of the beginning which has no data in the Lederman quote.
