Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does the surviving bomber get Mirandized? Whats should be his status in your humble opinions, how should we handle this?
Does the surviving bomber get Mirandized? Whats should be his status in your humble opinions, how should we handle this?
He should be treated like any other American citizen. His rights should not be abridged. If they are, it is a threat to the rights of every other American citizen.
If he's part of Al Queda No !
Does the surviving bomber get Mirandized? Whats should be his status in your humble opinions, how should we handle this?
Ronald Reagan, July 1985Now, much needs to be done by all of us in the community of civilized nations. We must act against the criminal menace of terrorism with the full weight of the law, both domestic and international. We will act to indict, apprehend, and prosecute those who commit the kind of atrocities the world has witnessed in recent weeks. We can act together as free peoples who wish not to see our citizens kidnapped or shot or blown out of the skies -- just as we acted together to rid the seas of piracy at the turn of the last century. And incidentally, those of you who are legal scholars will note the law's description of pirates: "hostis humanis'' -- the enemies of all mankind. There can be no place on Earth left where it is safe for these monsters to rest or train or practice their cruel and deadly skills. We must act together, or unilaterally if necessary, to ensure that terrorists have no sanctuary anywhere.
L. Paul Bremer III, the Reagan administration's Ambassador at Large for Counter-Terrorism 1987Another important measure we have developed in our overall strategy is applying the rule of law to terrorists. Terrorists are criminals. They commit criminal actions like murder, kidnapping, and arson, and countries have laws to punish criminals. So a major element of our strategy has been to delegitimize terrorists, to get society to see them for what they are -- criminals -- and to use democracy's most potent tool, the rule of law against them.
Does the surviving bomber get Mirandized? Whats should be his status in your humble opinions, how should we handle this?
Yes, once it's been established that the "ticking time bomb" threat has passed and he also gets a trial in civilian court. Complete with a court appointed lawyer if he can't afford one.
The correct answer is yes, he gets Mirandized.
And it will be the FBI who does it, because this is now a federal case.
'
Well, in my lifetime I have seen patsies murdered on national television, wars started by lies and phony "incidents", CIA criminal and "false flag" operations beyond count, people murdered by the US military and then dumped in the ocean before they could be properly identified -- so many inconsistencies in the "official versions" of events -- that it would come as a real relief if someone who is lynched by the media before he has a trial, and who is not killed before he can tell his story, actually makes it into court in one piece and can, in fact, have a fair trial in the United States.
It would be such a strange and unusual experience.
So I am all for this individual being read his rights and receiving a fair trial and actually being proven guilty!!
It would give me some hope that not all horrors and terrorist acts are the work of the US government and its agencies, and that sometimes there are Satanic acts of which our rulers can be proven not to be guilty.
One has almost lost hope that these horrors will not forevermore be shrouded in mystery and suspicion. Just possibly, this is a terrorist act of which The US government can be proven innocent.
I would not like any dereliction in following the rules of justice to spoil the clarity of such a novelty in our national experience.
.
If he's a U.S. citizen then he gets read his Miranda Rights.
Does the surviving bomber get Mirandized? Whats should be his status in your humble opinions, how should we handle this?
'
Well, in my lifetime I have seen patsies murdered on national television, wars started by lies and phony "incidents", CIA criminal and "false flag" operations beyond count, people murdered by the US military and then dumped in the ocean before they could be properly identified -- so many inconsistencies in the "official versions" of events -- that it would come as a real relief if someone who is lynched by the media before he has a trial, and who is not killed before he can tell his story, actually makes it into court in one piece and can, in fact, have a fair trial in the United States.
It would be such a strange and unusual experience.
So I am all for this individual being read his rights and receiving a fair trial and actually being proven guilty!!
It would give me some hope that not all horrors and terrorist acts are the work of the US government and its agencies, and that sometimes there are Satanic acts of which our rulers can be proven not to be guilty.
One has almost lost hope that these horrors will not forevermore be shrouded in mystery and suspicion. Just possibly, this is a terrorist act of which The US government can be proven innocent.
I would not like any dereliction in following the rules of justice to spoil the clarity of such a novelty in our national experience.
.
In your lifetime you have seen Oswald declare himself to be a patsy, but that didn't make him one.
You have rejected some of the bases for why Congress chose to authorize a war, but that doesn't amount to lying to get us into war.
And in your lifetime you have seen plenty of fair trials.
What we don't get treated to all that much is the notion that we should be treating acts of war as though they are the same things as mere crimes.
The rules of our criminal justice system should ALWAYS be followed where they apply.
But there is NO sensible reason to maintain they apply here.
The Obama Administration is merely repeating a mistake the liberals persist in making.