Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To decide whether someone has constitutional rights when they didnt do anything illegal? LolThat’s the purpose of the judiciary. To decide these things.
When those rights threaten other rights, yeah that’s when they get to decide.To decide whether someone has constitutional rights when they didnt do anything illegal? Lol
Where do they get that authority? It isnt from the constitution. So someone just made it up, right?
Which is what I have said 500 times in this thread.
Based on what someone feels?When those rights threaten other rights, yeah that’s when they get to decide.
Right to a fair trial is in the constitution, silly.Based on what someone feels?
Where do they get that authority?
They just made it up. The govt making up their own authority and people like you defend it.
Its fucking disgusting.
Trump wasnt intimidating anyone.Right to a fair trial is in the constitution, silly.
Thats why it’s illegal to intimidate witnesses. Thats based on what someone feels. Isn’t it?
You're really irrational and emotional.
His actions directly led to people being intimidated, so the effect is the same.Trump wasnt intimidating anyone.
That is impossible to prove. Its all based on feelings.His actions directly led to people being intimidated, so the effect is the same.
It’s always based on feelings, dipshit. Stop pretending like that’s some serious criticism.That is impossible to prove. Its all based on feelings.
You say im irrational all because I think its wrong the govt gives it powers it doesnt have, and citizens lose constitutional rights based on someones feelings.
If thats irrational to a statist POS, ill wear it like a badge of honor.
Good day, bootlicker.
Trump wasnt intimidating anyone.
His actions directly led to people being intimidated, so the effect is the same.
Yet reality and the supreme court decisions do not align with your delusion. Again that's your problem.No delusion about it whatsoever.
That childish cult talking point may get applause on AM radio, but normal, rational people have read the judge's reasoning and understand it. And we all know none of you guys have read jack shit.For irrational TDS people they don't grasp this concept.
Yet reality and the supreme court decisions do not align with your delusion.
I don't have to account for this bizarre analogy.If the supreme court decided that you were a murderer but yet they didn't have any evidence to back it up would you fight it or would you be like oh well that's their decision? They're always right after all.
I don't have to account for this bizarre analogy.
Then dont, dipshit.Yet reality and the supreme court decisions do not align with your delusion. Again that's your problem.
And trump's. Not mine. I don't have to account for it.
That's a fairly childish logical error. Expected.So in other words you got nothing.
I'm not.Then dont, dipshit.
IDC what courts say. The constitution says what it says. And considering what the constitution actually is, what it doesnt say, matters more. Which is the issue here.I'm not.
Now you sit there and cry like a little bitch, while your authoritative declaration gets laughed out of every court.
It's also your way of avoiding the points I did make. Also very childish.
Great. So sit there and enjoy talking to yourself.IDC what courts say.
