Merchan refuses to lift the trial “gag order” and NY Appeals refuses to hear Trump

[Crepitus]

Daddy, daddy, you must get Trump convicted because he's hurt my liberal feelings.

So no, then.

you're just making shit up again.

 

[Marener]

Bragg dragged her father in to a nonsense and highly politically-motivated farce of jurisprudence. She and her father will suffer the conseque3nces.

It is the way of things.

Wow. Conservatives really just keep lowering the bar. Now you guys think that family members are fair game.

 

[Meathead]

So no, then.

you're just making shit up again.

Ya think? Sounds very believable to most.

WTF do you think no one's buying into the convicted criminal BS?

 

[Crepitus]

Ya think? Sounds very believable to most.

WTF do you think no one's buying into the convicted criminal BS?

keep trying.

You know lying is bad right?

 

[d0gbreath]

Trump needs to emphasize that he is being silenced if the mods or Biden bring up the “convicted felon” nonsense.

Here’s how it should play out:

Biden: Well, that’s just fine, coming from someone who’s a convicted felon (or however he works it in)

Trump: I would like to address that, since you know that I believe strongly in Constitutional rights and will see that they are protected should I become president. That means not only one’s right to due process, but of course the 1st Amendment which guarantees that our government cannot silence its critics or opponents. Unfortunately, I am under a gag order by the Democrats and cannot speak to that.

Biden will not bring it up during the debate. He won't; he's presidential like that.

 

[Meathead]

keep trying.

You know lying is bad right?

 

[Marener]

Biden will not bring it up during the debate. He won't; he's presidential like that.

I bet he will. I would if I were him.

He’s running against a convicted criminal. He’d be crazy to not use that.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This just proves how Trump cannot get fair treatment in New York, and that this WILL go to the SCOTUS.

The trial is over and Trump “convicted” - and Merchan refused to lift the gag order. Trump appealed, and the NY appeals court refused to hear his case.

That means Trump is heading into the debate being “gagged” from speaking about the Dems’ use of lawfare (similar to a Banana Republic), explain why what he is charged with is not a crime and that he was targeted as part of election interference, and that it is incomprehensible to restrict the free speech rights of the presidential nominee.

My advice would be for Trump to keep reminding the voters that he is not allowed to speak freely, due to the opposition party restricting his First Amendment Rights.

Trump’s bid to axe gag order in ‘hush money’ case denied by NY’s top court

The Empire State’s Court of Appeals wrote that it was dismissing Trump’s appeal of the limited gag order because “no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

nypost.com

This was to be expected

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I bet he will. I would if I were him.

He’s running against a convicted criminal. He’d be crazy to not use that.

Funny shit since no sentencing has happen. You're no lawyer

 

[d0gbreath]

I bet he will. I would if I were him.

He’s running against a convicted criminal. He’d be crazy to not use that.

It sounds tempting, but it's a debate of important issues for Americans, real or imagined. If he slips it in, phooey on him.

 

[Concerned American]

Trump dragged her into this against her own will. She is an innocent victim.

 

[Marener]

Funny shit since no sentencing has happen. You're no lawyer

Who cares? He’s still a convicted criminal.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Who cares? He’s still a convicted criminal.

So you lie when you call him a convicted criminal. When was he sentenced?

 

[Marener]

So you lie when you call him a convicted criminal. When was he sentenced?

What does sentencing have to do with being a convicted criminal?

We all know the jury found him guilty. That’s a conviction

 

[Catsnmeters]

answered above

Not to me it wasn't.

Do you have any precedent for judges being removed from posts because of who their kids donated too?

 

[Concerned American]

Trump dragged her into this against her own will.

She dragged herself into it when she chose to be a political operative. Her criminal father did her no favors when he refused to recuse himself because of his political bias as well.

Nonsense. Evidence of the harassment from Trump’s social media tirades was introduced to the court as evidence. You don’t know about this because your media keeps you ignorant and easier to manipulate.

There have been no attempts made by Trump or any of his supporters against any of the people you claim to be protecting--protecting from whom? Again, you're projecting. I can truthfully cite cases where democrat supporters have attacked the judiciary after being doxxed by Schumer---Kavanaugh, and a sitting republican house member, Scalise was violently attacked by your ilk. Deny that. While your at it, explain away these threats.

 

[Meathead]

Not to me it wasn't.

Do you have any precedent for judges being removed from posts because of who their kids donated too?

Donated? I think not:

Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case

2 top clients of the Democratic consulting firm owned by the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush money trial raised $93 million in campaign funds since the ex-president&#8217…

nypost.com

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What does sentencing have to do with being a convicted criminal?

We all know the jury found him guilty. That’s a conviction

You aren't considered a convicted anything until you've been sentenced by the judge

 

[Catsnmeters]

Donated? I think not:

Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case

2 top clients of the Democratic consulting firm owned by the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush money trial raised $93 million in campaign funds since the ex-president&#8217…

nypost.com

Cool. Does that mean she more money off Trump's felony conviction then Trump?

What does this have to do with the case though?

 

[Marener]

She dragged herself into it when she chose to be a political operative. Her criminal father did her no favors when he refused to recuse himself because of his political bias as well.

That makes no sense. She has nothing to do with anything.

Merchan sought guidance as to whether he should be recused and the ethics counsel said no.

You lose, dirt bag.

There have been no attempts made by Trump or any of his supporters against any of the people you claim to be protecting--protecting from whom?

There was extensive evidence of the harassment stemming from Trump’s behavior.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/22/politics/trump-gag-order-threats-judge-clerk/index.html