Merchan refuses to lift the trial “gag order” and NY Appeals refuses to hear Trump

[Marener]

You aren't considered a convicted anything until you've been sentenced by the judge

No one gives a shit.

 

[Concerned American]

That makes no sense. She has nothing to do with anything.

Merchan sought guidance as to whether he should be recused and the ethics counsel said no.

You lose, dirt bag.

There was extensive evidence of the harassment stemming from Trump’s behavior.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/22/politics/trump-gag-order-threats-judge-clerk/index.html

You are a bald faced liar. You have come nowhere near substantiating any of your allegations. Blah, blah, blah, run along Pinocchio.

 

[Marener]

You are a bald faced liar. You have come nowhere near substantiating any of your allegations. Blah, blah, blah, run along Pinocchio.

There were public hearings on this dipshit. My link describes them.

 

[Concerned American]

No one gives a shit.

And this is your response when you have none.

 

[Marener]

And this is your response when you have none.

It is when it’s a meaningless technicality that makes absolutely no difference.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It is when it’s a meaningless technicality that makes absolutely no difference.

The supreme court could step in before that and all we'll have is you nashing your teeth and failing on the floor

 

[Concerned American]

It is when it’s a meaningless technicality that makes absolutely no difference.

BS! As for your denial there is no political motives in the Biden judicial system--educate yourself, moron.

Indiana Republican says US attorney 'declined' to prosecute threat against his daughters and wife

Indiana Republican lawmaker Rep. Jim Banks said federal prosecutors "declined" to bring charges against a Fort Wayne man who made threats against his family.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Concerned American]

It is when it’s a meaningless technicality that makes absolutely no difference.

Only meaningless for someone who is as obviously blindly biased as you are.

 

[Marener]

The supreme court could step in before that and all we'll have is you nashing your teeth and failing on the floor

They won't.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They won't.

Time will tell. They do have justification

 

[Marener]

Time will tell. They do have justification

Your strange little right wing fantasies are not justification.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your strange little right wing fantasies are not justification.

So you would have no issues treating a democrat the exact same way Trump was done

 

[Crepitus]

View attachment 964698

Izzat a yes or a no?

 

[Marener]

So you would have no issues treating a democrat the exact same way Trump was done

If any of them are stupid enough to behave like Trump, sure.

You guys never seem to get that Trump brings this on himself by his own bad choices.

 

[Concerned American]

If any of them are stupid enough to behave like Trump, sure.

Like when Biden hid sensitive docs in his garage next to his vette and shared them with his ghost writer? Like that? Why are you not clamoring for his removal from office?

 

[Marener]

So you would have no issues treating a democrat the exact same way Trump was done

If any of them are stupid enough to behave like

Like when Biden hid sensitive docs in his garage next to his vette and shared them with his ghost writer? Like that? Why are you not clamoring for his removal from office?

He didn’t share the documents with his ghost writer.

You guys are more than welcome to impeach him over that, but it’ll look pretty weird after you defended Trump doing far worse.

 

[Concerned American]

You guys are more than welcome to impeach him over that,

YOU should be as eager to impeach him and you would be if you weren't such a biased hypocrite

 

[Marener]

YOU should be as eager to impeach him and you would be if you weren't such a biased hypocrite

I don’t find this to be anywhere near an impeachable offense.

Maybe if he had obstructed justice and tampered with witnesses like Trump did it would be more compelling.

 

[AZrailwhale]

He is awaiting sentencing. Proceedings have not completed yet.

There is no longer a jury to be prejudiced. The trial is over, and at least in theory, the judge is neutral and can’t be swayed by public remarks from either side.

 

[SweetSue92]

This just proves how Trump cannot get fair treatment in New York, and that this WILL go to the SCOTUS.

The trial is over and Trump “convicted” - and Merchan refused to lift the gag order. Trump appealed, and the NY appeals court refused to hear his case.

That means Trump is heading into the debate being “gagged” from speaking about the Dems’ use of lawfare (similar to a Banana Republic), explain why what he is charged with is not a crime and that he was targeted as part of election interference, and that it is incomprehensible to restrict the free speech rights of the presidential nominee.

My advice would be for Trump to keep reminding the voters that he is not allowed to speak freely, due to the opposition party restricting his First Amendment Rights.

Trump’s bid to axe gag order in ‘hush money’ case denied by NY’s top court

The Empire State’s Court of Appeals wrote that it was dismissing Trump’s appeal of the limited gag order because “no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

nypost.com

Straight to SCOTUS then. Decisions today at 10 and tomorrow at 10; could be on immunity.