M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
You argue the Constitution can be interpreted however some court feels like interpreting it.My issue is that the current court cloaks their judicial activism under the guise of "originalism".
Give that, how is their version of "originalsim" an invalid metric?
1: Heller did not overturn any previous court rulingBut like Heller, this overturning of Roe v. Wade utilizes an extraordinary denial of stare decisis....
2: Alijto's opinion makes it clear stare decisis isn't applicable.
And so, as I said:combined with real historical revisionism to claim that the right to an abortion was never a part of American society. To do that they have to totally ignore Colonial America or even the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Instead, they skip to the middle of the 19th century as if that was when the Constitution was written.
You just don't like the decisions.