Donald Trump's BRILLIANT & Unusual Plan to Lower the National Debt

[Uncensored2008]

1. they don't, always.

2. they end up with more revenue every time taxes are raised.

Where did you get that moronic idea?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Tells you where the money is

So the guy making $50K should have what, 99% tax on his income?

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. they don't, always.

2. they end up with more revenue every time taxes are raised.

Where did you get that moronic idea?

The historical tables of the US budget.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The historical tables of the US budget.

Nope.

Tell the truth, you made it up from thin air.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The historical tables of the US budget.

Nope.

Tell the truth, you made it up from thin air.

Admit you've never seen the historical tables for the US budget.

 

[S.J.]

Dude . How can a 1400 mile wall NOT be expensive ??!.

Dep[ends on what you mean by expensive.

Sure, I cant put it on my credit card, but for the $4 trillion annual budget Federali budget it is trivial.

That's the thinking that got us in debt .

No, it really is not.

The wall will reduce illegal immigration, reducing black market labor which would reduce law enforcement costs, raise average wages, grow the tax base and reduce the costs of incarceration.

This is one of the few ideas that would have a net negative long term impact on our Federali budget debt.

The walls a waste of money and will have little affect .

40% of illegals enter legally . Wall does nothing for that . The cost of maintaining and patrolling the wall will increase law enforcement expense .

Incarceration will explode because trump is rounding up illegals . Splitting families and adding people to welfare cause mom or dad has no been deported .

IF that number is accurate, it means 60% enter illegally. The wall would keep them out.
No rounding up would be necessary. If their welfare is cut off they will leave on their own and why would they not take their families with them? Are you saying they would leave them here to fend for themselves?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Admit you've never seen the historical tables for the US budget.

LOL;

Another leftist liar busted.

Here are facts, something you avoid at all costs.

Income Tax Cuts Increase Growth but Reduce Revenue

 

[NYcarbineer]

Admit you've never seen the historical tables for the US budget.

LOL;

Another leftist liar busted.

Here are facts, something you avoid at all costs.

Income Tax Cuts Increase Growth but Reduce Revenue

Your link title proves me right, if nothing else.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You're link title proves me right, if nothing else.

It cites that revenue decreased and growth increased when Bush cut taxes, and that revenue decreased and growth decreased with Clinton increased taxes.

You cannot show revenue increasing from a tax increase.

 

[bendog]

You're link title proves me right, if nothing else.

It cites that revenue decreased and growth increased when Bush cut taxes, and that revenue decreased and growth decreased with Clinton increased taxes.

You cannot show revenue increasing from a tax increase.

not even close. It says reducing taxes cannot be tied to increased growth. And, it says there is some evidence that a tax on business (not higher incomes) like Obamacare on Subway sandwich shops will decrease biz activity.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're link title proves me right, if nothing else.

It cites that revenue decreased and growth increased when Bush cut taxes, and that revenue decreased and growth decreased with Clinton increased taxes.

You cannot show revenue increasing from a tax increase.

You're link title proves me right, if nothing else.

It cites that revenue decreased and growth increased when Bush cut taxes, and that revenue decreased and growth decreased with Clinton increased taxes.

You cannot show revenue increasing from a tax increase.

The Clinton tax increase was 1993.

Revenues increased yearly through 2000.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/f...14/reports/45010/45010-breakout-AppendixH.pdf

 

[IsaacNewton]

Just start charging energy companies on every kilojoule of energy they extract from the public's land. Debt would be paid off rather quickly. Oil, coal, and the rest. Also, all ore taken from federal or state land.

It all belongs to the American people, they should get paid for all of it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Clinton tax increase was 1993.

Revenues increased yearly through 2000.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/f...14/reports/45010/45010-breakout-AppendixH.pdf

Revenue sharply increased after the Bush tax cuts in 2004, but if 45% of those are from income taxes, then what is the impact of higher fees and tariffs on revenue?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Just start charging energy companies on every kilojoule of energy they extract from the public's land. Debt would be paid off rather quickly. Oil, coal, and the rest. Also, all ore taken from federal or state land.

It all belongs to the American people, they should get paid for all of it.

Say Comrade, wouldn't severely increasing the cost of electricity be regressive, hurting those least able to pay the most?

Oh that's right, you're a Communist, you want to crush the middle class and put all but the ruling elite into abject poverty....

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Clinton tax increase was 1993.

Revenues increased yearly through 2000.

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/f...14/reports/45010/45010-breakout-AppendixH.pdf

Revenue sharply increased after the Bush tax cuts in 2004, but if 45% of those are from income taxes, then what is the impact of higher fees and tariffs on revenue?

Don't dodge the fact that you were wrong. Man up. Borrow some balls if you have to.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Just start charging energy companies on every kilojoule of energy they extract from the public's land. Debt would be paid off rather quickly. Oil, coal, and the rest. Also, all ore taken from federal or state land.

It all belongs to the American people, they should get paid for all of it.

Say Comrade, wouldn't severely increasing the cost of electricity be regressive, hurting those least able to pay the most?

Oh that's right, you're a Communist, you want to crush the middle class and put all but the ruling elite into abject poverty....

'Communist' for you is like your teddy bear. You say it because then you feel all safe and cozy like mommy just tucked you in.

The public owns the commodity, and should get paid for anyone that wants to buy that commodity. As capitalist as it gets.

Your way, of giving away the commodity owned by the public, is in fact the communist way. You want to give away free shit. You must be a Reagan communist.

 

[RollingThunder]

Donald Trump's BRILLIANT & Unusual Plan to Lower the National Debt

You are, of course, referring to his plan to completely destroy the United States.....leaving no nation....and thus, no national debt.

Not interested!

 

[Kosh]

Vote Bernie!

And how is he going to pay for all the new 2 Trillion dollars of free stuff he wants to give away?

 

[bendog]

Data does not support either cutting or raising taxes correlates 100% with rising or declining revenue. Thus, there is no direct causation. Both can have some effect or either rising or declining growth. There is no question that at some level public debt depresses, and can even prevent, econ growth. The exact level is disputed. However, if present trends continue, we will have to choose between retaining a military or social security - there is no debate as to that.

 

[The Great Goose]

Vote Bernie!

And how is he going to pay for all the new 2 Trillion dollars of free stuff he wants to give away?

tax companies that strip your nationally owned resources instead of subsidising them.