ABikerSailor
Diamond Member
Experience in the Senate is not the same. Itās not. Why do you think we never seem to elect anyone that has served?Itās pertinent, because you felt Obama had the ability to lead, even though he had no experience.His being a specialty officer (medical), means that he has little to no experience in running a command. Only line officers are qualified to be CO's. And, because he has no experience related to running the VA, he's unqualified.
So what qualifications did Obama have in order to lead a country? I hardly think "community organizer" qualifies as "command experience."
Wow................you can't talk about the fact that this doc has no qualifications to run the VA. All you can do is deflect to Obama. Hate to tell you, but Obama left office a year and a half ago.
Hey, at least Obama had experience in the Senate before he ran for president.
This doc has zero experience and more than likely no idea as to how to run an organization like that. He has no command experience. If he was a line officer, I might feel a bit different.
Obama spent time in the Senate before he ran.
Bush Jr. was governor of Texas before he ran.
Clinton was governor of Arkansas before he ran.
Bush Sr. was in the Senate as well as was VP before he ran.
Reagan was governor of California before he ran.
Ford served in Congress and was VP before he ran.
Nixon served in both the Senate and Congress before he ran.
So.......................where are all those presidents we seem to elect that have never served in government before?