Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
don't even pretend you cry for me or my children. there isn't anything about you that Represents me or my views in this country. take your fake ass tears while trying to take away MORE oF our rights and shove it. You sick freak
SNIP:
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fthefederalist.com%2Fimages%2Ffacebook-aside.png&hash=bd659a5595c6169d049b086897fcc7c1)
Donât Cry For Us, President Obama
In yet another speech on gun control, President Obama shed tears. Manipulate much?
January 6, 2016 By Nicole Russell
On Tuesday, President Obama shed tears during a speech wherein he mentioned previous shootings as motivating his new executive directives on gun violence. His tears are a nauseating display of masterful chicanery, a sign that heâs determined to make his last year his most unforgettable.
Obama, the Benevolent Dictator
During his speech, Obama said, âOur unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, those rights were stripped from college kids in Blackburg and Santa Barbara and from high schoolers in Columbine and from first graders in NewtonâŚfirst gradersâŚEvery time I think about those kids, it gets me mad.â
After imprinting the image of Sandy Hook in our minds, Obama revealed a set of proposals to tighten loopholes. The Wall Street Journal says they are limited in reach but symbolically powerful. In other words, itâs emotional manipulation either way, as itâs all about making laws to make people feel better about themselves rather than making more effective laws (or repealing laws that have evil unintended consequences).
To conservatives, as David Harsanyi said, âPerhaps no post-World War II president (and maybe none before) has justified his executive overreach by openly contending he was working around the law-making branch of government because it has refused to do what he desired.â
House Speaker Paul Ryan also failed to be impressed. âRather than focus on criminals and terrorists, he goes after the most law-abiding of citizens. His words and actions amount to a form of intimidation that undermines liberty.â
Tears, Schmears
To ensure that Obamaâs gun proposals were well-received, he cried. Liberals were elated and in awe of the humanity of their president. (I donât recall liberals applauding Obama when the New York Daily News reported he cried tears during Aretha Franklinâs âNatural Woman.â)
I guess Bill Clintonâs âI feel your painâ never goes out of style for some people, even when subsequent events prove ineffective empathy worsens than the original problem.
Folks are speculating about whether the tears are real. I donât know, and I donât care. Crying manufactured tears smacks of deception but crying real tears doesnât make executive overreach better, either. In the one case, itâs deliberate emotional manipulation, and in the other itâs a weird display of a lack of self-control and self indulgence.
Crying manufactured tears smacks of deception but crying real tears doesnât make executive overreach better.
Since Obama did appear to actually cry regardless, it raises the question: Why didnât he cry during any of his previous addresses immediately following a shooting? If one were feeling emotional, empathetic, or even frustrated, tears then would be natural, even understandable.
Other presidents have certainly cried while in office, but these moments listed here are all generally âoff-cameraâ (even those of Clinton) or occur while reminiscing a difficult decision, not explaining a proposal that reeks of political posturing.
all of it here:
Donât Cry For Us, President Obama
SNIP:
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fthefederalist.com%2Fimages%2Ffacebook-aside.png&hash=bd659a5595c6169d049b086897fcc7c1)
Donât Cry For Us, President Obama
In yet another speech on gun control, President Obama shed tears. Manipulate much?
January 6, 2016 By Nicole Russell
On Tuesday, President Obama shed tears during a speech wherein he mentioned previous shootings as motivating his new executive directives on gun violence. His tears are a nauseating display of masterful chicanery, a sign that heâs determined to make his last year his most unforgettable.
Obama, the Benevolent Dictator
During his speech, Obama said, âOur unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, those rights were stripped from college kids in Blackburg and Santa Barbara and from high schoolers in Columbine and from first graders in NewtonâŚfirst gradersâŚEvery time I think about those kids, it gets me mad.â
After imprinting the image of Sandy Hook in our minds, Obama revealed a set of proposals to tighten loopholes. The Wall Street Journal says they are limited in reach but symbolically powerful. In other words, itâs emotional manipulation either way, as itâs all about making laws to make people feel better about themselves rather than making more effective laws (or repealing laws that have evil unintended consequences).
To conservatives, as David Harsanyi said, âPerhaps no post-World War II president (and maybe none before) has justified his executive overreach by openly contending he was working around the law-making branch of government because it has refused to do what he desired.â
House Speaker Paul Ryan also failed to be impressed. âRather than focus on criminals and terrorists, he goes after the most law-abiding of citizens. His words and actions amount to a form of intimidation that undermines liberty.â
Tears, Schmears
To ensure that Obamaâs gun proposals were well-received, he cried. Liberals were elated and in awe of the humanity of their president. (I donât recall liberals applauding Obama when the New York Daily News reported he cried tears during Aretha Franklinâs âNatural Woman.â)
I guess Bill Clintonâs âI feel your painâ never goes out of style for some people, even when subsequent events prove ineffective empathy worsens than the original problem.
Folks are speculating about whether the tears are real. I donât know, and I donât care. Crying manufactured tears smacks of deception but crying real tears doesnât make executive overreach better, either. In the one case, itâs deliberate emotional manipulation, and in the other itâs a weird display of a lack of self-control and self indulgence.
Crying manufactured tears smacks of deception but crying real tears doesnât make executive overreach better.
Since Obama did appear to actually cry regardless, it raises the question: Why didnât he cry during any of his previous addresses immediately following a shooting? If one were feeling emotional, empathetic, or even frustrated, tears then would be natural, even understandable.
Other presidents have certainly cried while in office, but these moments listed here are all generally âoff-cameraâ (even those of Clinton) or occur while reminiscing a difficult decision, not explaining a proposal that reeks of political posturing.
all of it here:
Donât Cry For Us, President Obama