Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.Nike stock went down a couple of dollars when they signed him. Their stock prices had risen rather dramatically over rhe last year. about $20 per share from $58 to about $80 and now $83. A small dip since rhe signing a week ago has been recovered and is now shooting up and rising.Well their stock is up as well. I posted a picture of it in the thread. Next requirement?
How much is there stock up since signing him?
View attachment 215789
I had to laugh out loud when I read Liberty U. The Falwell run university that sold its soul to back Trump and continues to lick his boots. LOL. Nike is really worried about Liberty U...ROFLMAO.Just wanted to start a list of schools who are dropping or are considering dropping Nike
Liberty May Drop Nike Deal Over Ad Campaign - Athletic Business
College Volleyball Team Chooses "Country Over Company" and Ditches Nike Uniforms for Grey T Shirts
Georgia University Cuts Ties With Nike After Colin Kaepernick Ad
3 and counting! Add to the list if you know of more.
Me too.I had to laugh out loud when I read Liberty U. The Falwell run university that sold its soul to back Trump and continues to lick his boots. LOL. Nike is really worried about Liberty U...ROFLMAO.Just wanted to start a list of schools who are dropping or are considering dropping Nike
Liberty May Drop Nike Deal Over Ad Campaign - Athletic Business
College Volleyball Team Chooses "Country Over Company" and Ditches Nike Uniforms for Grey T Shirts
Georgia University Cuts Ties With Nike After Colin Kaepernick Ad
3 and counting! Add to the list if you know of more.
It’ll be down next week. You sign s big name stock is supposed to skyrocket. Soros probably hiked it up.No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.Nike stock went down a couple of dollars when they signed him. Their stock prices had risen rather dramatically over rhe last year. about $20 per share from $58 to about $80 and now $83. A small dip since rhe signing a week ago has been recovered and is now shooting up and rising.How much is there stock up since signing him?
View attachment 215789
Down.10, since rhe signing. 10 cents. Am I reading the graph wrong?
Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
Its like I said. Drumpf supporters will deny the facts and create a narrative that makes them feel better. Stocks are up. Sales are up. Somehow whats a good thing for any other company is a bad thing for Nike.No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.Nike stock went down a couple of dollars when they signed him. Their stock prices had risen rather dramatically over rhe last year. about $20 per share from $58 to about $80 and now $83. A small dip since rhe signing a week ago has been recovered and is now shooting up and rising.How much is there stock up since signing him?
View attachment 215789
Down.10, since rhe signing. 10 cents. Am I reading the graph wrong?
Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
The narrative that would send it down is that people are boycotting, sales are low, and earnings are down.. Mysteriously it went up after investors saw that the boycott didnt amount to a hill of beans.It’ll be down next week. You sign s big name stock is supposed to skyrocket. Soros probably hiked it up.No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.Nike stock went down a couple of dollars when they signed him. Their stock prices had risen rather dramatically over rhe last year. about $20 per share from $58 to about $80 and now $83. A small dip since rhe signing a week ago has been recovered and is now shooting up and rising.
View attachment 215789
Down.10, since rhe signing. 10 cents. Am I reading the graph wrong?
Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
I know what you stated. The problem is you dont appear to understand stocks. Bad news...stocks go down. Good news....stocks go up. Pretty simple eh? People trying to make this a loss are the type of people that support Drumpf and his alternate reality. Its not like they announced this last hour. The market has had time to react.Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
As I stated in my post, I went back a full year and my evaluation was based on the stock going from about $58 per share one year ago and making a steady rise to about $80 per share. The signing seemed to have had a very small and temporary impact on Nike stock prices. I know little about the stock market. Maybe you know more about the subject than me. I was just forming an opinion by looking at the data.Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
I understand stock investing much more than you. Stay out of the deep end of the pool Jr. You’ll drown and make a bigger idiot out of yourself.I know what you stated. The problem is you dont appear to understand stocks. Bad news...stocks go down. Good news....stocks go up. Pretty simple eh? People trying to make this a loss are the type of people that support Drumpf and his alternate reality.Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.I find it funny that people are arguing about stock prices with only a 1 week period. Both sides claiming victory. Hilarious.
Says the guy that is claiming a week isnt enough time for the market to react.I understand stock investing much more than you. Stay out of the deep end of the pool Jr. You’ll drown and make a bigger idiot out of yourself.I know what you stated. The problem is you dont appear to understand stocks. Bad news...stocks go down. Good news....stocks go up. Pretty simple eh? People trying to make this a loss are the type of people that support Drumpf and his alternate reality.Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.Claiming victory? We are discussing the immediate impact of a large company making a political decision to promote their products.
Reebok is happy.Its like I said. Drumpf supporters will deny the facts and create a narrative that makes them feel better. Stocks are up. Sales are up. Somehow whats a good thing for any other company is a bad thing for Nike.No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.Nike stock went down a couple of dollars when they signed him. Their stock prices had risen rather dramatically over rhe last year. about $20 per share from $58 to about $80 and now $83. A small dip since rhe signing a week ago has been recovered and is now shooting up and rising.
View attachment 215789
Down.10, since rhe signing. 10 cents. Am I reading the graph wrong?
I never said it wasn’t enough time for a market to react. You really need to brush up on your comprehension skills. A week in a stocks long term life is nothing. It could fall just as easily next week. You fail to understand long term investing. I highly doubt you are a day trader that could take advantage of a very small short term boom. Feel free to reply and make a bigger ass of yourself.Says the guy that is claiming a week isnt enough time for the market to react.I understand stock investing much more than you. Stay out of the deep end of the pool Jr. You’ll drown and make a bigger idiot out of yourself.I know what you stated. The problem is you dont appear to understand stocks. Bad news...stocks go down. Good news....stocks go up. Pretty simple eh? People trying to make this a loss are the type of people that support Drumpf and his alternate reality.Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?Yes, claiming victory. If you weren’t, you would be honest about long term growth, investor valuation and what may happen at the end of the quarter. But you aren’t, you are talking about a snapshot in time and trying to use that as your basis of a campaign succeeding.
Why is Reebok happy? Nikes sales are up which is bad thing for ReebokReebok is happy.Its like I said. Drumpf supporters will deny the facts and create a narrative that makes them feel better. Stocks are up. Sales are up. Somehow whats a good thing for any other company is a bad thing for Nike.No, but the graph you show tells the same story. Stock goes down when the signing is announced, stays down for about a week and comes back up. Your graph misses today when it came back up some more. Nike stock was only affected for a week.You mean this graph that shows they are still down because of their divisive politics?All I did was Google Nike stock. Gave immediate access to graphs. Well, I had to click the one year graph because the day prices (hourly graph) came up first.I'm guessing this this is going to require you to find the goalposts after he responds.
View attachment 215789
Down.10, since rhe signing. 10 cents. Am I reading the graph wrong?
We werent talking about the long term life you idiot. We were talking about how the news of the signing affected Nike.I never said it wasn’t enough time for a market to react. You really need to brush up on your comprehension skills. A week in a stocks long term life is nothing. It could fall just as easily next week. You fail to understand long term investing. I highly doubt you are a day trader that could take advantage of a very small short term boom. Feel free to reply and make a bigger ass of yourself.Says the guy that is claiming a week isnt enough time for the market to react.I understand stock investing much more than you. Stay out of the deep end of the pool Jr. You’ll drown and make a bigger idiot out of yourself.I know what you stated. The problem is you dont appear to understand stocks. Bad news...stocks go down. Good news....stocks go up. Pretty simple eh? People trying to make this a loss are the type of people that support Drumpf and his alternate reality.Nope. I don’t invest in stocks of this sort, they are too volitale and quite frankly to low in value. I’m simply stating a one week period is to short a time to claim Said victory in the long run. It would be a victory for the individual investor if the indeed sold stock and reaped the monetary benefit. However In This case people on both sides are trying to state this is a win when in the long term, we simply don’t know either way.Whats wrong with claiming victory when your investments go up? You mad?
