Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

I said nothing of a criminal conviction.

Evidence is still required for civil ruling. The evidentiary standard is the preponderance of evidence. The only opinion is when the judge rules whether or not the plaintiffs met that standard.
What type of civil ruling? This isn’t a civil case.
 
So no charges for insurrection. No trial date for insurrection. No conviction for insurrection.

But he is being punished for insurrection.

You are really having to twist yourself into pretzels today, Dumbfuck.

All that was needed was for the plaintiff to prove to the court that J6 was an insurrection and that Trump was involved to some capacity. They did that in 3 separate courts.
 
Yes, the argument was presented in court.

Trump wasn't charged with insurrection. Everyone knows that. He's not criminally convicted. He's not going to jail for insurrection.

But he can't be on the ballot for now.
Clearly you do not know that the Justices stayed the decision. It is not in effect now.
 
Here is what pisses me off.
1. Al Gore declared he won the election vs Bush. Gore was never prosecuted.
2. Hillary Clinton still insists she won the election vs Trump. Hillary never had to hire a lawyer to defend her.
3. Trump declared he won and he is being tried in courts with the intent to put him in prison.

Do you see something wrong in that?

Unlike Trump, Gore never tried to illegally steal the election he lost. Same with Hillary. Even Trump has not been indicted for declaring he won in 2020.
 
These freaks literally have no idea what they're arguing about.
No doubt. Abject simpletons.
They have ridiculous, random talking points which don’t even work together and have zero understanding of how any of this works.
 
Trump wasn’t charged with insurrection™ but that argument was presented in court?

Seems strange that a defendant would need to defend himself in court against a crime he wasn’t charged with.

Tell that to the others who were denied a seat in public office without ever being convicted of insurrection.
 
Actually, some were convicted of seditious conspiracy; which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
Actually, seditious conspiracy is two words and spelled differently than insurrection.

Is there anything in the legal code that that identifies, “an anonymous (im)poster on a message board identified the gateway crime of seditious conspiracy as a next step to insurrection™”
 
Unlike Trump, Gore never tried to illegally steal the election he lost. Same with Hillary. Even Trump has not been indicted for declaring he won in 2020.
Trump went to court as did Gore. Hillary to this day declares she won the election.
This is known as jack off justice. We all know it and see it clearly.

Trump did not try to do a thing unlawful.
 
Actually, seditious conspiracy is two words and spelled differently than insurrection.

Is there anything in the legal code that that identifies, “an anonymous (im)poster on a message board identified the gateway crime of seditious conspiracy as a next step to insurrection™”

Ok, so now everyone here knows you have no idea what seditious conspiracy is. Thanks for that concession.
thumbsup.gif
 
Trump went to court as did Gore. Hillary to this day declares she won the election.
This is known as jack off justice. We all know it and see it clearly.

Trump did not try to do a thing unlawful.

Trump was also not indicted for going to court.

What the fuck are you rambling about??
 

Forum List

Back
Top